IESL Part I study materials
IESL Part I study resources

Greenhouse Tomato Salinity and Fertigation Decision

IESL Part I · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Greenhouse Tomato Salinity and Fertigation Decision

A 0.8 ha greenhouse tomato crop is drip-irrigated with water from a borehole. The system has 2 L/h emitters at 30 cm spacing and runs four 45-minute cycles per day. The water analysis shows EC 1.9 dS/m, sodium 210 mg/L, chloride 180 mg/L, bicarbonate 140 mg/L and pH 7.8. The grower uses a two-part fertigation recipe with potassium chloride and ammonium sulphate, targeting EC 2.8 dS/m in the drip. Over six weeks, fruit set has fallen from 82% to 61%, leaf margins show necrosis, and root-zone EC from suction cups has risen to 5.2 dS/m. Drainage fraction is only 8%. The grower wants to increase fertilizer concentration to improve fruit size. Night temperature is 16 C and daytime RH is 78%. The crop is at second truss. The water source cannot be changed, but a 30% reverse-osmosis blend is available.

1. Diagnose the cause of the declining fruit set and leaf necrosis. Compare osmotic stress, specific-ion toxicity, and a micronutrient problem, and state what additional measurements would confirm the diagnosis.

Read the worked answer

Several observations point to salt accumulation rather than a simple fertilizer shortage. The irrigation water already carries EC 1.9 dS/m, about 9.1 mmol/L Na and 5.1 mmol/L Cl. With only 8% drainage, the root zone has concentrated to EC 5.2 dS/m, so the crop is exposed to both a high osmotic potential and elevated Na/Cl. Tomato fruit set is sensitive to osmotic stress; the fall from 82% to 61% fits that pattern. Marginal necrosis on older leaves is more consistent with Na/Cl accumulation than with Ca deficiency, which typically affects young leaves and fruit. Increasing fertilizer would raise EC further and worsen the problem. Confirm with: (i) saturated paste or 1:5 extract from the root zone; (ii) leaf tissue Na and Cl compared with local norms; (iii) drainage EC and volume per emitter; (iv) emitter flow uniformity; and (v) pH and bicarbonate in the drip. A micronutrient check is secondary; no evidence points to Fe or Mn deficiency.

2. Calculate an approximate leaching fraction to move the root-zone EC toward 3.0 dS/m. State assumptions. Then estimate the blended water EC with 30% RO permeate (assume 0.1 dS/m) and explain whether that alone is sufficient.

Read the worked answer

Use a conservative steady-state leaching equation: LF = ECw / (5 ECe - ECw). With ECw = 1.9 and target ECe = 3.0, LF = 1.9 / (15.0 - 1.9) = 1.9/13.1 = 0.145, i.e. about 15% drainage. The 5 factor is an approximation; for drip localized leaching a higher value, 20-25%, is safer. Current drainage is 8%, so salt is accumulating. Blending 30% RO permeate: ECblend = 0.7 x 1.9 + 0.3 x 0.1 = 1.36 dS/m. Recalculating LF = 1.36/(15.0 - 1.36) = 0.10, about 10%. That is lower, but still above the present 8% and does not address the Na/Cl load or the fertilizer salts. Also, RO blend reduces but does not eliminate Na and Cl. It alone is not sufficient; the drainage fraction must be increased and the fertilizer recipe changed.

3. Recommend a revised irrigation and fertigation plan for the next two weeks. Include recipe changes, acidification, and monitoring, and justify each change.

Read the worked answer

First, stop increasing fertilizer. Extend or add one irrigation cycle to achieve 20-25% drainage; measure drainage volume from catch cups under representative emitters. Switch the K source from KCl to potassium nitrate or potassium sulfate, and the N source from ammonium sulfate to calcium nitrate, to cut Cl and avoid ammonium competition with Ca. Keep target drip EC near 2.5-2.8 dS/m initially, not higher, and check that the Ca:Na ratio is adequate. Acidify to pH 5.5-6.0 to convert bicarbonate; at 140 mg/L HCO3, acid injection is needed to prevent precipitates and improve Ca availability. Use the 30% RO blend if it can be supplied continuously; do not alternate abruptly. Monitor daily: irrigation and drainage EC/pH, drainage fraction, and emitter uniformity. Weekly: leaf tissue Na/Cl and root-zone extract. If Na remains high, consider gypsum only with a soil-structure test, because gypsum adds salinity. Reassess fruit set after two weeks.