The Cancelled Conference: Adjudicating a Negated Distractor
You are reviewing a candidate’s performance on a Listening Part 3 multiple-choice item. The item asks: Why was the conference venue changed? A) The original venue was too expensive. B) The original venue was too small. C) The new venue had better accessibility. The candidate chose A and annotated the transcript: 'cheaper? no - actually cheaper; step-free; couldn’t fit.' The relevant transcript runs: 'We’d booked the Corn Exchange, but when registrations hit 1,400 - double our forecast - the fire officer capped us at 900. The Corn Exchange actually came in cheaper than the Riverside, so it wasn’t budget. The Riverside has step-free access, which mattered, but honestly we’d have managed with volunteers at the Corn Exchange. The deciding factor was simply that we couldn’t fit everyone in.' The candidate’s overall Listening score is 27/40, with three of five Part 3 items wrong in the same way.
1. Which option is correct, and which two transcript moves rule out the other two options?
Read the worked answer
The key is B. Two moves rule out the others:
- A is explicitly denied: 'it wasn’t budget' and 'came in cheaper'. The comparative is attached to the Corn Exchange, not the Riverside, so the candidate has reversed the referent.
- C is conceded then downgraded: 'step-free access, which mattered, but honestly we’d have managed'. 'But' plus 'would have managed' marks accessibility as a consideration, not the deciding factor.
- B is asserted twice: the fire officer 'capped us at 900' against 1,400 registrations, and the closing 'couldn’t fit everyone in' restates capacity as the cause.
The answer is not the option with the most mentions; it is the option the speaker commits to after concessions.
2. Name the listening sub-skill the candidate missed and describe a 60-second repair routine.
Read the worked answer
Sub-skill: distinguishing concession from commitment - tracking discourse markers ('but', 'honestly', 'the deciding factor was') rather than content words. A 60-second repair routine:
- Replay only the concessive sentence and ask: what does 'but' cancel?
- Cover options A and C; ask for the one sentence the speaker would keep if paid £10.
- Annotate the transcript with C (concession) and K (key) beside each reason.
- Re-answer without looking at the options, then match.
This trains the candidate to listen for the speaker’s final commitment, not the first familiar word.
3. The candidate says 'but they said "cheaper", so I ticked A.' How would you explain the difference between a word being mentioned and a word being asserted?
Read the worked answer
Explain that mentioning a word is not asserting it. In 'it wasn’t budget', 'budget' is mentioned only to be negated - like a sign saying 'No cash'. The candidate heard the lexical set {cheaper, cost, budget} and matched it to A without tracking polarity.
A quick test: ask 'Does the speaker say the Corn Exchange was too expensive, or that it was cheaper?' If the candidate answers 'cheaper', they have disproved A themselves. Then have them rewrite A as 'The original venue was cheaper than the alternative' to see that it contradicts the transcript. This makes the trap visible and gives them a transferable checking move.