I85PREP
⌘ K
Louisiana POST Level 1 study materials
Louisiana POST Level 1 study resources

Louisiana POST Level 1 practice questions

One question at a time. Build your Louisiana POST Level 1 understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

Under Louisiana law, which body is primarily responsible for establishing minimum training standards for peace officers?

  1. The POST Council within the Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement Correct answer.
  2. Each individual parish sheriff's office
  3. The Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement
  4. The Louisiana State Police

Explanation

Louisiana's Peace Officer Standards and Training (POST) Council, housed within the Louisiana Commission on Law Enforcement, sets minimum training and certification standards for peace officers statewide. Individual agencies must meet these standards but do not set the statewide minimums themselves.

Question 2Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

The primary purpose of a law enforcement code of ethics is to:

  1. Standardize report-writing formats across agencies
  2. Guarantee officers immunity from civil liability
  3. Guide officer conduct and preserve public trust Correct answer.
  4. Establish minimum physical fitness requirements

Explanation

A code of ethics articulates the values and standards of conduct expected of officers, serving to guide behavior and maintain public confidence in law enforcement. It does not confer legal immunity or set physical or administrative standards.

Question 3Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

An officer stops a driver and is offered a $50 gift card to 'forget the ticket.' Accepting the card would most directly violate which ethical principle?

  1. Use of force proportionality
  2. Integrity and avoidance of conflicts of interest Correct answer.
  3. Duty of confidentiality
  4. Community-oriented policing

Explanation

Accepting a gratuity in exchange for official leniency is a corrupt act that violates the officer's duty of integrity and creates an improper conflict between private gain and public duty. Force, confidentiality, and community policing are unrelated to this situation.

Question 4Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

In the context of law enforcement ethics, 'noble cause corruption' refers to:

  1. Using excessive force in self-defense
  2. Committing misconduct believing the ends justify the means Correct answer.
  3. Accepting gifts from community members during holidays
  4. Failing to complete required training hours

Explanation

Noble cause corruption occurs when an officer rationalizes unethical or illegal conduct as justified by a good outcome, such as planting evidence to convict a person believed guilty. It is dangerous because it subverts due process while appearing well-intentioned.

Question 5Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

Which of the following best describes the ethical duty of an officer who witnesses a fellow officer using excessive force?

  1. Document the incident only if a complaint is filed
  2. Remain silent to preserve department unity
  3. Wait to see whether a supervisor notices
  4. Intervene to stop the force and report the conduct Correct answer.

Explanation

Officers have an ethical and often legal duty to intervene to prevent excessive force and to report misconduct by colleagues. Silence or conditional reporting undermines accountability and public trust.

Question 6Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

The 'law enforcement officer's duty' described in the Law Enforcement Code of Ethics includes serving the community with:

  1. Personal loyalty to superiors above all else
  2. Deference to influential citizens
  3. Dedication and impartial enforcement of the law Correct answer.
  4. Selective enforcement based on officer discretion

Explanation

The Law Enforcement Code of Ethics emphasizes dedication to duty and impartial enforcement of the law without favor or prejudice. Loyalty, deference, or selective enforcement do not override the duty of impartial service.

Question 7Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

A key rationale for community-oriented policing as an ethical approach is that it:

  1. Reduces the need for written reports
  2. Transfers enforcement authority to citizens
  3. Eliminates the need for probable cause
  4. Builds trust and shared responsibility for public safety Correct answer.

Explanation

Community-oriented policing fosters partnership between officers and the community, building trust and shared responsibility for safety. It does not alter legal standards like probable cause or transfer enforcement authority.

Question 8Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

Which of the following is a common indicator of a potential integrity problem within a law enforcement agency?

  1. Mandatory ethics training each year
  2. A pattern of unanswered citizen complaints Correct answer.
  3. Consistent enforcement of department policies
  4. Regular audit of evidence handling

Explanation

A pattern of unanswered or ignored citizen complaints can signal a culture of permissiveness toward misconduct. Consistent policy enforcement, audits, and training are positive controls rather than warning signs.

