Bakery Fire: Coinsurance, Business Income, and Code Upgrade
A bakery-restaurant has a fire that closes operations for four months. The commercial property policy has a building limit of $1,000,000, replacement cost $1,500,000, 80% coinsurance, a $5,000 deductible, and business income coverage of $600,000 for a 12-month period. The building loss is $300,000. The insured's projected monthly sales are $120,000, with a 35% gross profit margin and $20,000 per month in continuing normal operating expenses. A temporary location costs $9,000 per month in extra expense. The local code official requires a new hood suppression system, a $40,000 upgrade that was not in the original estimate. The insured also wants the public adjuster to include lost customers for six months after reopening, although the policy has no extended business income endorsement.
1. Calculate the building claim payment after coinsurance and deductible, showing each step.
Read the worked answer
Coinsurance is tested at the time of loss. The required limit is 80% × $1,500,000 = $1,200,000. The carried limit is $1,000,000. The coinsurance ratio is $1,000,000 ÷ $1,200,000 = 0.8333. The building loss is $300,000, so the coinsurance-adjusted payment is $300,000 × 0.8333 = $250,000. Then subtract the $5,000 deductible: $245,000. The insured is a coinsurer for the $50,000 shortfall plus the deductible, so the total out-of-pocket is $55,000. The PA should verify the replacement cost value and the coinsurance percentage, because if the $1,500,000 figure includes foundations or items not subject to coinsurance, the required limit may be lower. The PA should also check whether the policy uses a margin clause or agreed value, which would change the calculation.
2. Analyze the business income and extra expense claim for the four-month closure, including the six-month lost-customer request.
Read the worked answer
Business income is based on the actual loss during the period of restoration, not on the annual limit alone. Gross profit is $120,000 × 35% = $42,000 per month. For four months, the lost gross profit is $168,000 before considering continuing expenses and any saved costs. Continuing normal operating expenses of $20,000 per month may be included if they continued during the shutdown and are not otherwise saved; the PA must avoid double counting if the 35% gross profit figure already accounts for them. Extra expense of $9,000 per month for four months is $36,000, and extra expense is generally paid in addition to business income to the extent it reduces the loss. The six-month lost-customer claim is not covered without an extended business income endorsement; the standard period ends when the property could be repaired with reasonable speed, not when sales fully recover. The PA should document the restoration timeline, payroll, fixed costs, and temporary-location invoices.
3. How should the ordinance-or-law upgrade be presented, and what policy language controls?
Read the worked answer
The ordinance-or-law upgrade is controlled by the policy's ordinance or law coverage, usually a separate limit or percentage for undamaged portions, demolition, and increased cost of construction. The $40,000 hood suppression upgrade is likely an increased cost of construction required by code after the fire. If the policy has no ordinance-or-law coverage or the limit is exhausted, the insured bears the shortfall. The PA should obtain the code citation, the inspector's written order, and a contractor's breakdown separating code-required work from the fire repair. The PA should not bury the upgrade in the general building estimate. If the policy includes 10% ordinance or law, the available limit may be 10% of the building limit, but the PA must confirm the form. The claim should be presented as a separate item with its own limit analysis and any applicable deductible.