Dollar-for-Dollar Disregard and Spousal Impoverishment
Harold, age 82, entered a nursing home in 2024. His wife, Edith, age 78, remains at home. Harold has a partnership-qualified long-term care policy that has paid $120,000 in benefits. The couple has $360,000 in countable certificates of deposit and savings. Their home is worth $250,000, and Edith lives there. Harold receives $2,400 per month in Social Security, and Edith receives $1,800 per month. The nursing home costs $9,000 per month. The state uses the 2025 maximum community spouse resource allowance of $157,920 and provides dollar-for-dollar partnership asset disregard. Harold is applying for Medicaid. His daughter also received a $50,000 transfer from Harold 26 months before the application.
1. How much of the $360,000 is disregarded because of the partnership policy, and what is the countable amount after the disregard?
Read the worked answer
In a dollar-for-dollar partnership state, the disregard equals the benefits paid by the partnership policy, so $120,000 is disregarded. Subtracting that from $360,000 leaves $240,000 of countable resources for Medicaid purposes, assuming the state applies the disregard to the couple's total countable resources before the spousal allowance. The home is not counted while Edith lives in it, although estate recovery may later be an issue. The policy benefits themselves are generally not counted as Harold's income when paid directly to the care provider. The key point is that the partnership policy does not make the entire $360,000 exempt; it reduces countable assets by the amount actually paid, and the remaining $240,000 must be analyzed under spousal impoverishment rules.
2. Assuming the state applies the disregard before the spousal resource allowance, how much can Edith keep, and how much must be spent down?
Read the worked answer
After the $120,000 disregard, $240,000 remains countable. Edith may keep the community spouse resource allowance, which the problem states is $157,920. That leaves $82,080 above the allowance. The couple must spend that excess on Harold's care or otherwise convert it into noncountable assets before Harold can qualify, subject to state rules and any allowable deductions. Edith's income of $1,800 per month is hers, and she may also be entitled to a monthly maintenance needs allowance if her income is below the state standard, but that does not eliminate the resource excess. Harold's $2,400 Social Security generally goes to the nursing home cost. The home remains excluded while Edith lives there, but the couple should not assume the home is protected from estate recovery after her death.
3. Harold transferred $50,000 to his daughter 26 months before application. How does the five-year look-back affect the analysis, and can the partnership disregard offset the penalty?
Read the worked answer
The $50,000 transfer occurred within the 60-month Medicaid look-back period, so it is a potentially uncompensated transfer. The state will calculate a penalty period by dividing $50,000 by its penalty divisor, which is based on the average daily private-pay nursing-home rate. If the divisor were $300 per day, the penalty would be about 167 days, but the exact figure depends on the state rate. The penalty generally begins when Harold is otherwise eligible for Medicaid and would not be offset by the partnership asset disregard, because the disregard affects countable resources, not transfer penalties. The daughter may be asked to return the funds, or the state may impose the penalty period. Harold should consult an elder-law attorney before applying to avoid an unexpected period of ineligibility.