I85PREP
⌘ K
LanguageCert C2 Mastery study materials
LanguageCert C2 Mastery study resources

LanguageCert C2 Mastery practice questions

One question at a time. Build your LanguageCert C2 Mastery understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Listening

In the LanguageCert C2 Mastery Listening test, a candidate hears a speaker say: 'The proposal isn't so much unworkable as premature.' What does the speaker mean?

  1. The proposal is workable but badly written.
  2. The proposal is completely impossible to implement.
  3. The proposal could work, but the timing is wrong. Correct answer.
  4. The proposal has been submitted too late to be considered.

Explanation

The construction 'not so much X as Y' corrects an assumption: the speaker rejects 'unworkable' and substitutes 'premature', meaning the idea is sound but the moment is wrong. Listeners must track the contrastive structure rather than the first adjective heard.

Question 2Listening

A lecturer says on a listening recording: 'Had the funding come through, we would have extended the trial by a further six months.' What is implied?

  1. The funding did not come through. Correct answer.
  2. The funding arrived later than expected.
  3. The trial will be extended next year.
  4. The trial was extended by six months.

Explanation

This is a third conditional with inversion ('Had the funding come through'), which describes an unreal past condition. Because the imagined result did not happen, the funding did not arrive and the extension never took place.

Question 3Listening

In a Listening Part 3 monologue, the speaker says: 'I'd rather you didn't circulate the draft until the figures are signed off.' What is the speaker doing?

  1. Suggesting that the figures be removed from the draft.
  2. Asking someone else not to distribute the draft yet. Correct answer.
  3. Complaining that the draft was circulated too early.
  4. Refusing to sign off the figures personally.

Explanation

'I'd rather you didn't + verb' is a polite directive addressed to another person about their future action. The speaker wants the draft withheld until the figures are approved, which is a request, not a complaint about the past.

Question 4Listening

A candidate hears: 'The minister's statement was economical with the truth.' How should this be understood in a C2 listening context?

  1. The statement was delivered cheaply and quickly.
  2. The statement was concise and well phrased.
  3. The statement was misleading through omission. Correct answer.
  4. The statement was factually accurate but dull.

Explanation

'Economical with the truth' is an established euphemism for deliberate evasion or concealment, not praise for brevity. Recognising fixed idiomatic phrases is part of C2 listening comprehension.

Question 5Listening

On the recording, a manager says: 'Let's touch base once the auditors have gone, shall we?' What is being proposed?

  1. A written report to be sent to the auditors.
  2. A brief meeting after the audit is finished. Correct answer.
  3. A phone call to the auditors' office.
  4. A delay in the audit itself.

Explanation

'Touch base' means to make brief contact or hold a short catch-up, and the tag question 'shall we?' invites agreement. The timing clause places it after the auditors' departure.

Question 6Listening

A speaker in Listening Part 4 says: 'Far from resolving the dispute, the ruling merely shifted it to another forum.' Which paraphrase captures the meaning?

  1. The ruling was ignored by both parties to the dispute.
  2. The ruling settled the dispute and closed the matter.
  3. The ruling created a dispute that had not existed before.
  4. The ruling moved the dispute elsewhere instead of ending it. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Far from X, Y' means Y is the opposite of what X would suggest. Here the ruling did not resolve the dispute; it relocated it. The listener must negate the expectation set up by 'resolving'.

Question 7Listening

During a Listening Part 1 short exchange, one speaker says: 'You might have told me the deadline had moved.' What is the tone and function of this utterance?

  1. An offer to move the deadline for the other person.
  2. A mild reproach for not being informed. Correct answer.
  3. A neutral request for information about the deadline.
  4. An apology for having missed the deadline.

Explanation

'Might have + past participle' used as a standalone comment expresses reproach about something that was not done. The speaker is criticising the other person for failing to pass on information, not asking a question.

Question 8Listening

A podcast guest says: 'It's not that the data are unreliable; it's that nobody has bothered to check them.' Which reading is correct?

  1. The data are unreliable because they were never checked.
  2. The problem lies in neglect, not in the data themselves. Correct answer.
  3. The data have been checked but found unreliable.
  4. Nobody is able to check the data.

