First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.
Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.
Question 1Civil Procedure
A plaintiff files suit in Kansas state district court and serves the defendant with a summons that omits the deadline for filing an answer. Under Kansas civil procedure, what is the primary consequence of a defect in the summons form?
- Service is void and the plaintiff must obtain leave to serve again.
- The court must dismiss the case without prejudice upon the defendant's motion.
- The clerk automatically reissues a corrected summons and restarts the answer clock.
- The defect is cured if the defendant has actual notice and suffers no prejudice. Correct answer.
Explanation
Kansas follows a notice-based approach to process defects: when the defendant receives actual notice and the defect causes no prejudice, courts generally treat the irregularity as harmless and allow amendment or disregard it. A technical omission alone does not void service. The focus is on whether the defendant was fairly apprised of the action and the obligation to respond.
Question 2Civil Procedure
Which Kansas statute governs the time within which a civil action must be commenced, setting the general period for actions not otherwise specifically limited?
- K.S.A. 60-241
- K.S.A. 60-206
- K.S.A. 60-511 Correct answer.
- K.S.A. 60-252
Explanation
K.S.A. 60-511 supplies the general five-year limitations period for actions on written contracts and for actions not otherwise specifically limited by statute. The other cited provisions address different procedural subjects such as time computation, dismissal, and findings of fact. Recognizing the correct statute number is a standard recall point for Kansas civil practice.
Question 3Civil Procedure
In a Kansas district court civil case, a party wants to amend its pleading once as a matter of course before the opposing party has responded. Under K.S.A. 60-215, when may the party amend without leave of court?
- Only after the scheduling conference and entry of a scheduling order.
- Only with the written consent of the opposing party.
- At any time before the final pretrial conference regardless of prior amendments.
- Within 21 days after service of the pleading, if no responsive pleading is required or before a responsive pleading is served. Correct answer.
Explanation
K.S.A. 60-215 follows the federal model: a party may amend once as a matter of course within 21 days after serving the pleading if a responsive pleading is not required, or before being served with a responsive pleading if one is required. After that window, leave of court or written consent is needed. This rule preserves an early opportunity to correct pleadings without motion practice.
Question 4Civil Procedure
A Kansas plaintiff properly serves a defendant with a petition and summons. Under K.S.A. 60-212, how many days does the defendant generally have to file an answer or pre-answer motion after service?
- 14 days
- 10 days
- 21 days Correct answer.
- 30 days
Explanation
Kansas gives a defendant 21 days after service of the summons and petition to respond by answer or by motion under K.S.A. 60-212. This differs from the federal 21-day period following service, but the practical deadline is similarly keyed to service. Missing the deadline exposes the defendant to default.
Question 5Civil Procedure
A defendant in Kansas state court wishes to challenge personal jurisdiction and also assert that the petition fails to state a claim. If the defendant files a motion raising both grounds together, what is the effect on the personal jurisdiction defense?
- The defense is preserved only if the defendant pleads it again in the answer.
- The defense is converted into a motion to transfer venue.
- The defense is preserved because it was raised in the first responsive motion. Correct answer.
- The defense is waived because it was joined with other motions.
Explanation
Under K.S.A. 60-212, a party may consolidate defenses in a single pre-answer motion without waiving any of them, so raising lack of personal jurisdiction alongside a failure-to-state-a-claim defense preserves the jurisdictional objection. Waiver occurs when a party omits the defense from its first motion or answer. Consolidation is expressly permitted.
Question 6Civil Procedure
In Kansas, a party served with interrogatories must generally respond within how many days after service, absent a stipulation or court order?
- 15 days
- 30 days Correct answer.
- 20 days
- 45 days
Explanation
K.S.A. 60-233 sets a 30-day period after service for responding to interrogatories, mirroring the federal approach. The responding party must answer or object in writing within that window unless the court orders otherwise or the parties stipulate to a different deadline. Late responses can waive objections.
Question 7Civil Procedure
A Kansas litigant receives a request for production of documents. Which statement best describes the proper response if the party believes some documents are privileged?
- The party may ignore the request entirely if any document is privileged.
- The party must deliver the documents to the court for in camera review before responding.
- The party must produce all documents and later move to seal the privileged ones.
- The party must serve a written response asserting the privilege and may withhold the privileged documents. Correct answer.
