LA Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence study materials
LA Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence study resources

The Lapsed License and the Friday Recall

LA Dental Hygiene Jurisprudence · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Lapsed License and the Friday Recall

On January 2, a dental hygienist reports to her Baton Rouge office and, over the next three weeks, treats 41 patients. Her Louisiana license renewal was due December 31, and she assumed the practice manager had paid it. On January 23 she submits a renewal application and checks the box attesting to 20 continuing education hours, although her folder contains certificates for only 14. On January 24 a patient calls with severe sensitivity after scaling and root planing. The front-desk coordinator checks the Board's license verification and finds the hygienist's status listed as 'expired.' The dentist tells the hygienist to 'keep working-the paperwork will catch up,' and the office manager asks her to backdate the renewal form to December 31 so the late filing will not appear late. The hygienist has no prior discipline and has worked at the practice for eight years.

1. What must the hygienist do immediately, and why?

Read the worked answer

She must stop providing clinical care until the Board shows an active license. A license is a legal authorization to practice; expiration is not cured by an employer's promise to pay or by a pending renewal. Continuing to treat patients is unlicensed practice and exposes the dentist to discipline for aiding and abetting. Immediate steps: (1) tell the dentist and office manager in writing that she is ceasing clinical duties; (2) verify her status on the Board's licensee lookup and keep a screenshot; (3) contact the Board about reinstatement or renewal and any late fee; (4) review the 41 patients treated after expiration and ensure each has a follow-up plan; (5) do not alter any record or the renewal form. Because the patient with sensitivity is already reporting a problem, she should ensure the dentist examines the patient and documents the post-treatment course. She should also preserve her CE certificates and a timeline of who told her what.

2. Evaluate the dentist's instruction and the backdating request.

Read the worked answer

The dentist's instruction to 'keep working' is not a defense. The supervising dentist may not delegate to or employ a person whose license is expired; doing so is a separate violation and undermines the public-protection purpose of licensure. The backdating request is worse: changing the date on a renewal form makes a false statement of fact to a licensing board. Even if the hygienist had actually completed the CE, backdating would be dishonest; here it would also conceal the CE shortfall. She should refuse clearly, document the request in a contemporaneous note or email to herself, and not sign anything she knows is inaccurate. If the office retaliates, that is relevant to a Board complaint but does not change her duty. A licensee's obligation is to the Board and the public, not to the employer's convenience.

3. What are likely Board consequences, and how does the CE deficiency factor?

Read the worked answer

The Board can open a complaint and investigate both unlicensed practice and the false attestation. Possible outcomes range from a reprimand and civil penalty to suspension or probation, depending on harm, duration, prior discipline, and cooperation. The CE deficiency is not just a paperwork problem: Louisiana conditions renewal on completion of the required hours, so the renewal may be incomplete even apart from the false statement. She should complete the missing hours immediately, keep certificates, and disclose the shortfall to the Board rather than waiting for an audit. Voluntary correction and candor often matter in disposition, but they do not erase the period of expired practice. The patient's sensitivity complaint should be handled clinically and documented; it may become evidence in the Board matter.