Explanation

The 'not that X; it's that Y' frame explicitly denies the first cause and asserts the second. The speaker locates the fault in people's failure to verify, not in the quality of the data.

Question 9Listening

A candidate hears: 'The chair, having consulted the panel at length, put the motion to the vote.' Who put the motion to the vote?

  1. An unnamed member of the panel.
  2. The panel, after consulting the chair.
  3. The vote, after the panel consulted the chair.
  4. The chair, after consulting the panel. Correct answer.

Explanation

The participial clause 'having consulted the panel' modifies the subject of the main clause, which is 'the chair'. English attaches such non-finite clauses to the nearest grammatical subject, so the chair performed both actions.

Question 10Listening

In a Listening Part 2 interview, the guest says: 'I was going to say the scheme was a success, but then I looked at the retention figures.' What does the guest convey?

  1. The scheme was a success despite the retention figures.
  2. The retention figures undermine the claim of success. Correct answer.
  3. The guest has not yet seen the retention figures.
  4. The guest refuses to discuss the scheme.

Explanation

'I was going to say X, but then Y' signals that the speaker abandoned the initial claim because of new evidence. The retention figures therefore cast doubt on the success of the scheme.

Question 11Listening

A speaker on the recording remarks: 'Rarely have I seen a committee so willing to defer to its chair.' What is the speaker's attitude?

  1. Disapproval of the committee's deference. Correct answer.
  2. Admiration for the committee's independence.
  3. Confusion about who chairs the committee.
  4. Indifference to how the committee operates.

Explanation

Fronted negative adverbials like 'rarely have I' create emphasis and often carry an evaluative edge. Combined with 'so willing to defer', the remark criticises the committee for failing to think independently.

Question 12Listening

A lecturer says: 'The findings should be treated with caution, insofar as they rest on a single site.' What is the logical relationship between the two parts?

  1. The caution applies only to the extent that the single-site basis limits the findings. Correct answer.
  2. The findings should be dismissed entirely.
  3. The findings are reliable because they come from a single site.
  4. The single site makes the findings more generalisable.

Explanation

'Insofar as' introduces a limiting condition: the caution is warranted to the degree that the single-site basis is a weakness. It qualifies rather than cancels the recommendation.

Question 13Listening

In a Listening Part 3 discussion, a participant says: 'If anything, the second report is the stronger of the two.' What is the speaker doing?

  1. Conceding that the first report is stronger.
  2. Expressing doubt about both reports.
  3. Correcting an assumption by favouring the second report. Correct answer.
  4. Refusing to compare the two reports.

Explanation

'If anything' introduces a correction or a surprising refinement of what has just been said. The speaker asserts that the second report is stronger, implicitly countering an earlier suggestion to the contrary.

Question 14Listening

A speaker says: 'The board signed off on the merger, albeit with considerable reluctance.' Which statement is accurate?

  1. The board approved the merger enthusiastically.
  2. The board approved the merger unwillingly. Correct answer.
  3. The board refused to approve the merger.
  4. The board postponed a decision on the merger.

Explanation

'Albeit' introduces a concessive qualification: the approval happened, but the manner of it was reluctant. The listener must keep both facts-approval and reluctance-in play at once.

Question 15Listening

A candidate hears: 'No sooner had the results been published than the methodology came under attack.' What happened first?

  1. Both events occurred simultaneously.
  2. The results were published. Correct answer.
  3. The methodology came under attack.
  4. The methodology was revised before publication.

Explanation

'No sooner ... than' places the first event in the main clause with inversion ('had the results been published') and the second event after 'than'. Publication therefore preceded the attack, though only just.

Question 16Listening

A speaker remarks: 'You'd think a company that size would have contingency plans.' What is implied?

  1. The company certainly has contingency plans.
  2. The speaker doubts that the company has contingency plans. Correct answer.
  3. The company has just announced its contingency plans.
  4. The speaker is unsure what size the company is.

Explanation

'You'd think' followed by a conditional perfect expresses an expectation that reality apparently fails to meet. The implication is that the company does not, surprisingly, have such plans.

Question 17Listening

On a Listening Part 4 recording, a speaker says: 'The reforms, such as they were, did little to improve morale.' What does the speaker suggest about the reforms?

