Power-of-Attorney Limit and an Elderly Indemnitor
Caleb wants a $75,000 appearance bond for his nephew. His insurer's power of attorney authorizes him to execute bonds up to $50,000 per defendant and $150,000 aggregate. Caleb writes the $75,000 bond anyway, telling himself the aggregate limit covers it. The indemnitor is Caleb's 78-year-old neighbor, Helen, who signs a collateral agreement pledging her paid-off house, worth about $95,000. Helen's daughter later says Helen has mild dementia and did not understand. The nephew is convicted and sentenced to prison; the court exonerates the bond at sentencing. Helen demands release of the lien and a refund of the $7,500 premium. Caleb says the premium is earned and the lien stays until "all costs are done."
1. Was Caleb authorized to execute the $75,000 bond? Analyze the power-of-attorney limit and the aggregate limit.
Read the worked answer
No. A power of attorney grants specific authority; the per-defendant limit is not overridden by the aggregate limit. If the power of attorney says up to $50,000 per defendant, a $75,000 bond exceeds actual authority. The bond may still bind the surety to the court if the surety clothed Caleb with apparent authority, but as between Caleb, the agency, and the insurer, he violated the appointment and the power of attorney. The insurer can decline the risk, terminate the appointment, and report the matter. The aggregate limit is a ceiling on total exposure, not permission to write any single bond above the per-bond limit. Caleb should have obtained a special power of attorney or written the bond through an authorized agent.
2. Helen's daughter alleges mild dementia and lack of understanding. What duties did Caleb have at signing, and what should he do now?
Read the worked answer
An indemnitor must have capacity and understand the obligation. Caleb had a duty to explain the collateral pledge, the premium, the duration, and the risk to the house, and to ensure Helen signed voluntarily. A 78-year-old pledging a $95,000 home for a $75,000 bond is a high-impact transaction; a reasonable agent should slow down, encourage independent advice, and document the conversation. "Mild dementia" is not a legal conclusion, but the allegation triggers a duty to investigate. He should preserve the signed documents and notes, avoid pressure, and refer the matter to the insurer and counsel. If capacity was lacking, the agreement may be voidable and the lien must be released.
3. The court exonerates the bond at sentencing. Must Caleb refund the $7,500 premium and release the lien? Explain.
Read the worked answer
The lien should be released because the surety's exposure ended when the court exonerated the bond; continuing to hold the house after exoneration is unjustified. Premium is different: once the bond was executed and the risk ran, the premium is generally earned and not refundable merely because the case ended earlier than expected, unless the contract or filed rate provides otherwise. Caleb must distinguish the two. He should obtain a certified copy of the exoneration, prepare a release of the deed of trust, and return any collateral not applied to authorized obligations. He should provide a written accounting. Saying the lien stays "until all costs are done" after exoneration is likely bad faith.