Question 9Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

An officer is on duty and observes a serious crime in progress outside her jurisdiction. Ethically, the officer should:

  1. Take reasonable action to address the immediate threat and notify the proper authority Correct answer.
  2. Leave the scene to file paperwork first
  3. Ignore the crime because it is outside her jurisdiction
  4. Wait for a bystander to call it in

Explanation

Regardless of jurisdiction, officers have an ethical duty to protect life and address immediate threats, then notify the agency with jurisdiction. Inaction or delay in the face of a serious crime offends the duty to protect the public.

Question 10Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

Under Louisiana law, which of the following best characterizes the role of a peace officer in the criminal justice system?

  1. Judicial decision-maker who determines guilt
  2. Legislative body that creates criminal statutes
  3. Investigator and first responder who enforces laws Correct answer.
  4. Corrections official who supervises sentencing

Explanation

Peace officers serve as investigators and first responders responsible for enforcing laws, gathering evidence, and protecting the public. They do not determine guilt, create statutes, or impose sentences.

Question 11Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

Which of the following scenarios most clearly illustrates a conflict of interest for a peace officer?

  1. Officer writes a report about a traffic stop
  2. Officer investigates a case involving a close family member's business Correct answer.
  3. Officer directs traffic at a community event
  4. Officer arrests a suspect who is a stranger

Explanation

Investigating a matter that affects a close family member's business creates a personal stake that can compromise impartial judgment, which is a conflict of interest. Routine duties involving strangers do not create such a conflict.

Question 12Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

The principle of 'procedural justice' in policing emphasizes that public cooperation is most strongly influenced by:

  1. The size of the department's budget
  2. The number of arrests an officer makes
  3. Perceptions of fairness in how officers treat people Correct answer.
  4. The severity of sentences imposed

Explanation

Procedural justice research shows that people's willingness to cooperate with police depends heavily on whether they perceive the process as fair, respectful, and neutral. Arrest counts, sentence severity, and budgets do not directly drive this perception.

Question 13Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

A department's policy requires officers to report any use of force. An officer uses a takedown but does not report it because no injury occurred. This conduct is best characterized as:

  1. Permissible if the suspect does not complain
  2. A discretionary judgment call left to the officer
  3. Acceptable because no one was hurt
  4. A policy and integrity violation regardless of injury Correct answer.

Explanation

Use-of-force reporting requirements apply whenever force is used, independent of injury or complaint. Failing to report undermines accountability and transparency, making it a policy and integrity violation.

Question 14Introduction to Law Enforcement and Ethics

Which statement best reflects the relationship between ethics and the law for a peace officer?

  1. Ethical standards apply only off duty
  2. Ethics are irrelevant when legal authority exists
  3. Conduct may be legal but still unethical, requiring officers to meet a higher standard Correct answer.
  4. Ethics and law are identical, so legal conduct is always ethical

Explanation

Legal compliance is a floor, not a ceiling; ethical standards often demand more than mere legality, such as fairness and respect. Officers are expected to uphold both legal and ethical standards at all times.

Question 15Criminal Law and Procedure

Under Louisiana law, a warrantless arrest of a person in a public place is lawful when the officer has which of the following?

  1. A hunch based on the person's appearance
  2. Reasonable cause to believe the person committed an offense Correct answer.
  3. A signed statement from any witness
  4. Approval from a supervisor

Explanation

A peace officer may arrest a person without a warrant when the officer has reasonable cause to believe that person has committed an offense. Probable cause, not mere suspicion or witness paperwork, is the constitutional standard.

Question 16Criminal Law and Procedure

A defendant is charged with first degree murder in Louisiana. Which mental state must the state prove?

  1. Criminal negligence
  2. General intent to commit any felony
  3. Reckless disregard for human life
  4. Specific intent to kill or inflict great bodily harm Correct answer.

Explanation

First degree murder requires specific intent to kill or to inflict great bodily harm, along with an aggravating circumstance. Negligence and general intent fall short of the required specific intent.

Question 17Criminal Law and Procedure

An officer stops a vehicle for a burned-out taillight. During the stop the officer observes a clear plastic bag of marijuana on the passenger seat. The officer may lawfully do which of the following?

