Sri Lanka Audit Officer Exam study materials
Sri Lanka Audit Officer Exam study resources

Sri Lanka Audit Officer Exam: Auditing and Assurance Standards

Sri Lanka Audit Officer Exam · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Auditing and Assurance Standards

This domain tests the Sri Lanka Auditing Standards (SLAuS, adopted from the ISAs by CA Sri Lanka), the ethical code, and - for public sector candidates - the ISSAIs and the National Audit Act No. 19 of 2018 framework that governs the Auditor General.

Core rules

  • Audit risk = inherent risk × control risk × detection risk. Detection risk is the auditor's lever, managed through the nature, timing and extent of procedures.
  • Materiality: set overall materiality (commonly a percentage of profit before tax, total revenue or total expenditure), performance materiality below it, and a clearly trivial threshold; revise if circumstances change.
  • Evidence must be sufficient (quantity) and appropriate (relevance and reliability). External confirmations and inspection outrank inquiry; inquiry alone is never enough.
  • Documentation must be assembled on file within 60 days of the report date; retention normally at least five years.
  • Opinions: unmodified; qualified (except for) where misstatement is material but not pervasive; adverse where material and pervasive; disclaimer where scope limitation is material and pervasive.
  • Going concern (SLAuS 570) and subsequent events (SLAuS 560): adjusting events require adjustment, non-adjusting events require disclosure.
  • Public sector: legality and regularity plus performance (value-for-money) audits, reporting to Parliament through the Auditor General under Article 154.

Worked example

Profit before tax is Rs 24 million. Overall materiality at 5% = Rs 1,200,000; performance materiality at 75% = Rs 900,000. An unrecorded liability of Rs 1,500,000 is found. It exceeds overall materiality, so management is asked to adjust; if it refuses, the financial statements are materially misstated and a qualified opinion follows unless the effect is pervasive.

Traps that cost marks

  • Confusing "except for" (material, not pervasive) with adverse (pervasive).
  • Calling sampling risk a non-sampling error, or vice versa.
  • Reusing last year's materiality benchmark without recalculating.