The Overpayment Wire and the Missing Tractor
A 2019 John Deere 6155R tractor sold for $142,000 including a 10% buyer's premium on an online auction. The next morning an email from the high bidder's address says the company controller will wire $150,000 and asks the auction house to refund the $8,000 difference to a 'new' account because the original was closed. The office manager calls the number in the email signature, reaches a person who confirms, and sends the $8,000 by wire. The $150,000 wire arrives and the tractor is released to a trucker who shows a bill of lading. Nine days later the originating bank reverses the $150,000 as an unauthorized transfer from a compromised business account; the buyer's real email address says it never sent the wire. The tractor is gone. The consignor wants its $129,090 net.
1. Identify the red flags and explain when the funds should have been treated as final.
Read the worked answer
This is a textbook business-email-compromise pattern, and the funds were never final when released. The red flags are cumulative: an overpayment, a request to send the difference to a different account, urgency, and an email instruction rather than a verified change order. Calling the number in the email signature is not independent verification - the fraudster controls that number. The auctioneer should have called the buyer at a number from the signed contract or a published line and confirmed the overpayment and refund account in writing. A wire is not 'final' merely because it posts; fraudulent and unauthorized transfers can be reversed after the receiving bank is notified. Release of the tractor should have waited for final settlement confirmation from the auctioneer's bank and a title and possession release signed by the buyer. The bill of lading proves only that someone picked up the machine. The office manager also should not have sent a third-party refund at all; refunds go to the account of record.
2. Who bears the loss, and what should the auctioneer do now?
Read the worked answer
Loss allocation and immediate steps. The consignor is owed its net proceeds; it consigned in good faith and the auctioneer, as agent and bailee, took the payment risk it failed to manage. The auctioneer and its insurer will likely bear the loss, not the consignor. The auctioneer should notify its bank and insurer immediately, file a police report and an IC3 complaint, preserve all emails with headers, call recordings, wire instructions, and gate logs, and freeze any remaining funds. It should not take money from other clients' trust funds to pay the consignor; if the trust account is short, the firm must restore it from operating funds. The consignor should receive the net proceeds it was promised, with a written explanation, and the auctioneer should pursue the fraudster and the receiving bank. If the auctioneer cannot pay, it must disclose the shortfall and negotiate rather than stall. A Board complaint and E&O claim are likely either way.
3. What settlement controls should the firm adopt to prevent a repeat?
Read the worked answer
Settlement controls. Adopt a written funds-verification policy: no release of titled or high-value property until the bank confirms the wire is received and not subject to recall, with a defined hold for large transfers. Prohibit changes to remittance instructions by email; require a signed change form, callback to a known number, and dual approval. Refunds go only to the original payor account, never a third party. Match the wire sender name to the registered bidder and require the buyer's entity authorization. Use dual control on outgoing wires and a callback to the bank's known fraud line for large amounts. Keep a payment log with date, amount, bank confirmation number, and approver. Train staff that urgency and overpayment are fraud indicators, and give them authority to stop a transaction. For online-only sales, add bidder verification before the auction closes for lots above a threshold, and consider escrow or verified funds for six-figure equipment. Document the policy and retain the records; the Board will ask what controls existed before the loss, not just after.