A 76-Year-Old Widow, a 10-Year Surrender Schedule, and Day 22
A 76-year-old widow, Helen, has a $280,000 CD maturing. She receives $2,400 a month in Social Security, has $40,000 in savings, and wants $800 a month of additional income. A producer recommends a fixed indexed annuity with a 10-year declining surrender charge (10% in year one, 1% lower each year), a 7% premium bonus, a 6% cap on the index, and an optional guaranteed income rider costing 1.25% a year. He says, 'You can't lose money, and the 7% bonus is free money.' Helen transfers the CD funds. On day 22, her daughter reads the contract and Helen calls the agency to cancel, saying she did not understand that the income rider fee and surrender charge could reduce her account value and that she may need the money for a roof repair next year.
1. Evaluate the suitability of this sale and the accuracy of the producer's statements about the bonus, the cap, and the fees.
Read the worked answer
The sale is questionable on these facts and the statements are misleading.
Suitability factors: Helen is 76, her liquid resources are $280,000 plus $40,000 of savings, and she needs $800 a month, or $9,600 a year. A 10-year surrender schedule locks up most of her liquid capital until age 86. A 10% first-year surrender charge is $28,000, and the schedule declines only one point a year. If she needs a new roof next year, she would pay a large penalty or borrow from the annuity, which may also be limited. The $40,000 savings is a thin cushion for a homeowner of her age.
The statements:
- 'You can't lose money.' Indexed annuities often have a floor that prevents a negative index credit, but fees, rider charges, and surrender charges can reduce the account value. A floor on index credits is not a guarantee against loss on surrender. The statement is incomplete and misleading.
- 'The 7% bonus is free money.' A premium bonus is usually offset somewhere: a lower cap, a longer surrender schedule, a vesting schedule, or a recapture of the bonus on early surrender. Helen must be shown the bonus vesting and the surrender calculation.
- '6% cap.' The cap is not a guaranteed 6% return. It applies only to the index credit, may change, and is applied after the rider fee and other charges. A 0% index year still incurs rider fees.
- Income rider. The 1.25% fee reduces the accumulation value and the income base growth. The guaranteed income may be attractive, but the client must see the trade-off between the rider and a simple immediate annuity.
A suitable recommendation would at least compare a short-surrender MYGA, a CD ladder, a partial immediate annuity for the $800 income, and keeping a liquid reserve. Placing nearly all of her liquid capital into a 10-year product is hard to justify.
2. Helen calls on day 22. What are her rights under California law, and what should the agency do?
Read the worked answer
She is still inside the free-look period.
California generally gives an individual annuity purchaser a 30-day free look, which is longer than the 10-day free look on an individual life policy. Day 22 is within that window. Helen should put the cancellation in writing, sign and date it, keep proof of delivery, and return the contract if the insurer requires it. The insurer must refund the premium or account value without applying the surrender charge. The agency should not delay, argue, or tell her to wait.
The agency should also preserve the file: the illustration, the suitability disclosure, the bonus and vesting schedule, the rider fee disclosure, the signature pages, and the notes of the presentation. If the producer's 'free money' statement is documented, the agency should expect a suitability complaint and should escalate it to the insurer's compliance area. Cancelling within the free look is the cleanest outcome; it avoids the $28,000 first-year surrender charge and restores her liquidity.
3. If Helen had called on day 40 instead, what options would she have, and what should the producer have documented at the point of sale?
Read the worked answer
At day 40 the free look has expired.
Options:
- Keep the contract and use penalty-free withdrawals. Many annuities allow 10% a year without a surrender charge. That might cover the roof repair, but it reduces the income base and may trigger a rider charge.
- Surrender and pay the charge. The year-one charge is about 10% of the account value, roughly $28,000, plus any market-value adjustment if the contract has one. That is a severe outcome for a client who needed liquidity.
- Annuitize or start the income rider. This converts the account into income but gives up access to principal.
- Check for waivers. Some contracts waive charges on nursing-home confinement, terminal illness, or disability. The facts do not show any, but the contract should be checked.
- Complain and seek review. Helen can file a complaint with the insurer and the California Department of Insurance, but a suitability complaint does not automatically undo a contract after the free look.
Documentation that should have existed: Helen's income need and Social Security, liquid assets, homeowner expenses, risk tolerance, time horizon, alternatives considered, the surrender schedule, the bonus vesting and recapture, the rider fee, the cap and participation rate history, and a signed acknowledgment that she may need funds before 10 years. The producer should also have documented why a 10-year product suited a 76-year-old with a near-term roof expense. Without that file, the agency has little defense.