  1. They were substantial but poorly implemented.
  2. They were never introduced at all.
  3. They improved morale considerably.
  4. They were minimal and largely ineffective. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Such as they were' is a dismissive qualifier implying that the reforms barely deserved the name. Combined with 'did little to improve', it conveys that they were slight and ineffective.

Question 18Listening

A candidate hears a speaker say: 'I'm not suggesting we cut the budget; I'm suggesting we spend it more wisely.' Which feature marks the speaker's rhetorical strategy?

  1. A denial of one interpretation followed by a restatement. Correct answer.
  2. A direct quotation used as evidence.
  3. A concession followed by a counter-argument.
  4. A hypothetical scenario introduced by a conditional.

Explanation

The 'not X; Y' pattern explicitly blocks a possible misreading before offering the intended meaning. It is a corrective clarification rather than a concession or a hypothetical.

Question 19Listening

In a Listening Part 2 exchange, the interviewer asks: 'Would you say the criticism was justified?' and the guest replies: 'Up to a point.' How should the reply be interpreted?

  1. The criticism was entirely justified.
  2. The guest declines to answer the question.
  3. The criticism was entirely unjustified.
  4. The criticism was partly justified. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Up to a point' is a hedging response meaning partially or to a limited degree. It accepts some validity in the criticism while stopping short of full agreement.

Question 20Listening

A speaker says: 'The committee stopped short of recommending a ban.' What is the effect of 'stopped short of'?

  1. The committee banned the practice immediately.
  2. The committee considered a ban but did not recommend it. Correct answer.
  3. The committee recommended a ban.
  4. The committee refused to discuss a ban.

Explanation

'Stop short of doing X' means to go almost as far as X but not actually do it. The committee approached the idea of a ban without endorsing it, so the recommendation was never made.

Question 21Listening

A lecturer says: 'The evidence, scanty as it is, points in one direction.' Which paraphrase is correct?

  1. The evidence has been deliberately withheld.
  2. Although the evidence is limited, it consistently supports one conclusion. Correct answer.
  3. The evidence is plentiful and points in several directions.
  4. The evidence is so scanty that no conclusion can be drawn.

Explanation

The concessive inversion 'scanty as it is' acknowledges the limitation while the main clause asserts a clear directional trend. Both halves must be retained: limited evidence, single conclusion.

Question 22Listening

A speaker on the recording remarks: 'One could be forgiven for thinking the consultation was a formality.' What does the speaker imply?

  1. The speaker has forgiven those who organised the consultation.
  2. The consultation appeared to be a mere formality. Correct answer.
  3. The consultation was genuinely open and influential.
  4. The consultation was cancelled at short notice.

Explanation

'One could be forgiven for thinking X' presents X as an understandable conclusion given the circumstances, usually with ironic force. The speaker implies that the consultation looked like a formality, whether or not it truly was.

Question 23Listening

A candidate hears: 'Not for nothing did the report single out procurement.' Why does the speaker use this construction?

  1. To question whether the report mentioned procurement at all.
  2. To suggest the report's emphasis on procurement was arbitrary.
  3. To stress that the report had good reason to highlight procurement. Correct answer.
  4. To complain that procurement was omitted from the report.

Explanation

'Not for nothing' means 'not without good reason' and, with inversion, adds emphasis. The speaker is asserting that the report's focus on procurement was well founded.

Question 24Listening

A speaker says: 'For all its faults, the scheme has kept a roof over hundreds of families.' What is the speaker's stance?

  1. The scheme has no faults worth mentioning.
  2. The scheme has failed to help any families.
  3. The scheme should be abolished because of its faults.
  4. The scheme has real benefits despite its shortcomings. Correct answer.

Explanation

'For all its faults' is a concessive phrase meaning 'despite its faults'. The main clause then affirms a concrete benefit, so the stance is balanced but ultimately positive.

Question 25Listening

A speaker remarks: 'Little did the board realise how quickly the market would turn.' What is the communicative effect?

  1. It states that the board anticipated the market shift accurately.
  2. It emphasises the board's failure to anticipate the market shift. Correct answer.
  3. It reports a statement made by the board.
  4. It questions whether the market actually turned.

Explanation

Fronted 'little did' with inversion is an emphatic way of saying the board had no idea. It highlights their lack of foresight regarding the speed of the market reversal.