Explanation
Under K.S.A. 60-234, a party responds in writing to each item and may withhold material it claims is privileged, ordinarily describing the withheld material so the claim can be evaluated. The party must not simply ignore the request, nor is pre-production court review required as a routine matter. Asserting the privilege in the response preserves the objection.
Question 8Civil Procedure
A plaintiff in Kansas state court wants to take the deposition of a nonparty witness. What is generally required to compel the witness's attendance?
- A notice of deposition served only on the parties.
- Written consent from the witness's employer.
- A court order signed by the judge in every instance.
- A subpoena served on the witness, with any required fees tendered. Correct answer.
Explanation
A nonparty must be compelled to attend a deposition by subpoena under K.S.A. 60-245, and the party generally must tender the witness fee and mileage required by statute. Notice to the parties alone does not bind a nonparty. A court order is not needed for a routine subpoena.
Question 9Civil Procedure
Which standard governs a Kansas district court's ruling on a motion for summary judgment under K.S.A. 60-256?
- The court grants judgment only if there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. Correct answer.
- The court weighs the evidence and grants judgment if the movant's evidence is more persuasive.
- The court grants judgment if the nonmovant fails to appear at the hearing.
- The court grants judgment whenever the pleadings alone show a dispute.
Explanation
Kansas summary judgment mirrors the federal standard: the movant must show the absence of a genuine issue of material fact and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, viewing evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant. The court does not weigh credibility or resolve factual disputes. Pleadings alone rarely suffice to defeat or support the motion.
Question 10Civil Procedure
A Kansas jury returns a verdict, and a party believes the evidence was insufficient to support it. Which post-trial motion asks the court to set aside the verdict and enter judgment for the movant?
- Motion for relief from judgment
- Motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict Correct answer.
- Motion to reconsider discovery
- Motion for a new trial
Explanation
A motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, now often called a renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law, asks the court to disregard the jury's verdict because the evidence could not reasonably support it. A new trial motion seeks a fresh trial rather than entry of judgment for the movant. The other motions address different concerns.
Question 11Civil Procedure
In Kansas, which rule governs relief from a final judgment based on mistake, newly discovered evidence, or fraud?
- K.S.A. 60-259
- K.S.A. 60-262
- K.S.A. 60-260 Correct answer.
- K.S.A. 60-265
Explanation
K.S.A. 60-260 is Kansas's analog to Federal Rule 60 and provides the grounds and time limits for relief from a final judgment or order, including mistake, newly discovered evidence, and fraud. K.S.A. 60-259 addresses new trials and amendment of judgments. The other provisions concern different subjects.
Question 12Civil Procedure
A Kansas plaintiff seeks to appeal a district court's final judgment. Which court generally hears the appeal first?
- The federal district court for the District of Kansas
- The district court sitting en banc
- The Kansas Court of Appeals, subject to exceptions and transfer Correct answer.
- The Kansas Supreme Court in all civil cases
Explanation
Appeals from Kansas district courts generally go to the Kansas Court of Appeals, with certain categories reserved for or transferred to the Kansas Supreme Court. The federal district court has no appellate jurisdiction over state court judgments. The district court does not sit en banc to review itself.
Question 13Civil Procedure
A Kansas defendant is served by publication in a case involving an in rem interest in Kansas real property. What constitutional limit applies to the resulting judgment?
- The judgment may affect the defendant's interest in the property but cannot impose personal liability. Correct answer.
- The judgment binds the defendant personally only if the defendant later appears.
- The judgment is void because publication service is never permitted.
- The judgment may bind the defendant personally for the full amount claimed.
Explanation
Service by publication consistent with due process may support a judgment affecting the defendant's interest in property located in Kansas, but it does not support personal liability because the defendant lacked minimum contacts sufficient for in personam jurisdiction. This reflects the in rem/in personam distinction. Personal liability requires a basis for personal jurisdiction and adequate notice.
Question 14Civil Procedure
A Kansas plaintiff files suit in the wrong county. The defendant believes venue is improper but makes no objection in the answer or in a pre-answer motion. What is the likely result?
- The judgment is void for lack of venue.
- The court must transfer the case on its own motion.
- The objection may be raised for the first time on appeal.
- The venue objection is waived. Correct answer.
