Settlement Fail, CCP Interposition and a Cash Buffer Breach
On Monday 3 June, a Dublin-based UCITS fund sells 4,000,000 shares of a FTSE 250 company at £2.10, gross £8.4 million, through its executing broker. Trade date is 3 June, settlement date 5 June (T+2). The fund's global custodian is the receiving agent. On 5 June the buyer's custodian fails to deliver cash; the fund does not receive the £8.4 million. The same day, the fund has a €7.9 million purchase settling in a different market, and its euro account is overdrawn by €1.2 million. The fund's custody agreement permits the custodian to borrow overnight at SONIA + 150 bp. The fail continues for six business days. Assume the applicable CSDR cash penalty is 1.0 basis point per day of the settlement amount, payable by the failing party. The fund's clearing member is not the buyer's clearing member; the trade was executed on a regulated market with a central counterparty. The fund's NAV is €500 million and its investment policy says it must maintain a 2% cash buffer.
1. Calculate the cash penalty and the funding cost caused by the fail, and assess the cash-buffer breach.
Read the worked answer
Penalty = £8.4m × 1.0 bp × 6 days = £8.4m × 0.0001 × 6 = £5,040. The failing party is the buyer's clearing member, which pays the CCP; the fund's clearing member may receive a corresponding amount, but the fund's contractual claim is against its own clearing member/custodian, not the ultimate buyer. The penalty is compensation, not a guarantee of funding cost.
The euro account is already overdrawn by €1.2m. To settle the €7.9m purchase, the fund needs €9.1m of funding (or must use available cash elsewhere). At SONIA 5.25% + 150 bp = 6.75%, six days' overdraft on €9.1m costs €9.1m × 0.0675 × 6/365 = €10,101. The £5,040 penalty is roughly €5,897 at GBP/EUR 1.17, so it covers only about 58% of the funding cost. The 2% cash buffer on €500m NAV is €10m; a negative €1.2m balance and a €7.9m payment already breach the buffer before the fail is resolved.
2. Explain the role of the CCP and the fund's clearing member in the fail, and why the fund is exposed to its own clearing member rather than the ultimate buyer.
Read the worked answer
On a regulated market with a CCP, novation occurs at the CCP: the CCP becomes buyer to the selling clearing member and seller to the buying clearing member. The fund's clearing member is the fund's counterparty for settlement; the buyer's failure is between the buyer's clearing member and the CCP. The fund therefore does not normally have direct recourse to the buyer. The CCP manages the fail through margin, buy-in procedures and, if the member defaults, the default waterfall: the defaulter's margin, the default fund, CCP capital and possibly assessments. The fund should ensure its clearing member passes through any buy-in or penalty entitlements and keeps the fund informed.
3. The PM wants to instruct the custodian to borrow the missing cash overnight and to press the broker for a buy-in. Advise on the correct sequence and controls, including the 2% cash buffer.
Read the worked answer
Sequence: (1) fund the €7.9m purchase immediately, because a second fail would create another penalty and reputational risk; (2) do not assume the £8.4m sale proceeds are available; (3) instruct the custodian to borrow overnight within the permitted facility and notify compliance/treasury; (4) instruct the clearing member to claim the CSDR penalty and to initiate buy-in after the applicable extension period for the liquid share; (5) document the breach of the 2% buffer and obtain a temporary waiver or top-up from the fund's cash manager. Controls: daily settlement ageing, a pre-settlement cash ladder, limits on using unsettled sale proceeds for purchases, and escalation at T+1 when a fail is forecast.