Robert's Claim: Misstated Age, Grace Period, and an Accidental Death Rider
Robert applied for a $200,000 whole life policy with a $200,000 accidental death benefit rider. On the application he gave a birth date that made him 47; his Social Security record shows he was actually 51. The policy was issued at a $4,800 annual premium, and the insurer's rate table shows $4,800 would have purchased $170,000 of coverage at age 51. Robert died of a heart attack on January 25, eighteen months after issue. The January 1 premium had not been paid; the policy contains a 31-day grace period. His daughter, the named beneficiary, submitted a claim for $400,000.
1. How much will the insurer pay, and on what contractual basis?
Read the worked answer
Step 1 - Is the policy in force? Yes. Death occurred on January 25, within the 31-day grace period that began January 1. Coverage continues during the grace period, but the overdue premium is a debt to the insurer.
Step 2 - Misstatement of age. This policy contains a misstatement-of-age provision: the benefit is adjusted to what the premium actually paid would have purchased at the correct age. $4,800 buys $170,000 at age 51, so the face amount becomes $170,000.
Step 3 - Net payment. $170,000 − $4,800 unpaid premium = $165,200, plus any dividend or interest adjustments the contract calls for.
Note that no interest is added for late payment of the premium unless the policy or state rule provides it; the grace period protects the death benefit, not the premium obligation.
2. The beneficiary also claims the $200,000 accidental death benefit. Is she entitled to it?
Read the worked answer
No. An accidental death benefit is a limited rider, not a duplicate of the base policy. Two conditions must both be met:
- Covered cause - death must result from accidental bodily injury, independent of sickness or disease. A myocardial infarction is a disease process, even though it is sudden and unexpected. "Unexpected" is not the same as "accidental."
- Time limit - even for a qualifying accident, the rider typically requires death within 90 days of the injury.
The rider pays $0 here. The beneficiary receives the adjusted base benefit only. If Robert had died in a car accident, the rider would have added its face amount on top of the adjusted base amount - riders follow the base policy's age adjustment, so the accidental benefit would have been reduced proportionally as well.
3. Could the insurer instead rescind the policy for misrepresentation, since death occurred within the contestable period?
Read the worked answer
It could raise the issue - 18 months is inside the two-year contestable period - but rescission is not the right remedy and would likely fail.
- Materiality: the misstatement was material (it underpriced the risk), but the contract supplies its own remedy for this exact error: the age-adjustment provision. Courts and regulators treat that provision as the bargained-for consequence, not something to be circumvented by rescission.
- Good faith: an honest transposition of a birth date is a clerical mistake; rescission generally requires a knowingly false answer to a question that was asked and that the insurer relied on.
- Practical result: the death benefit is reduced, which is the economic equivalent of putting the insurer in the position it would have occupied at the correct age. Rescission would return premiums and pay nothing, and a market-conduct examiner would view that as an overreach when the policy has a specific clause covering the situation.
The claim should be paid at $165,200, with a written explanation citing both the age-adjustment and grace-period provisions.