A 16th-Century Yangban Household Exhibit
A regional museum in Andong is planning a 12-object exhibit called 'A Day in a 16th-Century Yangban Household.' The family in the scenario is a local yangban lineage in the 1550s with 12 slaves, a seodang, and ancestral rites. Proposed objects are: (1) a white porcelain jar; (2) a 1446 printed copy of Hunminjeongeum; (3) a slave sale contract; (4) a 1930s photograph of a seowon; (5) a printed Confucian primer; (6) a modern Korean newspaper; (7) a wooden movable-type block for a Buddhist text; (8) a cotton jacket. The museum has a small label budget and wants each object to teach one social relationship. A board member says the exhibit should include the 1446 copy because it proves everyone wrote in Hangul; another wants the photograph because it 'looks old.' The curator must select four objects and write labels that avoid anachronism.
1. Select four appropriate objects and explain what social relationship each one teaches; identify two objects that should be excluded.
Read the worked answer
A defensible four-object set is the white porcelain jar, slave sale contract, printed Confucian primer, and cotton jacket. The white porcelain jar teaches elite consumption and craft production; it is plausible for a 1550s yangban household and can be contrasted with commoner pottery. The slave sale contract teaches legal status and property relations: the household's 12 slaves were not wage laborers but people treated as inheritable property in Joseon law. The printed Confucian primer teaches yangban education, seodang instruction, and preparation for civil service examinations; it also shows that elite male literacy was centered on Literary Chinese. The cotton jacket teaches clothing, status, and the spread of cotton textiles. Exclude the 1446 printed copy of Hunminjeongeum: it is extraordinarily rare, not a normal household item, and it cannot prove that everyone wrote in Hangul in the 1550s. Exclude the 1930s photograph of a seowon because photography is a much later technology and the photo would mislead visitors about the 16th-century setting. The modern newspaper is also an obvious anachronism.
2. Write a short label explaining literacy and Hangul in the 1550s that corrects the board member's claim.
Read the worked answer
Label text: 'Hangul was promulgated in 1446, but in the 1550s it was not the everyday script of every Korean. Yangban men trained in Literary Chinese for exams, official documents, and Confucian classics. Hangul was used in letters, legal petitions, women's writing, and some instruction, especially by people without prolonged classical education. A 1446 copy of Hunminjeongeum would be a rare royal publication, not evidence of universal literacy.' This label explains the social relationship between script and status. It also tells visitors why the exhibit uses a later Hangul letter or a Confucian primer rather than the 1446 copy: the rare edition would overstate uniformity and distract from the household's actual hierarchy. The board member's claim should be corrected gently but clearly: the existence of Hangul does not equal mass literacy in the 16th century.