The Fleeing Suspect and the Force Decision
You are a solo officer at 2100 hours in a residential neighborhood. You see a man matching the description of a burglary suspect - 6 feet tall, dark hoodie, carrying a backpack - walking fast. When you say 'Hey, can I talk to you?' he runs. You chase on foot. He is 30 feet ahead, jumping a fence into a backyard. You see him reach into his waistband. You have not seen a weapon. He is not suspected of a violent crime; the burglary was of an unoccupied garage. You are 25 years old and in good shape. Backup is 4 minutes out.
1. Can you use deadly force here? Walk through the analysis.
Read the worked answer
Graham v. Connor framework: Deadly force must be objectively reasonable given the threat. The key question is whether the suspect poses an immediate threat of death or serious bodily injury to you or others.
Facts that cut against deadly force:
- The underlying crime is a burglary of an unoccupied garage - property crime, not violent.
- You have not seen a weapon.
- He is fleeing, not attacking.
- Reaching into a waistband is ambiguous; people adjust clothing while running.
Facts that cut toward caution:
- Waistband reach in a fleeing suspect is a known risk cue. It justifies drawing your weapon and taking cover, not firing.
Tennessee v. Garner: Deadly force against a fleeing suspect is only justified where the officer has probable cause to believe the suspect poses a significant threat of death or serious physical injury. A garage burglar running away does not meet that bar.
Conclusion: No. Do not fire. Draw, take cover, and broadcast.
2. What do you do in the next 30 seconds?
Read the worked answer
Actions:
- Stop the chase at the fence. Do not follow blindly into a backyard with unknown layout and unknown occupants.
- Broadcast: direction of travel, clothing, backpack, fence line, and the waistband reach.
- Set a perimeter with the resources you have and wait for backup.
- Request a K9 or air unit if available.
Why stop: A solo foot chase into a fenced yard at night, against a suspect who may be armed, trades your safety for a property-crime arrest. The suspect is not an immediate danger to the public if he is running away.
If he turns and advances: That changes the analysis. Now you have a threat, and your force options expand accordingly.
3. How would you write this up, and what would you avoid saying?
Read the worked answer
Write:
- The initial observation and the match to the description.
- The exact words you used and his response.
- The flight, the fence, the waistband reach, and your decision to stop at the fence.
- The broadcast and perimeter.
Avoid:
- 'I feared for my life' with no supporting facts. That phrase is a conclusion, not an observation.
- Claiming he 'reached for a gun' when you only saw a hand go to the waistband.
- Omitting the decision to break off the chase. That decision is a good one and should be documented.
Why it matters: Your report is the record a reviewer will use to judge the reasonableness of your force decision. Facts, times, and words - not adjectives.