Question 26Listening

In a Listening Part 1 exchange, a receptionist says: 'I'd have put you through straight away, had the line not been engaged.' What does the speaker mean?

  1. The call could not be transferred because the line was busy. Correct answer.
  2. The speaker refuses to transfer the call in future.
  3. The caller was put through after a short delay.
  4. The speaker forgot to transfer the call.

Explanation

This is a third conditional with inversion: 'had the line not been engaged' replaces 'if the line had not been engaged'. It describes a past situation that did not happen, so the transfer never took place because the line was busy.

Question 27Listening

A guide on a Listening Part 4 recording says: 'The museum is open daily, weather permitting.' What does this tell the listener?

  1. The museum closes whenever the weather is bad.
  2. The museum's opening hours change with the season.
  3. The museum is open every day if conditions allow. Correct answer.
  4. The museum is open only in good weather.

Explanation

'Weather permitting' is a reduced conditional clause meaning 'if the weather permits'. The main statement (open daily) stands, subject to that condition, so it is not an absolute promise.

Question 28Listening

In Listening Part 3, one student says: 'The tutor's feedback was helpful, mind you, but it came far too late.' What is the function of 'mind you'?

  1. It introduces a concession that qualifies the praise. Correct answer.
  2. It marks a change to a completely new topic.
  3. It softens a direct request to the tutor.
  4. It signals that the speaker disagrees entirely.

Explanation

'Mind you' is a conversational marker that adds a qualification or counterpoint to what has just been said. Here it concedes the feedback was helpful while immediately limiting that praise.

Question 29Listening

A speaker in Listening Part 2 says: 'The scheme was, to all intents and purposes, a pilot.' What is the speaker asserting?

  1. The scheme was intended to become permanent.
  2. The scheme was in practice effectively a trial. Correct answer.
  3. The scheme was abandoned before it began.
  4. The scheme was officially labelled a pilot by its funders.

Explanation

'To all intents and purposes' means 'in practical terms, effectively'. The speaker is characterising how the scheme functioned, not what it was formally called.

Question 30Listening

On a Listening Part 4 recording, a speaker says: 'The council has pledged to review the policy in due course.' What is the speaker reporting?

  1. A promise to reconsider the policy at some unspecified future time. Correct answer.
  2. A firm commitment with a published timetable.
  3. A refusal to examine the policy at all.
  4. A decision to scrap the policy immediately.

Explanation

'In due course' means at an appropriate but unspecified later time, and 'pledged to review' signals commitment without a deadline. The phrase therefore conveys vague future action rather than a scheduled one.

Question 31Listening

A candidate hears in Listening Part 1: 'Sorry, I didn't catch that - could you run it by me again?' What is the speaker doing?

  1. Confirming that the information was understood.
  2. Asking for the information to be repeated. Correct answer.
  3. Asking for the information in writing.
  4. Rejecting the information as incorrect.

Explanation

'I didn't catch that' means 'I didn't hear or understand it', and 'run it by me again' is an informal request to repeat or explain something. Together they form a request for repetition.

Question 32Listening

In Listening Part 2, the interviewee says: 'We're looking to expand into Asia within the next two years.' Which paraphrase is accurate?

  1. The company has ruled out expansion into Asia.
  2. The company is reviewing whether Asia exists as a market.
  3. The company intends to expand into Asia soon. Correct answer.
  4. The company has already expanded into Asia.

Explanation

'Looking to' plus an infinitive expresses intention or planning, and 'within the next two years' gives a rough future timeframe. The expansion is therefore planned but not yet achieved.

Question 33Listening

A speaker on a Listening Part 3 recording says: 'Let's park that question for now and come back to it after the break.' What does the speaker want the group to do?

  1. Write the question down for the minutes.
  2. Defer discussion of the question until later. Correct answer.
  3. Ask an outside expert about the question.
  4. Drop the question from the agenda permanently.

Explanation

'Park' a question is an idiom meaning to set it aside temporarily, and 'come back to it after the break' confirms it will be resumed. The group is being asked to postpone, not abandon.

Question 34Listening

A lecturer says: 'The study's conclusions, however tentatively they were framed, have been widely misreported.' What is the lecturer's point?

