Deciding on a Conference Speaking Slot from a Voicemail
You listen to a voicemail from a conference organiser. The transcript reads: 'Hi, it's Priya from the Southeast Business Expo. We've had a cancellation for the 11:40 slot on 14 May in Hall 2. We'd like you to speak on 'Retail Logistics After Brexit' - 25 minutes plus 10 minutes Q&A. We can't offer a fee, but we can give you a stand in the exhibitor area and two delegate passes. I need confirmation by Friday 5pm because we print the programme on Monday. Also, the AV team needs your slides 48 hours before. If you can't do 11:40, there's a 4:15 slot but it clashes with the keynote, so attendance is usually lower.' You are the operations director of a small logistics firm. That week you have a client audit on 13 May and a board meeting on 15 May. Your marketing budget is £0 for this quarter. You have a colleague who could present but is not a logistics expert.
1. What is the caller's primary purpose and what are the two constraints that shape your decision?
Read the worked answer
Primary purpose: secure a speaker for the cancelled 11:40 slot. Constraints: the Friday 5pm confirmation deadline and the 48-hour slide deadline. Reasoning: Priya gives two slots, but the 11:40 is the one she is selling; the 4:15 is a fallback with a known downside. The confirmation deadline exists because the programme prints on Monday, so a late yes is operationally useless to her. The slide deadline is separate and tighter relative to the event. Your own constraints - client audit on 13 May, board meeting on 15 May - matter because the event is 14 May, so you cannot prepare on the day before or after without cost. The no-fee offer and stand/passes are incentives, not the main purpose. Distinguishing purpose from detail stops you replying only to the fee point.
2. What does the caller imply about the 4:15 slot, and how does that affect your choice?
Read the worked answer
She implies the 4:15 slot is lower value because it clashes with the keynote, so attendance will be thinner. Reasoning: 'attendance is usually lower' is a soft warning, not a refusal; she is managing your expectations and possibly protecting her own programme. For you, a smaller audience may still be worth it if the goal is a stand visit or a specific client meeting, but it is weaker for brand exposure. The implication changes the decision rule: take 11:40 if you can move the audit preparation or delegate it; take 4:15 only if the stand and passes have independent value, or if you can use the trip for client meetings. Do not treat the two slots as interchangeable.
3. What do you do and what do you say in your reply?
Read the worked answer
Accept 11:40 conditionally, confirm by the deadline, and protect the audit. Reply: 'Thanks Priya - yes to 11:40 on 14 May, title as proposed. I'll confirm the speaker name by Friday 5pm and send slides 48 hours before. Please confirm the stand size and the two passes.' Reasoning: the 11:40 slot protects audience size, and the Friday deadline is achievable if you decide today. The audit on 13 May is the risk: either delegate the audit preparation to your colleague by a named date or use the 4:15 fallback only if the audit cannot move. Do not accept both slots. Ask for the stand details in the same reply because they affect whether the trip pays for itself with no fee. Internally, book travel on 13 May evening and set a slide deadline of 10 May, two days before the AV deadline, so a late review does not break the 48-hour rule.