  1. Seize the bag under the plain view doctrine Correct answer.
  2. Arrest the driver only if the driver confesses
  3. Ignore the bag because the stop was for a traffic offense
  4. Search the entire trunk without any further justification

Explanation

Evidence in plain view from a lawful vantage point may be seized when its incriminating character is immediately apparent. The traffic stop supplies the lawful vantage point.

Question 18Criminal Law and Procedure

Which of the following best describes the felony murder rule in Louisiana?

  1. The rule applies only when the victim is a peace officer
  2. A killing during any misdemeanor is automatically first degree murder
  3. A killing during the commission of certain enumerated felonies can be murder even without intent to kill Correct answer.
  4. A killing is murder only if the defendant personally pulled the trigger

Explanation

Felony murder holds a participant liable for a killing committed during certain enumerated felonies, such as armed robbery or aggravated burglary, without proof of intent to kill. The rule is limited to the felonies listed by statute.

Question 19Criminal Law and Procedure

A suspect is taken into custody and the officer begins questioning. Under Miranda, which warning must be given before custodial interrogation?

  1. That the suspect must answer all questions
  2. That the suspect's statements will be sealed
  3. That the suspect will be released within 24 hours
  4. That the suspect has the right to remain silent and to counsel Correct answer.

Explanation

Miranda requires warnings of the right to remain silent and the right to counsel, and that anything said can be used against the suspect. These warnings must precede custodial interrogation.

Question 20Criminal Law and Procedure

An officer wants to search a home without a warrant. Which circumstance most clearly justifies the entry?

  1. The officer suspects drug activity based on a tip alone
  2. The officer's shift is ending soon
  3. Exigent circumstances such as a person inside needing emergency aid Correct answer.
  4. The homeowner is not currently present

Explanation

Warrantless home entry is permitted when exigent circumstances, such as emergency aid or hot pursuit, make obtaining a warrant impractical. A bare tip or convenience does not create exigency.

Question 21Criminal Law and Procedure

In Louisiana, which of the following is required for a valid consent search?

  1. Consent must be given after arrest
  2. Consent must be witnessed by two officers
  3. Consent must be in writing in every case
  4. Consent must be given voluntarily by a person with authority over the area Correct answer.

Explanation

A consent search is valid when consent is voluntary and given by someone with common authority over the premises or item. Written consent is helpful evidence but is not required in every case.

Question 22Criminal Law and Procedure

A defendant is charged with theft. Which element distinguishes theft from unauthorized use of a movable?

  1. The value of the item taken
  2. The intent to permanently deprive the owner Correct answer.
  3. The time of day the taking occurred
  4. Whether the item was insured

Explanation

Theft requires the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Unauthorized use involves temporary use without that intent.

Question 23Criminal Law and Procedure

Which statement correctly describes the crime of simple burglary in Louisiana?

  1. It requires the use of force against a person
  2. It requires unauthorized entry of a structure with intent to commit a felony or theft Correct answer.
  3. It applies only to dwellings occupied at the time
  4. It requires breaking a window or door

Explanation

Simple burglary requires unauthorized entry of a structure with the intent to commit a felony or theft. Actual force against a person is not an element.

Question 24Criminal Law and Procedure

An officer arrests a suspect for a misdemeanor not committed in the officer's presence. Under Louisiana law, the arrest is generally lawful when which of the following exists?

  1. The suspect is a repeat offender
  2. The officer has reasonable cause and statutory authority for the arrest Correct answer.
  3. The offense occurred within the same parish
  4. The officer obtains a confession first

Explanation

Warrantless misdemeanor arrests outside the officer's presence generally require statutory authority plus reasonable cause. The statute defines which misdemeanors permit such arrests.

Question 25Criminal Law and Procedure

Which of the following is the correct definition of reasonable suspicion for an investigative stop?

  1. A signed affidavit from a victim
  2. A belief based solely on the officer's experience
  3. Specific and articulable facts suggesting criminal activity Correct answer.
  4. A preponderance of the evidence

Explanation

Reasonable suspicion exists when specific and articulable facts, taken with rational inferences, suggest criminal activity. It is a lower standard than probable cause but requires more than a hunch.

