An inconsistent application record
A life-insurance application contains an occupational description that differs between the signed form and a supporting document. A requested medical record has not yet arrived, and the proposed sum assured is substantial relative to the income information currently provided. A trainee proposes immediately labeling the applicant dishonest and inserting a diagnosis inferred from a single laboratory term. The senior underwriter has authority to request clarification but has not yet reached an acceptance decision. No company-specific loading, exclusion or clinical diagnosis is supplied in the exercise. The task asks for the next evidence-handling steps and a clear statement about the difference between an underwriting assessment and an unsupported accusation.
1. What should be clarified?
Read the worked answer
Reconcile the occupational descriptions, obtain the relevant authorized medical evidence and review the financial basis for the requested amount under the insurer’s actual process.
2. Why is the trainee’s proposal inappropriate?
Read the worked answer
The incomplete record does not establish deception or a diagnosis. Underwriting should use relevant evidence and appropriate professional interpretation, with a documented decision within the authorized scope.