A narcotic prescription that does not add up
At 8 pm in a community pharmacy, a man presents a prescription for oral morphine solution for his elderly father with cancer pain. The prescription is on a prescriber's pad from a clinic in another governorate, is dated 12 days earlier, carries no patient name - only the words 'for my father' - and the quantity appears to have been altered, with a '1' added in front of '00 mL' in a different pen. The prescriber's telephone number is engaged and the clinic is closed. The man is polite but distressed, says his father has had no analgesia since yesterday, and asks you to 'just give it, he is dying'. The pharmacist also notices that the only stock on the shelf expires in 10 weeks. A colleague suggests taking the morphine home personally to the family.
1. Work through the legal and professional checks this prescription fails, and state what you would do at the counter.
Read the worked answer
Checks that fail:
- Patient identification. A controlled drug prescription must identify the patient. 'For my father' is not an identifiable patient, so the prescription cannot be lawfully dispensed to a named person.
- Alteration. A quantity that has been hand-altered in a different pen is not a valid prescription; the pharmacist must not 'correct' it, initial it, or interpret what was intended. An alteration voids the document as presented.
- Validity period and origin. Confirm against the current Kuwait MOH rules for controlled drugs, which set how long a controlled prescription remains valid and which prescribers may issue which schedules - a prescription 12 days old from another governorate may already fall outside those limits. Do not guess: check the current MOH controlled-drug circular and your pharmacy's SOP.
- Prescriber verification. Authenticity must be confirmed directly with the prescriber or clinic before supply.
What I would do at the counter:
- Politely explain that I cannot supply this prescription as it stands, without accusing him of forgery.
- Offer to telephone the prescriber myself when the clinic opens, and take his contact number.
- Do not retain, confiscate or destroy the prescription; return it or follow the local procedure for a suspected forged or altered prescription, and record the event (date, time, presentation, action taken, name of the person, whether police or MOH inspectorate were informed per local policy).
- Address the pain now: this is an emergency for the father. Direct him to the nearest emergency department or oncology/palliative service that can prescribe and supply urgently, or contact the on-call prescriber. Refusing the document is not the same as abandoning the patient.
- Reject the colleague's suggestion to deliver the morphine personally: taking a controlled medicine out of the pharmacy's custody, without a valid prescription and without a record, breaches custody and record-keeping requirements and exposes both of you.
2. What is your position on the near-expiry stock, and on the request to move it to a branch with a supply shortage?
Read the worked answer
Near-expiry stock: a product expiring in 10 weeks is still within shelf-life and may be dispensed, provided the full course will be completed before the expiry date and the patient is counselled. A single 100 mL bottle used within days is acceptable; a 3-month supply would not be.
Practical handling:
- Quarantine and label it clearly as short-dated, and apply first-expiry-first-out so it is used before longer-dated stock.
- If it is not used before expiry, remove it from dispensable stock on the expiry date, record the removal, and dispose of it through the approved controlled-waste route with a witness and documentation - never into general waste or the sink.
Transferring it to another branch: controlled drugs cannot simply be carried or transferred between pharmacies as ordinary stock. Any movement requires the authorisation and documentation prescribed by the MOH for controlled drugs (transfer note, quantities, signatures, registered storage at both ends) and is generally not something a pharmacist arranges informally to solve a shortage. My answer would be: do not move it; escalate the shortage through the official channel and document the refusal.
Reasoning: every one of these decisions turns on the same principle - the drug stays inside a documented chain of custody from receipt to destruction, and any gap in that chain is the pharmacist's liability, not the patient's.