Question 26Criminal Law and Procedure

A defendant is charged with aggravated battery. Which fact most directly supports the aggravated element?

  1. The battery was committed with a dangerous weapon Correct answer.
  2. The battery occurred in public
  3. The victim was a stranger
  4. The victim did not seek medical care

Explanation

Aggravated battery requires a battery committed with a dangerous weapon or resulting in serious bodily injury. The use of a dangerous weapon supplies the aggravating element.

Question 27Criminal Law and Procedure

Which statement best describes the exclusionary rule?

  1. It bars all evidence obtained by police
  2. It requires dismissal of every charge
  3. It applies only to confessions
  4. It generally bars evidence obtained through unconstitutional conduct Correct answer.

Explanation

The exclusionary rule generally bars evidence obtained through unconstitutional searches or seizures from being used at trial. It does not bar all police evidence or automatically dismiss charges.

Question 28Criminal Law and Procedure

An officer has probable cause to believe a vehicle contains contraband. Under the automobile exception, the officer may do which of the following?

  1. Search any vehicle anywhere without probable cause
  2. Search only the glove box
  3. Search the vehicle and its containers where the contraband may be found Correct answer.
  4. Arrest every occupant automatically

Explanation

The automobile exception permits a warrantless search of a vehicle and containers within it when probable cause supports the search. The scope is limited to areas where the object of the search may be located.

Question 29Criminal Law and Procedure

Which of the following is an element of the crime of resisting an officer?

  1. The offender must use a weapon
  2. The offender must be under arrest already
  3. The offender must intentionally obstruct, resist, or oppose a lawful arrest or investigation Correct answer.
  4. The officer must be in uniform in all cases

Explanation

Resisting an officer requires intentional obstruction, resistance, or opposition to a lawful arrest or investigation by a known officer. A weapon is not required.

Question 30Criminal Law and Procedure

A defendant claims self-defense. Under Louisiana law, which of the following best states the general rule?

  1. Deadly force is justified whenever the defendant feels threatened
  2. Self-defense applies only inside the home
  3. Self-defense is unavailable if the defendant was in public
  4. Deadly force is justified when the defendant reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm Correct answer.

Explanation

Deadly force in self-defense is justified when the defendant reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent imminent death or great bodily harm. The belief must be reasonable and the threat imminent.

Question 31Criminal Law and Procedure

Which of the following is required before a magistrate may issue a search warrant?

  1. A suspect interview
  2. A verbal statement from the officer
  3. Approval by the mayor
  4. A written affidavit establishing probable cause Correct answer.

Explanation

A search warrant must be supported by a written affidavit establishing probable cause and be approved by a neutral magistrate. The affidavit provides the sworn factual basis for the warrant.

Question 32Criminal Law and Procedure

A suspect invokes the right to remain silent during custodial interrogation. Under Miranda, which statement is correct?

  1. Questioning may continue for one more hour
  2. The suspect must be released immediately
  3. The invocation applies only to written statements
  4. Questioning must cease, and the suspect may later reinitiate contact Correct answer.

Explanation

Once a suspect invokes the right to remain silent, interrogation must cease, though the suspect may later reinitiate communication. Continued questioning after invocation can render statements inadmissible.

Question 33Criminal Law and Procedure

Which of the following describes the crime of possession of stolen property?

  1. Selling any used item
  2. Buying property at a low price
  3. Receiving property known to be stolen with intent to keep it from the owner Correct answer.
  4. Being near stolen property

Explanation

Possession of stolen property requires knowledge that the property is stolen and intent to deprive the owner. Mere proximity or a good deal alone does not establish the offense.

Question 34Criminal Law and Procedure

An officer conducts a traffic stop and orders the driver out of the vehicle. Under controlling law, the order is generally which of the following?

