Default Judgment After Defective Substituted Service
On 12 January, Kumba files a complaint in the Sixth Judicial Circuit Court, Montserrado County, against Tarr for breach of a construction contract, demanding L$1,200,000. The clerk issues a summons. The sheriff's return states: 'Served the within summons on defendant's brother, Sam Tarr, at defendant's residence in Kakata, Margibi County, on 20 January; defendant not found.' Tarr actually lives in Buchanan, Grand Bassa County, and Sam is not his brother but a caretaker. Tarr learns of the case on 15 March when a bank garnishee freezes his account. Default judgment had been entered on 10 February. On 25 March Tarr moves to set aside the default and to quash service, arguing he was never served. Kumba argues Tarr waited too long and that the sheriff's return is conclusive.
1. Was service sufficient under the Civil Procedure Law? Discuss personal service, substituted service, and the effect of the sheriff's return.
Read the worked answer
Issue: Whether service on Sam at the Kakata address was valid.
Analysis: Due process requires notice reasonably calculated to apprise the defendant of the action. Personal service on the defendant is preferred. Substituted service at the defendant's dwelling is generally allowed only on an adult resident of suitable discretion who actually lives there, and often only when personal service cannot be made with due diligence; some rules also require mailing. Here the return says defendant 'not found' and service was on 'defendant's brother,' but the facts show Sam is a caretaker and Tarr lives in Buchanan, Grand Bassa County. Sam is not an adult resident of Tarr's dwelling. The sheriff's return is prima facie evidence of service, not conclusive; it can be impeached by testimony. The return itself shows a fatal defect because it does not establish residence or authority. There is no showing of court-ordered service by publication or alternative means.
Conclusion: Service was insufficient; the court lacked personal jurisdiction over Tarr.
2. What standard governs a motion to set aside a default judgment, and does Tarr's delay bar relief?
Read the worked answer
Issue: Standard for setting aside default and effect of Tarr's delay.
Analysis: A default judgment may be set aside for mistake, inadvertence, surprise, excusable neglect, or because the judgment is void. Courts prefer deciding cases on the merits. Tarr moved about 43 days after the default and 10 days after learning of the garnishment. Even if a rule sets a shorter time, a judgment entered without valid service is void for lack of jurisdiction and may be attacked at any time. The delay is explained by the lack of notice; it is not a waiver. Kumba's argument that the sheriff's return is conclusive fails because a return can be contradicted on jurisdictional facts.
Conclusion: Tarr is entitled to relief from the default; the delay does not bar a voidness challenge.
3. What should the Circuit Court do, and what conditions, if any, should it impose?
Read the worked answer
Issue: What orders should the court make.
Analysis: The court should quash the purported service, vacate the default judgment and the garnishment, and order Kumba to serve Tarr properly in Grand Bassa County or by court-approved alternative means. Tarr should file an answer within a short fixed time, such as 10 days after proper service or after the order. The court may impose reasonable terms-costs caused by the defective service-but should not require a bond as a condition of relief unless the Civil Procedure Law so provides. The merits of the construction contract should proceed to trial. If Kumba's garnishment caused frozen funds, the court should release them promptly.
Conclusion: Vacate, quash, permit answer, and order proper service; no default on the merits.