A licensing decision and two different questions

A Korean business receives an administrative decision restricting an activity on which it relies. The notice identifies a statutory provision, but the business disputes both the interpretation of that provision and the fairness of the procedure used. Its manager assumes that filing any court document immediately restores the previous permission. Another employee proposes asking the Constitutional Court to decide all factual disputes directly. The company has the written decision, the relevant application materials and records of the opportunity it was given to respond. No filing date, urgency finding or special statutory exception is supplied in this exercise. The learner must organize the legal questions and identify the information needed before selecting a remedy.