Margaret's Replacement: Surrendering a Loan-Laden Whole Life Policy
Margaret, 62, owns a $150,000 whole life policy issued in 2009. It now has a $52,000 cash value, a $38,000 policy loan taken in 2019, and $54,000 of premiums paid over the years. Agent Dale proposes she surrender it and buy a $250,000 universal life policy with a $6,000 annual premium, using the $14,000 net surrender value toward the first-year premium. Dale hands her the replacement notice as she signs the application and says, "The free look covers you, so there's nothing to worry about." Margaret's goal is leaving money to two grandchildren; she is in good health on a fixed income of $3,100 a month and has no other life insurance.
1. What must Dale do before this application is submitted, and what did he do wrong?
Read the worked answer
Required steps (Kentucky replacement rules, modeled on the NAIC replacement regulation):
- Present and read the replacement notice to Margaret, have her sign it, and leave a copy with her.
- List every policy being replaced or altered on the form.
- Give her a policy summary/comparison so she can see guaranteed vs. assumed values.
- Submit the notice with the application so the replacing insurer notifies the existing insurer within the regulation's short window (the model rule uses five business days) and the old insurer can furnish a conservation notice.
- Disclose surrender charges, new contestability, and the new suicide clause.
What Dale did wrong: handing the notice over as she signs defeats the purpose - the point of reading it aloud is informed consent. Calling the free look a cure-all is misleading: Kentucky's free look (generally 10 days on a life policy, longer where replacement rules apply) lets her cancel the new policy, but it does not restore the 2009 policy's acquisition costs, loan history, or contestability status once surrendered. He also skipped the suitability comparison for a 62-year-old fixed-income client.
2. Is using the net surrender value to pay the first-year premium sound? Address tax, the loan, and suitability.
Read the worked answer
Tax: With $54,000 of basis against $52,000 of value, surrender produces no taxable gain - the $38,000 loan is simply netted against cash value. A 1035 exchange (life-to-life is permitted) would also be tax-free and would carry the $54,000 basis forward, so tax savings are not the deciding factor here; the basis is the only thing worth preserving.
The loan: If the contract is surrendered, the $38,000 loan is extinguished from the $52,000 cash value and Margaret nets $14,000. If it is exchanged, the loan must either be repaid or carried to the new policy, where it reduces the death benefit dollar-for-dollar and can cause the UL to lapse if costs rise.
Suitability: The $14,000 is not "free money" - it is equity she already owned, being spent on premium. The real trade is a guaranteed $150,000 death benefit for an illustrated $250,000 on a non-guaranteed UL, paid for by a client on a fixed income. A better-reasoned recommendation is to keep the old policy, repay or reduce the loan, and buy a small additional term or paid-up addition if more coverage is truly needed.
3. If Margaret proceeds, what downsides must be documented in the file?
Read the worked answer
- New contestability period: two years from the new issue date. If she dies in that window, the insurer can rescind based on the new application.
- New suicide clause: typically two years, restarting from zero.
- New surrender charge period on the UL, so early exit in years 1–10 costs her.
- Interest and mortality assumptions: UL is not guaranteed; the $250,000 face is only as durable as the premium and crediting assumptions. Show guaranteed-column values.
- Loss of the old policy's attained-age structure: she is now 62 and paying for insurance at 62, not 47.
- Documentation: a signed suitability statement, the comparison, and the reason the replacement outweighs the loss of the guaranteed contract are what protect the producer in a market-conduct review.