Forced Heirship and the Disposable Portion in a Louisiana Will
Elias died in 2023 domiciled in Orleans Parish. His validly executed will leaves $600,000 to the New Orleans Museum of Art and $300,000 to his son Paul, age 30, in trust. The will says that his daughter Simone, age 22, receives nothing because she 'has chosen a lifestyle he cannot approve.' Elias's estate consists of $900,000 of separate immovable property; there is no community property. Simone is not permanently incapacitated, is not married, and has no children. Paul is married and has one child. Simone files a petition to assert her forced heirship. The museum argues that the will is valid because Elias had testamentary freedom and because Simone is over the age of majority. Paul argues that the trust for his benefit should be funded before any distribution to Simone. The executor asks how to distribute the estate.
1. Is Simone a forced heir, and what is the forced portion of Elias's estate?
Read the worked answer
Simone is a forced heir. Under La. C.C. art. 1493, descendants of the first degree are forced heirs if they are 23 or younger at the decedent's death or are permanently incapacitated. Simone is 22 and has no incapacity; Paul is 30, so he is not a forced heir. Because Elias is survived by one forced heir, the legitime is one-half of the estate under La. C.C. art. 1497; the disposable portion is the other half. The estate is $900,000, so Simone's forced portion is $450,000 and the disposable portion is $450,000. The will's statement that Simone receives nothing is a disinherison. Disinherison is valid only for a just cause listed in the Civil Code and must be executed in a testament; disapproval of Simone's lifestyle is not one of the listed causes. Even if the clause were valid, Simone could reduce the excessive legacies to recover her legitime. The museum's testamentary-freedom argument fails because forced heirship limits the disposable portion.
2. How should the executor distribute the $900,000 estate, and does Paul's trust take priority?
Read the worked answer
Simone takes her $450,000 legitime in full ownership, free of the trust. The remaining $450,000 is disposable and passes under the will. The will purports to give $600,000 to the museum and $300,000 to Paul in trust, total $900,000, so the legacies must abate by $450,000. Absent a residuary clause or contrary will provision, the two general money legacies abate ratably: the museum receives $300,000 and Paul's trust receives $150,000. Paul's trust is funded only after the forced portion is satisfied; the trust cannot be funded first. Paul's child takes nothing because Paul is alive and is not a forced heir; a grandchild does not represent Paul while Paul is alive. The executor should pay Simone $450,000, pay the museum $300,000, and fund Paul's trust with $150,000.