Explanation
Improper venue is a waivable defense under K.S.A. 60-212(h): if the defendant omits it from a pre-answer motion or the answer, it is generally waived. Venue defects do not render a judgment void, and the court is not obliged to transfer sua sponte. Preservation requires a timely objection.
Question 15Civil Procedure
A Kansas party wants to join an additional claim against the opposing party arising from the same transaction as the original claim. Under K.S.A. 60-218, what is the nature of counterclaims arising from the same transaction?
- Permissive, so the party may choose to bring it later in a separate action.
- Compulsory, so it must be asserted or it is generally barred in a later action. Correct answer.
- Available only if the opposing party consents.
- Prohibited unless the court grants leave.
Explanation
K.S.A. 60-218 treats a counterclaim arising out of the same transaction or occurrence as compulsory: it must be pleaded in the pending action or the party risks being barred from asserting it later. Permissive counterclaims, by contrast, may be brought but need not be. The rule encourages resolution of related disputes in one proceeding.
Question 16Civil Procedure
A Kansas plaintiff wishes to add a new party defendant after the statute of limitations has run. Which doctrine may allow the amendment to relate back to the original filing date?
- Doctrine of equitable tolling
- Doctrine of forum non conveniens
- Relation-back doctrine under K.S.A. 60-215(c) Correct answer.
- Doctrine of laches
Explanation
K.S.A. 60-215(c) provides that an amendment changing a party relates back to the original pleading when the claim arises from the same conduct and the new party received notice and knew or should have known of the action. This relation-back doctrine can defeat a limitations defense. Equitable tolling is a separate concept and laches is an equitable defense.
Question 17Civil Procedure
In Kansas, a party who fails to respond to a request for admission within the allotted time faces what consequence?
- The request is automatically withdrawn.
- The matter is deemed admitted. Correct answer.
- The court imposes a monetary sanction automatically.
- The requesting party must file a motion to compel.
Explanation
Under K.S.A. 60-236, a matter is admitted unless the party serves a written answer or objection within 30 days of service. Deemed admissions can be used at trial and may support summary judgment. A motion to compel is not a prerequisite to the admission taking effect.
Question 18Civil Procedure
A Kansas court is asked to dismiss a case on the ground of forum non conveniens. What is the central inquiry?
- Whether the pleadings state a claim upon which relief can be granted.
- Whether the defendant has waived personal jurisdiction.
- Whether another forum is substantially more appropriate and the interests of justice favor transfer or dismissal. Correct answer.
- Whether the plaintiff filed within the limitations period.
Explanation
Forum non conveniens asks whether a substantially more appropriate forum exists and whether the interests of justice and convenience of the parties favor litigating there. It is distinct from limitations, jurisdiction, and failure to state a claim. The court weighs private and public interest factors.
Question 19Civil Procedure
Which of the following best describes the function of a scheduling order under K.S.A. 60-216 in a Kansas civil case?
- It automatically dismisses claims not listed in the order.
- It replaces the need for a pretrial conference in all cases.
- It serves as the final judgment on the merits.
- It sets deadlines for amendments, discovery, and motions and limits the scope of later changes. Correct answer.
Explanation
A scheduling order under K.S.A. 60-216 establishes deadlines for joining parties, amending pleadings, completing discovery, and filing motions, and it may be modified only for good cause. It structures the litigation rather than deciding the merits. It does not dispense with the pretrial conference or dismiss unlisted claims.
Question 20Civil Procedure
A Kansas litigant seeks to compel a nonparty to produce documents. Which mechanism is proper?
- A request for admission served on the nonparty
- A notice of deposition duces tecum served only on the parties
- A subpoena duces tecum served on the nonparty Correct answer.
- A motion for summary judgment
Explanation
A subpoena duces tecum under K.S.A. 60-245 compels a nonparty to produce documents, and the subpoenaed person may object or move to quash. A notice of deposition binds only parties, and requests for admission are party-discovery devices. Summary judgment is unrelated to obtaining documents from a nonparty.
Question 21Constitutional Law
Under the Kansas Constitution, the legislative power of the state is vested in which body?
- The House of Representatives and the Senate of the Legislature of the State of Kansas Correct answer.
- The Kansas Corporation Commission
- The Governor acting with the advice of the Kansas Supreme Court
- The board of county commissioners of each county
Explanation
Article 2, Section 1 of the Kansas Constitution vests the legislative power in a House of Representatives and a Senate, together constituting the Legislature of the State of Kansas. The other bodies exercise executive, administrative, or local powers rather than the state's legislative authority.