  1. Lawful as a routine safety measure during a lawful stop Correct answer.
  2. Unlawful unless the officer has a warrant
  3. Lawful only if the driver is suspected of a felony
  4. Unlawful without a separate justification

Explanation

During a lawful traffic stop, an officer may order the driver and passengers out of the vehicle as a routine safety measure. No separate justification or warrant is required.

Question 35Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

The Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution primarily protects citizens against which of the following?

  1. Unreasonable searches and seizures by government agents Correct answer.
  2. Deprivation of property without due process of law
  3. Cruel and unusual punishment imposed by the state
  4. Compelled self-incrimination in criminal cases

Explanation

The Fourth Amendment limits government conduct by requiring that searches and seizures be reasonable and generally supported by a warrant based on probable cause. The other protections listed appear in different amendments.

Question 36Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

Which amendment to the U.S. Constitution is the primary source of protection against excessive force by state and local police officers?

  1. The Fourth Amendment Correct answer.
  2. The Eighth Amendment
  3. The First Amendment
  4. The Sixth Amendment

Explanation

Claims that an officer used excessive force during a seizure are analyzed under the Fourth Amendment's objective reasonableness standard. The amendment governs the reasonableness of government seizures of persons.

Question 37Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

Under the exclusionary rule, evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search is generally what?

  1. Admissible only in felony prosecutions
  2. Admissible if the officer acted in good faith
  3. Inadmissible only if the defendant objects before trial
  4. Inadmissible in the prosecution's case-in-chief Correct answer.

Explanation

The exclusionary rule bars the prosecution from using evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment in its case-in-chief. It serves to deter future constitutional violations by law enforcement.

Question 38Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

The Miranda warnings are constitutionally required before custodial interrogation because of protections found in which amendment?

  1. The Sixth Amendment
  2. The Fourth Amendment
  3. The Fourteenth Amendment
  4. The Fifth Amendment Correct answer.

Explanation

Miranda warnings safeguard the Fifth Amendment privilege against compelled self-incrimination during custodial interrogation. They inform suspects of the right to remain silent and to counsel.

Question 39Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

Which of the following best describes the 'public safety' exception to the Miranda requirement?

  1. Officers may skip warnings whenever the suspect is not a U.S. citizen
  2. Officers may ask questions needed to neutralize an immediate threat before giving warnings Correct answer.
  3. Officers may question a suspect about anything once an arrest is made
  4. Officers may delay warnings for up to twenty-four hours after arrest

Explanation

The public safety exception permits unwarned questioning when officers face an immediate threat to themselves or the public, such as locating a hidden weapon. The questions must be reasonably prompted by the exigency.

Question 40Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

An officer stops a driver for a broken taillight. During the stop, the officer develops reasonable suspicion that the driver is carrying a concealed weapon. Under Terry v. Ohio principles, the officer may do which of the following?

  1. Conduct a full search of the vehicle's trunk
  2. Search the driver's home without a warrant
  3. Frisk the driver's outer clothing for weapons Correct answer.
  4. Arrest the driver without any further facts

Explanation

A protective frisk limited to a pat-down of outer clothing for weapons is permitted when an officer reasonably suspects the person is armed and dangerous. The frisk must stay within the scope of the safety concern.

Question 41Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

During a lawful traffic stop, an officer asks the driver to step out of the vehicle. Under settled Fourth Amendment doctrine, this request is generally what?

  1. Unlawful absent probable cause
  2. Unlawful unless a supervisor approves
  3. Permissible as part of the stop Correct answer.
  4. Permissible only with consent

Explanation

Officers may order drivers and passengers out of a lawfully stopped vehicle as a routine safety measure without additional justification. This does not require probable cause or consent.

Question 42Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

A suspect in custody invokes his right to remain silent. Under Miranda doctrine, questioning must do which of the following?

  1. Continue if a different officer asks the questions
  2. Stop, and police must not resume without a valid re-initiation Correct answer.
  3. Continue after a brief pause of ten minutes
  4. Proceed if the suspect is read the warnings a second time

Explanation

Once a suspect unambiguously invokes the right to remain silent, interrogation must cease, and police may not resume questioning unless the suspect re-initiates contact. Simply re-warning the suspect does not override the invocation.

