LA Chiro Juris study materials
LA Chiro Juris study resources

Saturday DWI, Monday Patients, and a Colleague in the Suite

LA Chiro Juris · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Saturday DWI, Monday Patients, and a Colleague in the Suite

On a Saturday night, Dr. B, a 38-year-old chiropractor with a solo practice, is arrested for driving while intoxicated. His blood alcohol concentration is 0.14. He is released on Sunday with a court date in six weeks. On Monday morning he arrives at the office smelling of alcohol, slurring slightly, and tells his office manager he "only had a couple" and can see his nine scheduled patients. A chiropractic colleague who shares the suite sees him stumble and hears him tell a patient he will "crack that neck good." The colleague knows Dr. B has been going through a divorce and has no backup coverage. Dr. B has not reported the arrest to the Board. The colleague is not Dr. B's employer and does not want to "ruin his life," but is worried about the patients. One patient is a 72-year-old woman on blood thinners; another is a 14-year-old with headaches.

1. What should the colleague do before any patients are treated?

Read the worked answer

Patient safety comes first. The colleague should intervene immediately, not wait to see whether Dr. B "gets through" the day. Signs of impairment-odor of alcohol, slurred speech, stumbling-combined with a recent DWI arrest create a reasonable concern that Dr. B cannot safely perform adjustments, especially on a patient taking blood thinners and a minor with headaches. The colleague should take Dr. B aside, tell him he appears impaired, and insist that he not treat patients.

The practical steps are to arrange coverage by an actively licensed chiropractor, reschedule or refer patients, and document what was observed and what actions were taken. If Dr. B refuses to stop, the colleague may need to escalate to the Board or emergency services depending on the risk. The colleague should not diagnose Dr. B or disclose his medical information broadly, but patient safety justifies reporting the impairment concern to the Board. Protecting patients is not "ruining his life"; allowing impaired practice could harm patients and expose both chiropractors to liability.

2. What are Dr. B's obligations to the Board and to his patients?

Read the worked answer

Dr. B should stop practicing while impaired and arrange coverage for his patients. He should self-report the arrest and any conviction or license action as required by Board rules and should cooperate with the Board's investigation. Waiting for a court date does not resolve the practice risk; the Board can act on impairment or unprofessional conduct independently of the criminal case. He should seek a substance-use assessment and follow any impaired-practitioner program or conditions the Board imposes.

With respect to patients, he does not necessarily need to disclose his personal circumstances to every patient, but he must not abandon them. The practice should notify patients of schedule changes or coverage in a professional manner. Records should be accurate and should not omit the fact that treatment was unavailable. If he treated patients while impaired, those records and any adverse events should be reviewed carefully. Self-reporting and early rehabilitation are generally more defensible than concealment, but he should consult counsel about the timing and scope of disclosures.

3. How does a DWI arrest relate to chiropractic discipline, and what process should be expected?

Read the worked answer

A DWI arrest is not automatically a chiropractic practice violation, but it can become one. The Board's concern is whether the conduct shows impairment, unfitness, or risk to patients, and whether a conviction or plea falls within the grounds for discipline. The Board may investigate, request information, and impose interim measures if it believes patients are at risk. The licensee is entitled to notice and an opportunity to respond, and formal discipline generally requires a hearing or a settlement with due-process protections.

Possible outcomes range from dismissal or a private remedial plan to suspension, probation, or other conditions, depending on the facts and the Board's rules. The criminal case and the administrative case are separate: a criminal dismissal does not automatically end the Board inquiry, and a conviction can be used as evidence. Dr. B should not assume the matter is private because it happened off duty. The colleague's report and any patient-safety concerns will likely shape the Board's urgency, so early cooperation and documented rehabilitation are important.