Question 22Constitutional Law
Which court is established by the Kansas Constitution as the highest court of the state?
- The Kansas Supreme Court Correct answer.
- The district court of Shawnee County
- The Kansas Court of Tax Appeals
- The Kansas Court of Appeals
Explanation
Article 3 of the Kansas Constitution creates the Kansas Supreme Court as the state's highest judicial tribunal, with general administrative authority over the courts. The Court of Appeals and district courts are established by statute or by article 3 in subordinate roles.
Question 23Constitutional Law
The Kansas Bill of Rights provides that all political power is inherent in the people and that governments derive their just powers from which source?
- The authority of the federal government
- The consent of the governed Correct answer.
- The decree of the legislature
- The charter of the state's original counties
Explanation
Section 2 of the Kansas Bill of Rights declares that all political power is inherent in the people and that governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed. This is the state's foundational statement of popular sovereignty.
Question 24Constitutional Law
A Kansas statute proposes to fund public schools through a formula that treats students in different districts unequally. Which constitutional provision is most directly implicated?
- The prohibition on lotteries
- The right to bear arms
- The requirement of a balanced federal budget
- The guarantee of a suitable provision for finance of the educational interests of the state Correct answer.
Explanation
Article 6 of the Kansas Constitution directs the legislature to make suitable provision for finance of the educational interests of the state, and the Kansas Supreme Court has enforced this as a substantive duty. Claims about unequal school funding are analyzed under that education article rather than unrelated provisions.
Question 25Constitutional Law
A Kansas city adopts an ordinance banning all signs on residential property. A homeowner challenges it under the Kansas Constitution's protection of free speech. How should a court analyze the ordinance?
- Uphold it because municipalities may regulate property without any constitutional limit
- Apply heightened scrutiny because the ordinance restricts expressive activity Correct answer.
- Defer entirely to the city because zoning is a political question
- Strike it down only if the homeowner proves actual financial harm
Explanation
Section 11 of the Kansas Bill of Rights protects freedom of speech and press, and content-based or broadly prohibitory restrictions on expression trigger heightened judicial scrutiny. A total ban on residential signs burdens expressive activity and cannot be sustained on mere deference to local zoning authority.
Question 26Constitutional Law
In Kansas, the power to grant pardons and reprieves for state offenses is vested in which official?
- The Speaker of the House
- The Governor Correct answer.
- The Chief Justice of the Kansas Supreme Court
- The Attorney General
Explanation
Article 1, Section 7 of the Kansas Constitution grants the Governor the pardoning power, subject to procedures the legislature may prescribe. The other officials exercise judicial, prosecutorial, or legislative functions and have no clemency authority.
Question 27Constitutional Law
A Kansas legislator is arrested for a misdemeanor while the legislature is in session. Under the Kansas Constitution, which statement best describes the legislator's protection?
- The legislator is absolutely immune from arrest at all times
- Members are privileged from arrest during attendance at sessions except for treason, felony, or breach of the peace Correct answer.
- The legislator loses the seat automatically upon any arrest
- The legislator may be arrested only with the consent of the Governor
Explanation
Article 2, Section 22 of the Kansas Constitution provides that members are privileged from arrest during attendance at sessions of the legislature and in going to and returning from the same, except for treason, felony, or breach of the peace. A misdemeanor arrest may therefore fall outside the privilege depending on the circumstances.
Question 28Constitutional Law
Which body has the constitutional authority to try an impeachment of a Kansas statewide executive officer?
- The Kansas Senate Correct answer.
- A joint session of the legislature presided over by the Governor
- The Kansas Supreme Court sitting en banc
- The Kansas House of Representatives
Explanation
Under article 2 of the Kansas Constitution, the House has the power of impeachment and the Senate tries impeachments, with conviction requiring a supermajority. The Senate therefore functions as the tribunal for an impeached officer.
Question 29Constitutional Law
A Kansas statute is challenged as a 'special law' that singles out one named county for treatment not applicable to similarly situated counties. Which constitutional provision governs?
- The contracts clause
- The privileges and immunities clause of article 4
- The due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment only
- The Kansas Constitution's prohibition on special legislation where a general law can be made applicable Correct answer.