  1. The conclusions were reported accurately but ignored.
  2. The conclusions were cautious but have still been distorted in coverage. Correct answer.
  3. The conclusions were too vague to be useful.
  4. The study was never published in full.

Explanation

The concessive clause 'however tentatively they were framed' admits the hedging, and 'have been widely misreported' supplies the main criticism. The contrast is between careful wording and inaccurate reporting.

Question 35Listening

In Listening Part 4, a speaker says: 'The minister was at pains to stress that no decision had been taken.' What does this suggest about the minister's message?

  1. The minister wanted it clearly understood that nothing was settled. Correct answer.
  2. The minister was reluctant to speak to the press.
  3. The minister was annoyed at being questioned.
  4. The minister announced a decision that had already been made.

Explanation

'At pains to' means taking deliberate effort to make something clear, and 'no decision had been taken' is the message being stressed. The speaker reports emphasis on the absence of a decision.

Question 36Listening

A speaker in Listening Part 2 says: 'It was less a merger than a takeover dressed up as one.' Which reading is correct?

  1. The two companies merged as equals.
  2. The speaker is unsure whether a merger took place.
  3. The event was in substance a takeover presented as a merger. Correct answer.
  4. The takeover was abandoned in favour of a merger.

Explanation

The 'less X than Y' construction asserts that Y is the better description, and 'dressed up as' means presented misleadingly. The speaker therefore judges the deal to have been a takeover in disguise.

Question 37Listening

On a Listening Part 1 recording, a caller says: 'I was rather hoping you could squeeze me in on Thursday.' What is the caller doing?

  1. Offering to work on Thursday instead.
  2. Making a polite, indirect request for an appointment. Correct answer.
  3. Cancelling an appointment on Thursday.
  4. Complaining that Thursday is fully booked.

Explanation

'I was rather hoping' is a tentative, polite formula for a request, and 'squeeze me in' means find a place in a busy schedule. The caller is asking for an appointment, not commenting on availability.

Question 38Listening

A guest on a Listening Part 4 programme says: 'Far be it from me to tell the board how to do its job.' What is the effect of this remark?

  1. It usually precedes criticism while appearing to disclaim it. Correct answer.
  2. It confirms the speaker's membership of the board.
  3. It is a formal apology for earlier remarks.
  4. It is a sincere refusal to comment on the board.

Explanation

'Far be it from me to...' is a formulaic disclaimer that conventionally introduces the very criticism it pretends to avoid. Listeners should expect a negative comment to follow rather than a genuine abstention.

Question 39Listening

A candidate hears in Listening Part 3: 'We'd have been better off sticking with the original design.' What is being expressed?

  1. A neutral description of the design process.
  2. A regret about a past decision. Correct answer.
  3. A prediction about the current design.
  4. A plan for a future design.

Explanation

'Would have been better off' plus a gerund is a past unreal construction used to express regret or retrospective criticism. The speaker implies the original design was the better choice.

Question 40Listening

In Listening Part 2, the interviewer says: 'You've been described as a reluctant reformer. Fair comment?' What is the interviewer asking?

  1. Whether the guest accepts that description. Correct answer.
  2. Whether the guest has read the article.
  3. Whether the guest knows who said it.
  4. Whether the guest is standing for election.

Explanation

'Fair comment?' is an elliptical invitation to agree or disagree with a characterisation just quoted. The interviewer wants the guest's response to the label, not its source or provenance.

Question 41Listening

A speaker on a Listening Part 4 recording says: 'The figures, give or take a few thousand, are broadly reliable.' How should the figures be understood?

  1. As deliberately falsified.
  2. As approximate but generally trustworthy. Correct answer.
  3. As exact and verified.
  4. As wholly unreliable.

Explanation

'Give or take' signals an approximate margin, and 'broadly reliable' endorses the figures with a caveat. The combined effect is qualified confidence rather than precision or distrust.

Question 42Listening

In Listening Part 1, a colleague says: 'I'll pencil you in for Tuesday, but don't hold me to it.' What does the speaker mean?

  1. The speaker has forgotten the appointment entirely.
  2. The Tuesday arrangement is confirmed and final.
  3. The speaker wants to cancel Tuesday outright.
  4. The Tuesday arrangement is provisional and may change. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Pencil in' means to make a provisional booking, and 'don't hold me to it' withdraws any firm commitment. The arrangement exists but is explicitly not guaranteed.

