A Protective Order in the Wrong Folder
You are the felony records clerk in a courthouse that keeps paper files. At 9:15 a.m. a reporter from the local paper submits a written request to inspect the entire file in State v. Alvarez, case CR-24-0198, including "everything in the folder." While pulling the file you find, stapled behind the indictment, a two-page temporary protective order issued in a domestic-relations case involving a different person whose surname is also Alvarez. The order lists the petitioner's new street address and the school her children attend, and it is stamped "address confidential." The criminal file has been inspected twice in the past month by the defendant's attorney. Your jurisdiction's access policy says docket entries are public, but access to documents that are not docketed is granted only by written order of the judge, and confidential information must not be released to anyone not entitled to it. Separately, a cart of closed traffic files from 2021 sits in the back room tagged for destruction under a three-year retention schedule; one file has a pending public-records request attached and another is under appeal.
1. List, in order, what you do about the misfiled protective order and explain why you may not simply pull it out and slip it into the correct file.
Read the worked answer
Order of operations:
- Stop. Do not remove, restaple, copy for anyone, or photograph with a personal phone. Set the file aside in a secure location and note who had it last.
- Notify your records supervisor and the judge's staff in writing, naming the case numbers, the time found, and the two prior inspections.
- Audit note in the case management system - "document of another matter found in file; file secured; pending direction" - without transcribing the address into the note.
- Alert the domestic-relations clerk and the petitioner's attorney through official channels so the protected party can be advised; her address was sitting in a file strangers may inspect.
- Await direction on physical removal; the judge (or supervisor under written procedure) authorizes any correction, and the correction is documented with a memo and a corrected docket notation. The original is retained.
Why not just re-file it: the court record must be trustworthy and traceable. Quiet removal destroys the evidence of how long the address was exposed, defeats any inquiry into who saw it, and looks like concealment. It also risks putting a confidential address into the hands of the Alvarez defendant or his counsel, who inspected the file twice.
2. The reporter is at the counter. Using the access policy given, state what you release, what you refuse, and how you document the request.
Read the worked answer
Release: the docket sheet for CR-24-0198. Docket entries are public by the policy stated.
Refer, do not release: the indictment and other documents that are not docketed. The policy gives the clerk no discretion here - the request goes to the judge by written order. Tell the reporter in neutral words that non-docketed material requires a judicial order and give the procedure, without predicting the outcome.
Never release: the protective order, the address, the school, or any acknowledgment that such a document exists. The reporter asked for "everything in the folder"; the answer is a category rule, not a document-by-document confirmation.
Document: time and date received, the exact scope requested, what was provided, what was referred, the name of the person served, and the staff member who handled it. Two traps to avoid: guessing at the judge's likely ruling, and letting the misfiled document influence what you say about the file's contents.
3. Before the 2021 traffic cart goes to destruction, what checks do you run and what do you do with the two flagged files?
Read the worked answer
Destruction is irreversible, so the cart is verified item by item against the retention schedule rather than by the tag on the handle.
- Pull the file with the pending public-records request and the file under appeal and remove them from the cart. A pending request or appeal suspends destruction; releasing or destroying records while a request is open is a denial of access dressed up as routine housekeeping.
- Verify the schedule: closed traffic files, three years from final disposition - confirm each file is actually closed and the disposition date is on or before the cutoff, not merely that the cart label says 2021.
- Confirm the protective order is not in this batch and that no other file is linked to CR-24-0198.
- Get written supervisor approval and complete a certificate of destruction listing case numbers, count, method, date, and the two staff members present, and retain the certificate permanently.
- If any file fails a check, return it to the shelf and note why.