Pressure to Seal Another Firm's Construction Set
You are a licensed surveyor in a state with a responsible-charge statute. A solar developer retains you to survey a 240-acre site and prepare an ALTA/NSPS boundary survey. After you deliver the boundary and topographic data, the developer's project manager sends you a 28-sheet construction drawing set prepared by an unlicensed CAD technician in another state. The set uses your boundary and a drone-derived DSM, but you did not supervise the DSM processing. The project manager asks you to sign and seal the set “as the surveyor” before a Friday permitting deadline. You notice that Sheet 12 shows a 4.5 m access road encroaching into a mapped wetland buffer, and the ALTA table omits a 0.6 m boundary overlap with the adjoining parcel that your field crew found. The project manager says the overlap is “a title company problem” and asks you to remove it from the notes.
1. Can you sign and seal the set? Apply responsible-charge principles and identify the material omissions.
Read the worked answer
No. A seal certifies that the licensed professional prepared or directly supervised the work and takes responsibility for it. You did not prepare or supervise the 28-sheet set or the drone DSM processing. Signing without a documented review and technical control would misrepresent your role and could violate the responsible-charge statute. The material omissions matter independently: the wetland-buffer encroachment is a design and permitting issue that the drawings show, and the 0.6 m boundary overlap is a boundary discrepancy that an ALTA survey should disclose. Calling the overlap a “title company problem” does not remove your duty to show observed evidence of boundary conflict. You may seal only work you performed and reviewed, or take responsible charge after a genuine review with defined scope and verification.
2. What options do you have before the Friday deadline?
Read the worked answer
You can decline to seal the full set and explain why in writing. You can offer a limited certification of the survey sheets or survey data you prepared and reviewed, with clear exclusions for the design and the DSM. You can require the developer to engage a licensed engineer for the construction design and a qualified professional for the drone mapping, and to have the boundary overlap addressed by title counsel. If you are asked to review the set, define the scope, check the DSM accuracy and the boundary and wetland lines, and document your review. Do not let the deadline force a signature you cannot support. A short written refusal with reasons is better than a sealed set that misstates your responsibility.
3. What ethical and regulatory duties are engaged, and how should you communicate your decision?
Read the worked answer
The duties engaged are competence, honesty, public safety, and compliance with the licensing law. You must not seal work outside your responsible charge, and you must not omit known boundary discrepancies from a survey deliverable. Communicate in writing: state what you did and did not prepare, what you reviewed, what discrepancies you found, and what you can and cannot certify. Preserve the request and your response. If the client insists on a false certification, refuse and consider whether the circumstances require reporting to the licensing board. Removing the overlap from the notes would be a misrepresentation, not a client-service choice.