Question 43Listening

A lecturer says: 'What is striking is not that the policy failed, but that anyone expected it to succeed.' What is the lecturer's rhetorical point?

  1. The policy's failure was predictable and the optimism was misplaced. Correct answer.
  2. The policy was never implemented.
  3. The policy succeeded against expectations.
  4. The policy failed for reasons nobody could have foreseen.

Explanation

The 'not that X, but that Y' frame shifts the emphasis onto Y: the surprise lies in the expectation of success. The lecturer thus treats failure as foreseeable and the optimism as unwarranted.

Question 44Listening

On a Listening Part 3 recording, a student says: 'That may well be so, but it doesn't get us any further.' What is the student conceding?

  1. That the previous point is false and should be dropped.
  2. That the discussion has already reached a conclusion.
  3. That the previous point is probably true but unhelpful. Correct answer.
  4. That the group should change the subject entirely.

Explanation

'That may well be so' concedes probable truth, while 'but it doesn't get us any further' denies usefulness. The student accepts the point while rejecting its relevance to progress.

Question 45Listening

A speaker in Listening Part 4 says: 'Needless to say, the report's recommendations were quietly shelved.' What does 'needless to say' signal here?

  1. That the report was never written.
  2. That the speaker has nothing further to add.
  3. That the recommendations were implemented at once.
  4. That the outcome was entirely expected and unsurprising. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Needless to say' presents the following information as predictable, something the listener could have anticipated. The speaker treats the shelving of recommendations as only too typical.

Question 46Listening

In a Listening Part 2 interview, the guest says: 'Had it not been for my mentor, I'd never have applied.' What does the guest credit the mentor with?

  1. Applying for the same position successfully.
  2. Writing the application on the guest's behalf.
  3. Making the application possible through encouragement. Correct answer.
  4. Rejecting the guest's first application.

Explanation

The inverted third conditional 'Had it not been for...' means 'if it had not been for...', identifying a necessary condition. The mentor's influence was decisive in prompting the application, though not in writing it.

Question 47Listening

A speaker on a Listening Part 4 recording remarks: 'The task force, such as it was, met twice and disbanded.' What does 'such as it was' convey?

  1. That the task force was impressively well resourced.
  2. That the task force was legally constituted.
  3. That the task force is still meeting regularly.
  4. That the task force barely deserved the name. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Such as it was' is a dismissive qualifier implying that the thing named fell far short of what the label suggests. Combined with meeting twice and disbanding, it belittles the task force's substance.

Question 48Listening

A candidate hears: 'It is not so much that the evidence is thin as that it has been consistently overlooked.' Which paraphrase captures the contrast?

  1. Both the evidence and its reception are equally poor.
  2. The evidence is thin and has also been overlooked.
  3. The main problem is the weakness of the evidence.
  4. The main problem is that sound evidence has been ignored. Correct answer.

Explanation

'Not so much X as Y' downgrades X and foregrounds Y as the real point. Here the speaker redirects attention from the alleged thinness of the evidence to its being ignored.

Question 49Listening

On a Listening Part 3 recording, a supervisor says: 'By all means question the methodology - only don't expect the findings to change.' What is the supervisor implying?

  1. Criticism of the method is welcome but will not alter the conclusions. Correct answer.
  2. The methodology is beyond any criticism.
  3. The student should abandon the project.
  4. The findings are certain to be revised.

Explanation

'By all means' grants permission generously, and the 'only' clause restricts what that permission can achieve. The supervisor invites scrutiny while asserting the conclusions are robust.

Question 50Listening

A speaker in Listening Part 4 says: 'Little wonder, then, that the proposal foundered.' What does 'little wonder' indicate about the speaker's view?

  1. The failure was entirely understandable given what preceded it. Correct answer.
  2. The failure was surprising and unexplained.
  3. The speaker is unsure why the proposal failed.
  4. The proposal was never seriously considered.

Explanation

'Little wonder' (or 'small wonder') means 'it is not surprising at all', linking the outcome to earlier evidence. The speaker presents the failure as a predictable consequence.