Explanation
Article 2, Section 17 of the Kansas Constitution prohibits special legislation in cases where a general law can be made applicable, and Kansas courts scrutinize classifications that arbitrarily single out localities. The federal due process clause may also apply, but the state provision directly addresses special laws.
Question 30Constitutional Law
Which of the following best describes the Kansas Constitution's requirement regarding the introduction of bills in the legislature?
- Every bill must be introduced by the Governor
- Bills may be introduced in either house, subject to constitutional procedures for passage Correct answer.
- Only the Senate may originate revenue bills
- Bills must be approved by the Supreme Court before introduction
Explanation
Article 2 of the Kansas Constitution sets out the procedures for introducing and passing bills, generally allowing introduction in either chamber with readings and majority votes required for passage. No pre-clearance by the Governor or courts is required for introduction.
Question 31Constitutional Law
A Kansas agency adjudicates a license revocation without giving the licensee notice or an opportunity to respond. Which constitutional guarantee is most directly violated?
- The due process requirement that no person be deprived of property without notice and hearing Correct answer.
- The prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment
- The right to a jury trial in civil cases
- The guarantee against self-incrimination
Explanation
Both the Kansas Bill of Rights and the Fourteenth Amendment require notice and a meaningful opportunity to be heard before the state deprives a person of a protected property or liberty interest, such as a professional license. Administrative adjudication must satisfy those procedural safeguards.
Question 32Constitutional Law
The Kansas Constitution's guarantee of freedom of religion is found primarily in which provision of the Bill of Rights?
- Section 7, concerning the right to bear arms
- Section 9, concerning searches and seizures
- Section 7, concerning religious liberty and the prohibition on establishing a religion Correct answer.
- Section 2, concerning political power
Explanation
Section 7 of the Kansas Bill of Rights protects the free exercise of religion and bars the state from establishing or preferring any religious sect. This provision supplies the state constitutional basis for both establishment and free-exercise claims.
Question 33Constitutional Law
A Kansas criminal defendant argues that a state statute allowing a jury of six in a felony case violates the Kansas Constitution. Which provision is most relevant?
- The right to trial by jury, which the Kansas Constitution preserves in criminal prosecutions Correct answer.
- The prohibition on ex post facto laws
- The provision on the state militia
- The guarantee of a republican form of government
Explanation
Section 5 of the Kansas Bill of Rights preserves the right to trial by jury, and Kansas courts assess whether statutory jury procedures comport with that guarantee. Ex post facto and republican-form provisions address different concerns entirely.
Question 34Constitutional Law
In Kansas, which branch possesses the power to propose amendments to the state constitution for ratification by the voters?
- The Legislature, by a two-thirds vote of each house Correct answer.
- The Attorney General
- The Kansas Supreme Court alone
- The Governor alone
Explanation
Article 14 of the Kansas Constitution allows the legislature to propose amendments, which must pass each house by a two-thirds vote and then be ratified by the electorate. Courts, the Governor, and the Attorney General have no independent power to propose amendments.
Question 35Constitutional Law
A Kansas county enacts a rule that burdens a religious practice without a showing of compelling interest. Under the Kansas Constitution's religious liberty provision, how is the rule most likely evaluated?
- It is valid if the rule is rationally related to any conceivable purpose
- It is invalid unless the county shows a compelling interest pursued by the least restrictive means Correct answer.
- It is invalid automatically because any burden on religion is forbidden
- It is valid because counties may regulate conduct without constitutional limits
Explanation
Kansas courts have applied strict scrutiny to state action that substantially burdens religious exercise, requiring a compelling governmental interest and narrow tailoring. A rule that burdens religious practice without such justification is unlikely to survive.
Question 36Constitutional Law
A Kansas statute retroactively increases the punishment for conduct that occurred before its enactment. Which constitutional principle does this most clearly violate?
- The equal protection guarantee
- The right to petition the government
- The prohibition on bills of attainder and ex post facto laws Correct answer.
- The contracts clause
Explanation
Both the Kansas Bill of Rights and the federal Constitution bar ex post facto laws, which include statutes that increase punishment for conduct after the fact. Retroactive penalty enhancements fit squarely within that prohibition.
Question 37Constitutional Law
A Kansas plaintiff sues a state agency for damages, and the agency asserts sovereign immunity. Which statement best reflects Kansas law?
