Three Changes Before the Newspaper Goes to Print
The student newspaper at a university is editing a news brief: 'The dean inferred that budget cuts were coming, and the new lab will considerably ameliorate the student experience. The committee will comprise of seven members, and less students will be affected than last year.' The editor has 20 minutes before the issue goes to print. She can make three changes. She wants to prioritize errors that affect meaning or credibility for an academic audience, not just style preferences. She also has a style guide that says: use plain wording; prefer 'fewer' for countable nouns; avoid 'comprise of.' A reporter argues that 'ameliorate' sounds more professional than 'improve' and should stay.
1. The editor can make three changes. Which three should she make, and what reasoning justifies each?
Read the worked answer
Change 'inferred' to 'implied' (the dean hints; listeners infer, since the words are not interchangeable), change 'comprise of' to 'comprise' or 'be composed of' (comprise takes a direct object), and change 'less students' to 'fewer students' (countable plural). Leave 'ameliorate' for now unless space allows. Reasoning: the first two are outright errors that an academic audience will notice and that change meaning or violate a fixed collocation. 'Less students' is a usage error but less damaging to meaning; it still costs credibility in print. 'Ameliorate' is not wrong, only inflated; the style guide's plain-language rule argues for 'improve,' but that is a preference, not an error. With only three changes, fix errors before preferences.
2. Explain the difference between 'comprise' and 'compose', and between 'infer' and 'imply'.
Read the worked answer
'Comprise' means 'consist of' or 'include'; the whole comprises the parts ('the committee comprises seven members'). 'Compose' means 'make up'; the parts compose the whole ('seven members compose the committee'). 'Comprise of' reverses the relation and is widely treated as an error. 'Imply' is what a speaker or text suggests; 'infer' is what a listener or reader concludes. The dean implies; the reporter infers. Using 'infer' for the dean's action reverses the direction of communication. Both distinctions are judged here because the newspaper's credibility depends on precise wording, not because the words are fancy. The editor's job is to protect the sentence's meaning, and these two fixes do that directly.
3. The reporter defends 'ameliorate' as more professional. How should the editor respond?
Read the worked answer
The editor should separate correctness from tone. 'Ameliorate' is a real word and not grammatically wrong, but it is longer, less familiar, and often used to inflate a simple idea. In a news brief, 'improve' is clearer and no less professional; plain wording is a style-guide requirement, not a lapse in standards. The editor can concede that some formal vocabulary earns its place when it is more precise, but 'ameliorate' is not more precise than 'improve' here. If the reporter wants to sound authoritative, the better route is accurate verbs and specific numbers, not Latinate synonyms. The editor should make this a teachable rule: choose the word that carries the most meaning with the least friction.