KY Opto Juris study materials
KY Opto Juris study resources

Borderline Glaucoma, Thin Corneas, Asthma, and a Pregnancy Plan

KY Opto Juris · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Borderline Glaucoma, Thin Corneas, Asthma, and a Pregnancy Plan

A 62-year-old woman is seen for a routine examination in a Kentucky practice whose optometrist holds glaucoma certification. She has no visual complaints. Goldmann applanation pressures are 25 mmHg OD and 24 mmHg OS; central corneal thickness is 498 µm OD and 503 µm OS. Optic discs show cup-to-disc ratios of 0.72 OD and 0.60 OS with slight inferior rim thinning OD and no hemorrhages. A 24-2 field shows a borderline inferior cluster of two points and a glaucoma hemifield test flag of 'borderline.' She has a mother with glaucoma, is a high myope, and takes an inhaled corticosteroid plus a beta-agonist for asthma; she mentions that she and her husband are trying to conceive. She asks, 'Can't you just give me the eye drops and save me a specialist visit? My insurance resets in three weeks and I can't pay out of pocket.' The practice is double-booked and the technician has already started dilation.

1. Is starting treatment here within this optometrist's privileges, and what must be documented before a first prescription?

Read the worked answer

Privileges are not the binding constraint; the workup is.

  • A glaucoma-certified Kentucky optometrist may diagnose and treat open-angle glaucoma, but treatment without a documented risk assessment and baseline data is indefensible either way - treat or observe.
  • Risk picture: IOP in the mid-20s with corneas under 505 µm implies higher true pressure; 0.12 of cup asymmetry with inferior thinning; a first-degree relative; high myopia. That is moderate-to-high conversion risk, but two field points and a borderline index are not a glaucomatous defect - they may be early damage or artifact.
  • Before any prescription: gonioscopy to confirm the angle is open (also mandatory before relying on a diagnosis of open-angle glaucoma), a full-threshold baseline field, optic nerve imaging or stereoscopic photos, blood pressure, and repeated pressure measurement at a different time of day.
  • The insurance-reset pressure is a financial constraint, not a clinical one; it can shape the follow-up interval but must never appear in the chart as the reason for treatment.
  • Document the risk calculation, the discussion of observation versus treatment, and the chosen interval. Observation with a 4-month recheck is a defensible plan if the reasoning is written down.

2. If she and the doctor decide to treat, which agent classes are problematic given her asthma and her pregnancy plans, and how would you proceed?

Read the worked answer

Eliminate the beta blocker; treat the prostaglandin as a discussion, not a default.

  • Topical beta blockers (timolol, levobunolol) are the clearest contraindication: even 'cardioselective' topical agents are systemically absorbed and can precipitate bronchospasm in a patient using inhaled beta-agonists and corticosteroids. Do not start one.
  • Prostaglandin analogs are the most effective first-line agent for IOP lowering, but pregnancy data are limited and most labeling is category C; for a patient actively trying to conceive, the risk-benefit conversation must be explicit, involve her obstetric clinician, and be documented. Periorbital fat atrophy and iris darkening also deserve mention.
  • Alpha agonists cause fatigue and dry mouth and are best avoided in young children; carbonic anhydrase inhibitors warrant caution with sulfonamide sensitivity; pilocarpine is poorly tolerated and not first line.
  • A reasonable framing: if she wants to avoid chronic medication through a pregnancy, selective laser trabeculoplasty (if within this clinician's privileges) or referral for laser is worth discussing; otherwise start the agent she and her obstetrician accept and record the discussion.

3. What are the objective triggers that should move this patient from office management to co-management or referral, and how should that be structured?

Read the worked answer

Set the triggers in advance so the decision is not made in the moment.

  • Refer or co-manage for: pressures persistently above the mid-20s despite therapy, progressive rim thinning or new hemorrhage, a reproducible field defect on repeat testing, an angle that gonioscopy shows to be narrow or closed, unreliable fields or a disc that cannot be evaluated, or a need for incisional surgery.
  • Structure: a written co-management agreement naming who measures pressure, who images, who renews, and who is accountable for the interval; a records-exchange routine so the specialist sees the actual images and fields, not a summary line; and an explicit statement to the patient of who to call for what.
  • Document her stated preferences (she wanted to avoid a specialist visit and out-of-pocket costs) and the counseling that explained why a referral may still be necessary - that record protects both the patient and the clinician.
  • Finally, confirm the practice's certification status permits the treatment being undertaken; if the clinician's glaucoma privileges did not cover it, the plan changes to referral from the outset.