- Sovereign immunity applies only to counties, not to the state
- The state may assert immunity except as waived by statute, such as the Kansas Tort Claims Act Correct answer.
- Sovereign immunity is abolished entirely by the Bill of Rights
- The state has waived all immunity for tort claims without limitation
Explanation
Kansas retains sovereign immunity except to the extent the legislature waives it, and the Kansas Tort Claims Act supplies a limited statutory waiver with exceptions. The state therefore may assert immunity unless a statute provides otherwise.
Question 38Constitutional Law
A Kansas municipality's ordinance conflicts directly with a state statute on the same subject. Which principle determines the outcome?
- The state statute prevails because municipal authority is subordinate to state law Correct answer.
- Municipal ordinances always prevail because they are more local
- The conflict is resolved by the Governor's veto power
- The Kansas Supreme Court must choose whichever is more recent
Explanation
Kansas municipalities exercise only delegated authority, so an ordinance that conflicts with state law is invalid under the doctrine that state law is supreme over local enactments. Recency or executive action does not resolve such a conflict.
Question 39Constitutional Law
Which of the following is true of the Kansas Constitution's provision on the right to bear arms as interpreted by Kansas courts?
- It applies only to the federal government
- It permits reasonable regulation while protecting the right to keep and bear arms Correct answer.
- It has been repealed by statute
- It creates an absolute right immune from any regulation
Explanation
Section 4 of the Kansas Bill of Rights protects the right to bear arms, and Kansas courts have recognized that the right is subject to reasonable regulation rather than being absolute. The provision remains part of the state constitution and has not been repealed.
Question 40Constitutional Law
A Kansas court must decide whether a legislative enactment violates the state constitution. Which standard of review does Kansas apply to most economic and social welfare legislation?
- No review at all
- Intermediate scrutiny requiring an important interest
- Strict scrutiny requiring a compelling interest
- Rational-basis review requiring only a reasonable relation to a legitimate purpose Correct answer.
Explanation
Kansas courts generally apply rational-basis review to economic and social welfare legislation, upholding statutes that bear a reasonable relation to a legitimate governmental purpose. Heightened scrutiny is reserved for fundamental rights and suspect classifications.
Question 41Contracts
Under the common law, which of the following is required for a valid acceptance of a bilateral offer?
- The offeree must communicate an unequivocal assent to the offer's terms. Correct answer.
- The offeree must perform the requested act before acceptance is effective.
- The offeree must sign a written memorandum reflecting the terms.
- The offeree must promise to consider the offer at a later date.
Explanation
A bilateral contract is formed by the exchange of promises, so acceptance occurs when the offeree communicates unequivocal assent to the offer. Performance is the mode of acceptance for a unilateral offer, not a bilateral one. A writing is required only where a statute such as the Statute of Frauds demands it.
Question 42Contracts
An offeror mails an offer stating that acceptance is effective only upon receipt of the offeree's signed acceptance. The offeree mails a signed acceptance that arrives three days later. When is the contract formed?
- When the offeree wrote the acceptance.
- When the offeree placed the acceptance in the mail.
- When the offeror receives the signed acceptance. Correct answer.
- When the offeror's offer was received by the offeree.
Explanation
The mailbox rule is a default rule that the offeror may displace by specifying a different mode or timing of acceptance. Because the offer expressly required receipt, acceptance is effective only when the signed acceptance reaches the offeror. The dispatch date and the date of drafting are therefore irrelevant.
Question 43Contracts
Which of the following best describes the preexisting duty rule?
- A moral obligation alone is sufficient consideration for a new promise.
- A promise to do what the promisor is already legally obligated to do lacks consideration. Correct answer.
- A promise to refrain from suing is always enforceable without additional consideration.
- Past consideration is adequate consideration if it is recited in writing.
Explanation
Consideration requires a bargained-for exchange of legal detriment, and performing or promising to perform an existing legal duty supplies no new detriment. The rule prevents a party from extracting extra payment for doing what it already owes. Exceptions exist, such as a promise to perform a duty owed to a third party or an honest dispute resolved by new consideration.
Question 44Contracts
A homeowner emails a contractor: 'I will pay you $10,000 to remodel my kitchen; this offer stays open until June 1.' The contractor does not pay anything for the promise. On May 1 the homeowner revokes. The contractor had not begun work. What is the result?
- The offer became a firm offer because it was in writing.
