Life & Health study materials
Life & Health study resources

Section 1035, LIFO Withdrawals, and a Sale to a Business Partner

Life & Health · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Section 1035, LIFO Withdrawals, and a Sale to a Business Partner

Robert, 55, owns a $100,000 whole life policy with a $60,000 cash value and $45,000 of premiums paid, and separately a nonqualified deferred annuity worth $300,000 with a $180,000 cost basis. Neither contract has a loan against it. His advisor proposes two moves. First, a Section 1035 exchange of the whole life policy into the existing annuity, followed by a $50,000 withdrawal from the annuity to pay off a home equity line. Second, as an alternative, selling the whole life policy to his business partner Sam, who is a member of the same LLC taxed as a partnership, for $70,000 cash.

1. Is the 1035 exchange permitted, and what are the resulting value, basis, and unrealized gain in the annuity? What does Robert give up?

Read the worked answer

Yes, a life insurance contract may be exchanged under IRC Section 1035 for an annuity contract. No gain is recognized on the exchange.

Resulting figures:

  • Value: $300,000 + $60,000 = $360,000
  • Basis: $180,000 + $45,000 = $225,000 (the life policy's $45,000 basis carries over and aggregates with the annuity's existing basis)
  • Unrealized gain: $360,000 − $225,000 = $135,000

The exchange also defers the $15,000 of built-in gain in the whole life policy ($60,000 cash value − $45,000 basis) that would have been ordinary income on a surrender.

What he gives up is significant:

  • A $100,000 income-tax-free death benefit is replaced by an annuity whose death benefit is generally just the accumulated value plus any contractual guarantees.
  • The entire $135,000 of gain will eventually be taxed as ordinary income, and it will be subject to LIFO treatment on any withdrawal.
  • The annuitized/exchanged funds may land under a new surrender charge schedule with the receiving carrier.

Judgment: the exchange is mechanically valid but is a poor fit for someone whose stated need is $50,000 of short-term cash. Robert is converting a tax-free death benefit into a fully taxable accumulation and simultaneously building a larger LIFO tax liability on money he is about to spend.

2. Assuming the exchange is completed first, what is the tax cost of the $50,000 withdrawal, and how would the answer differ if he had withdrawn before the exchange?

Read the worked answer

LIFO applies: withdrawals come out of gain first. After the exchange the contract holds $135,000 of gain, so the full $50,000 is taxable ordinary income.

Plus a 10% penalty of $5,000. Robert is 55, so he is under 59½. None of the exceptions apply:

  • He is not disabled, deceased, or annuitizing.
  • The separation-from-service-at-55 exception applies only to qualified employer plans and IRAs, not to nonqualified annuities.

Total tax impact at a 24% marginal rate: $12,000 income tax + $5,000 penalty = $17,000, on a withdrawal that nets him $33,000 of spendable cash.

If he withdrew before the exchange: the annuity's gain was $120,000, so the $50,000 would still have been fully taxable and the $5,000 penalty would still apply. The difference is that the $15,000 life policy gain would have stayed unrealized rather than being folded into the annuity's LIFO stack, where it now enlarges the taxable portion of every future withdrawal.

Better alternatives if the goal is debt repayment: a policy loan against the whole life contract (generally not a taxable event while the policy stays in force), a withdrawal from a taxable account, or a home equity product at a modest rate. Spending pre-tax annuity dollars while under 59½ is close to the most expensive way to raise $50,000 available to him.

3. If Robert instead sells the policy to Sam for $70,000, what are the income tax consequences to Sam at Robert's death, and to Robert at the sale? Does the LLC matter?

Read the worked answer

The transfer-for-value rule is the issue. When a life policy is sold, the purchaser's death benefit is income-taxable to the extent it exceeds the consideration paid plus any premiums the purchaser later pays, unless a statutory exception applies.

The partnership exception saves it. Transfers to the insured, to a partner of the insured, to a partnership in which the insured is a partner, and to a corporation in which the insured is a shareholder or officer are excepted. Sam is a member of the same LLC taxed as a partnership, so a transfer to Sam as a partner of the insured falls within the exception. The $100,000 death benefit remains income-tax-free to Sam or to the buy-sell arrangement, and Sam's basis is not limited to $70,000.

The exception is narrowly construed. If Sam were merely a co-shareholder in a corporation buying individually, the corporate exception would not reach him, and the transfer would be a taxable transfer for value. Entity form and who is the actual purchaser both matter.

Robert's side of the sale: proceeds of $70,000 less his $45,000 basis produces $25,000 of ordinary income in the year of sale. Policy gain is not capital gain.

Compare the two paths: the sale is taxable to Robert now but preserves a tax-free death benefit and puts $70,000 of cash in his hands today. The 1035 exchange is tax-free now but converts a tax-free death benefit into an ordinary-income annuity and leaves him still needing $50,000. Sam should also have a documented insurable interest as a business partner with a buy-sell need, so the arrangement cannot be characterized as a wager on Robert's life.