Question 43Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

An officer obtains a confession after telling the suspect that if he does not talk, his family will be arrested. This confession is most vulnerable to challenge on which ground?

  1. It was obtained after formal charging
  2. It was obtained without a search warrant
  3. It was obtained involuntarily through coercion Correct answer.
  4. It violated the suspect's right to a jury trial

Explanation

Threatening harm to a suspect's family can render a confession involuntary under the Due Process Clause, making it inadmissible. Voluntariness requires that the will of the suspect not be overborne.

Question 44Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

Which of the following is required for a warrant to be valid under the Fourth Amendment?

  1. Approval by a prosecuting attorney
  2. Consent from the person whose property is searched
  3. Particular description of the place and items to be seized Correct answer.
  4. A recorded statement from a confidential informant

Explanation

The warrant clause requires probable cause supported by oath or affirmation and a particular description of the place to be searched and persons or things to be seized. Particularity prevents general exploratory searches.

Question 45Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

An officer searches a suspect's backpack incident to a lawful arrest. Under prevailing doctrine, which of the following best states the permissible scope?

  1. The officer may search any container found anywhere in the suspect's vehicle
  2. The officer may search containers within the arrestee's immediate control Correct answer.
  3. The officer may search any container belonging to the suspect regardless of location
  4. The officer may search the suspect's residence without a warrant

Explanation

A search incident to arrest may extend to the arrestee's person and the area within his immediate control, where he might reach a weapon or destroy evidence. The scope is tied to that grabbing area.

Question 46Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

A suspect is arrested at his home. Absent consent or exigent circumstances, a warrantless search of the home incident to that arrest is generally what?

  1. Permitted for the entire residence
  2. Prohibited in all circumstances without exception
  3. Permitted for any room the arrestee has previously occupied
  4. Limited to the area within the arrestee's immediate control Correct answer.

Explanation

Even for a home arrest, a search incident to arrest is confined to the area within the arrestee's immediate control. Broader searches of the home require a warrant or a recognized exception.

Question 47Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

Under the Fourth Amendment, a seizure of a person occurs when, considering all circumstances, which of the following happens?

  1. An officer observes a person in a high-crime area
  2. A reasonable person would not feel free to leave or terminate the encounter Correct answer.
  3. An officer runs a records check on a license plate
  4. An officer merely approaches and asks a question in a public place

Explanation

A seizure occurs when a reasonable person in the suspect's position would not feel free to leave or end the encounter, or when physical force or a show of authority is applied. The totality of circumstances controls.

Question 48Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

The doctrine of 'fruit of the poisonous tree' generally does which of the following?

  1. Excludes evidence only in federal court
  2. Excludes derivative evidence obtained through an unconstitutional search Correct answer.
  3. Excludes only the physical evidence directly seized
  4. Excludes any testimony given by officers

Explanation

The doctrine extends the exclusionary rule to evidence derived from an unconstitutional search or seizure. Derivative evidence is suppressed unless an exception such as independent source or inevitable discovery applies.

Question 49Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

Under the Sixth Amendment, the right to counsel attaches at which point?

  1. At the initiation of formal adversarial proceedings such as arraignment Correct answer.
  2. When a suspect first becomes a person of interest
  3. When the suspect requests a public defender after conviction
  4. When an officer first asks a question during a stop

Explanation

The Sixth Amendment right to counsel attaches once formal adversarial judicial proceedings begin, such as at arraignment or indictment. It is distinct from the Fifth Amendment right discussed in Miranda.

Question 50Constitutional Law and Civil Rights

The Fourth Amendment's protection against unreasonable searches applies to government action. Which of the following conduct by a private security guard employed by a store is generally governed instead by state law and store policy?

  1. A search conducted at the express request of a police detective
  2. A search conducted under a police-department-written policy
  3. A search conducted jointly with officers during a planned raid
  4. A search conducted solely as a private citizen acting without police direction Correct answer.

Explanation

The Fourth Amendment constrains government actors; purely private searches are ordinarily not subject to it. When private persons act as agents of or at the direction of police, constitutional limits can apply.