- The revocation is effective because no consideration supported the option. Correct answer.
- The offer became irrevocable because the contractor is a merchant.
- The revocation is ineffective because the offer was stated to stay open until June 1.
Explanation
A promise to keep an offer open is enforceable as an option only if supported by consideration, unless a statute such as UCC firm-offer rules applies. The UCC firm-offer rule covers merchants' signed writings for the sale of goods, and a kitchen remodeling contract is predominantly a services contract. Absent consideration or a statutory exception, the offeror may revoke before acceptance.
Question 45Contracts
Which acceptance is effective under the common law?
- 'I might be interested; send me more details.'
- 'I accept your offer exactly as stated.' Correct answer.
- 'I accept your offer to sell your car, provided you also include the snow tires.'
- 'Your price is too high; I accept only if you reduce it by $500.'
Explanation
The common law mirror image rule requires acceptance to match the offer exactly; an unconditional assent is effective. A purported acceptance that adds or changes terms is a counteroffer, which operates as a rejection and terminates the original power of acceptance. A request for information or a conditional expression of interest is not acceptance.
Question 46Contracts
A seller and buyer sign a writing sufficient to satisfy the Statute of Frauds for the sale of land. Later they orally agree to change the purchase price. Under the common law, what is the effect of the oral modification?
- The oral modification is unenforceable under the Statute of Frauds unless a writing satisfies it. Correct answer.
- The oral modification is enforceable because modifications never require consideration.
- The oral modification automatically rescinds the entire contract.
- The oral modification is enforceable because the original writing satisfies the Statute of Frauds.
Explanation
When a contract falls within the Statute of Frauds, a material modification must itself satisfy the Statute of Frauds to be enforceable. The original writing does not cure the absence of a writing for the changed terms. Consideration is a separate requirement, and a modification does not rescind the whole contract.
Question 47Contracts
Which of the following promises is enforceable despite the absence of consideration?
- A promise made in reliance on a past favor.
- A promise to pay a debt barred by the statute of limitations. Correct answer.
- A promise to make a gift of $5,000 next year.
- A promise to pay a bonus for work already completed.
Explanation
A new promise to pay a debt barred by the statute of limitations is enforceable without new consideration in most jurisdictions. The revival rests on the debtor's voluntary acknowledgment of the moral and legal obligation. Gift promises, past-consideration promises, and promises for work already done generally lack consideration.
Question 48Contracts
A party seeks to enforce an oral agreement to sell goods priced at $700. The parties are merchants and neither has sent a written confirmation. What is the most likely result under the UCC?
- The contract is enforceable because the UCC has no writing requirement.
- The contract is enforceable because the price is below $1,000.
- The contract is enforceable because merchants are exempt from the writing requirement.
- The contract is unenforceable under the UCC sale-of-goods writing requirement. Correct answer.
Explanation
UCC section 2-201 requires a writing for the sale of goods priced at $500 or more, unless an exception applies. With no signed writing and no merchant confirmation exchanged, the oral agreement is generally unenforceable. Exceptions such as specially manufactured goods, admission, payment, or receipt do not appear here.
Question 49Contracts
Which statement accurately describes the parol evidence rule?
- It applies only to contracts for the sale of goods.
- It bars evidence of prior or contemporaneous agreements that contradict a fully integrated writing. Correct answer.
- It permits oral evidence to contradict a written term whenever the parties are merchants.
- It bars all evidence of subsequent agreements modifying a written contract.
Explanation
The parol evidence rule excludes prior or contemporaneous oral or written statements that contradict or supplement a fully integrated agreement. It does not govern later agreements, which may modify the contract if supported by consideration or a UCC exception. It applies to contracts generally, not only to goods transactions.
Question 50Contracts
A minor signs a contract to purchase a used car and later disaffirms while still a minor. Which is the most accurate statement of the minor's obligation?
- The minor is bound because the seller acted in good faith.
- The minor may keep the car and recover the full price without returning anything.
- The minor may disaffirm but must return any remaining consideration in most jurisdictions. Correct answer.
- The minor must perform the contract because the car was a necessary.
Explanation
Contracts with minors are generally voidable at the minor's election, and upon disaffirmance the minor must return whatever consideration remains in the minor's possession. A car is generally not a necessary, so the necessity exception does not apply. Good faith of the adult party does not make the contract enforceable against the minor.