The Missing Evidence in the Burglary Case
You respond to a residential burglary. The homeowner says a laptop, a watch, and $400 cash are missing. A neighbor says she saw a man in a gray sedan in the driveway around 1400. You find a pry mark on the back door and a partial shoe print in the mud. You photograph the door and the print, collect a swab from the doorframe, and take the neighbor's statement. Two days later, the detective tells you the swab was never logged into evidence and the shoe print photo is missing from the file. The neighbor has since moved and left no forwarding address.
1. What are the chain-of-custody failures, and what are their consequences?
Read the worked answer
Failures:
- The swab was collected but never logged. Without an entry, there is no record of who handled it, when, or where it went. That breaks the chain.
- The shoe print photo is missing. The photo was the best record of the print; the print itself may be gone.
- The neighbor's statement exists but she is unavailable. Her statement is now harder to use if she cannot be located to testify.
Consequences:
- The swab may be inadmissible or given little weight.
- The photo loss weakens the link between the suspect and the scene.
- The case may still proceed on the pry mark and the homeowner's account, but the physical evidence is compromised.
Key point: Evidence you collect but do not log is evidence you did not collect.
2. What should you have done differently at the scene, and what can you do now?
Read the worked answer
At the scene:
- Log every item into evidence before leaving the scene, with time, item number, and your initials.
- Photograph the print with a scale and from multiple angles, and note the camera and file names.
- Get the neighbor's full contact information, including a phone number and an alternate contact.
Now:
- Do a written supplement explaining the gap honestly. Do not backdate or reconstruct a log entry.
- Check the camera or phone for deleted or misfiled photos.
- Try to locate the neighbor through utility or DMV records consistent with policy.
- Notify the detective in writing.
Do not: Create a log entry after the fact. That is a falsification issue, not a clerical one.
3. The detective asks you to 'fill in' the log so the case is not thrown out. How do you respond?
Read the worked answer
Refuse. Creating a log entry now, dated to the collection time, is falsifying a record. It can end your career and taint the case.
What to say: 'I can write a supplement explaining what happened and when, but I can't create a log entry that says I logged it that night. That would be false.'
Why it matters:
- A false log is a Brady and credibility problem for every case you touch.
- An honest supplement preserves the case's integrity even if the evidence is excluded.
- The detective's request may be pressure, not malice. Answer it with a clear, professional refusal and document the conversation.
Bottom line: The case may be weaker, but your integrity is not negotiable.