I85PREP
⌘ K
MA Bar study materials
MA Bar study resources

MA Bar practice questions

One question at a time. Build your MA Bar understanding.

First 50 of 200 questions. Each one lists the choices, the correct answer, and an explanation. The checker at the top of this page saves progress in this browser when it is available.

Continue in the practice tool above to load more questions, 50 at a time.

Question 1Civil Procedure

A plaintiff files suit in the Massachusetts Superior Court. Which document must the plaintiff serve on the defendant along with the summons to commence the action properly?

  1. A copy of the complaint and the tracking order
  2. The complaint and a statement of damages only
  3. A notice of appearance and a request for a jury trial
  4. The complaint, or a motion accompanied by an affidavit, and any discovery requests Correct answer.

Explanation

Under the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff must serve the defendant with a copy of the complaint (or a motion with affidavit if filing is pending) together with the summons. Discovery papers may also be served at that time. Proper service of process is what confers personal jurisdiction over the defendant.

Question 2Civil Procedure

In Massachusetts civil practice, within how many days after filing a complaint must the plaintiff serve the defendant with process, absent a court order extending the time?

  1. 30 days
  2. 180 days
  3. 90 days Correct answer.
  4. 120 days

Explanation

Massachusetts Rule of Civil Procedure 4(j) requires service of the summons and complaint within 90 days after the filing of the complaint. If service is not made within that period, the action is subject to dismissal without prejudice absent good cause shown. The court may extend the time for service on a showing of good cause.

Question 3Civil Procedure

A defendant in a Massachusetts Superior Court action believes the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Which motion is the proper vehicle to raise this defense?

  1. Motion for summary judgment under Rule 56
  2. Motion to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) Correct answer.
  3. Motion to strike under Rule 12(f)
  4. Motion for a more definite statement

Explanation

Rule 12(b)(6) permits a party to move to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. A motion for a more definite statement addresses vague pleadings, and summary judgment tests the evidence after discovery. The 12(b)(6) motion tests the legal sufficiency of the complaint on its face.

Question 4Civil Procedure

Under the Massachusetts Rules of Civil Procedure, a defendant must file an answer within how many days after being served with the summons and complaint?

  1. 10 days
  2. 45 days
  3. 20 days Correct answer.
  4. 30 days

Explanation

Massachusetts Rule 12(a) requires the defendant to serve an answer within 20 days after being served with the summons and complaint. The answer must respond to each allegation and raise affirmative defenses. Failure to answer timely can result in a default.

Question 5Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts plaintiff wishes to amend her complaint to add a new claim after the defendant has already filed a responsive pleading. What is the general rule governing amendment?

  1. Amendment is barred once an answer has been filed
  2. Leave to amend is freely given when justice so requires Correct answer.
  3. Amendment requires a new filing fee and a new summons
  4. Amendment is permitted only with the defendant's written consent

Explanation

Rule 15(a) directs that leave to amend be freely given when justice so requires, and a party may amend once as a matter of course within a set period. Courts liberally permit amendments absent undue delay, bad faith, or prejudice. A new filing fee or summons is not required to amend an existing pleading.

Question 6Civil Procedure

In a Massachusetts civil action, which discovery device compels a party to answer written questions under oath without the need for a deposition?

  1. Interrogatories Correct answer.
  2. Request for admission
  3. Request for production of documents
  4. Subpoena duces tecum

Explanation

Interrogatories are written questions that a party must answer under oath in writing within the time allowed by the rules. Requests for admission seek concessions of fact, and requests for production seek documents. A subpoena duces tecum compels a nonparty to produce documents.

Question 7Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts plaintiff serves interrogatories on the defendant. Within how many days after service must the defendant generally respond, unless the parties stipulate or the court orders otherwise?

  1. 45 days
  2. 15 days
  3. 30 days Correct answer.
  4. 60 days

Explanation

Under the Massachusetts discovery rules, a party served with interrogatories must serve a written response within 30 days after service. The response may include answers and objections. Failure to respond timely may lead to a motion to compel and sanctions.

Question 8Civil Procedure

During discovery, the defendant in a Massachusetts case refuses to produce documents that the plaintiff believes are relevant and not privileged. What is the plaintiff's proper first step to obtain the documents?

  1. Serve a second set of interrogatories
  2. File a motion for summary judgment
  3. Move to compel discovery under Rule 37 Correct answer.
  4. File a motion for sanctions immediately

Explanation

When a party fails to respond to a discovery request, the requesting party may move for an order compelling discovery under Rule 37. Sanctions generally follow only after a violation of a discovery order. The motion to compel is the appropriate initial remedy to enforce a discovery obligation.

Question 9Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts litigant wants to depose a witness who is not a party to the action and who will not appear voluntarily. What is the proper mechanism to compel the witness's attendance?

  1. Serve a request for admission
  2. Issue a subpoena under Rule 45 Correct answer.
  3. Serve interrogatories
  4. File a motion to dismiss

Explanation

Rule 45 authorizes a subpoena commanding a nonparty to attend a deposition and give testimony. A nonparty who refuses to appear voluntarily must be subpoenaed. Interrogatories and requests for admission are directed to parties, not to compel a nonparty's appearance.

Question 10Civil Procedure

A plaintiff in a Massachusetts Superior Court case moves for summary judgment. Which showing must the moving party make to prevail?

  1. That the evidence is more likely true than not
  2. That there is no genuine issue of material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law Correct answer.
  3. That the opposing party failed to answer the complaint
  4. That the complaint states a plausible claim

Explanation

Rule 56 permits summary judgment only where there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law. The movant must support the motion with pleadings, affidavits, and discovery materials. Credibility and disputed facts are reserved for trial.

Question 11Civil Procedure

In a Massachusetts civil action, a defendant who fails to respond to a complaint and is defaulted wishes to have the default removed. What must the defendant typically show to set aside the default?

  1. That the case has been pending for more than a year
  2. Good cause, such as mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect Correct answer.
  3. That the defendant cannot afford counsel
  4. That the plaintiff's claim is frivolous

Explanation

Rule 55(c) allows the court to set aside a default for good cause shown, and Rule 60(b) permits relief for reasons such as mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. The defendant must also present a meritorious defense in many circumstances. The focus is on the reason for the default and the strength of the defense.

Question 12Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts plaintiff wishes to voluntarily dismiss her case without prejudice before the defendant has served an answer or a motion for summary judgment. What is the general rule?

  1. She may not dismiss once the complaint is filed
  2. She must file a motion and obtain court approval
  3. She must obtain the defendant's consent in all cases
  4. She may dismiss without leave of court by filing a notice of dismissal Correct answer.

Explanation

Rule 41(a) permits a plaintiff to dismiss an action without a court order by filing a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves an answer or a motion for summary judgment. After that point, dismissal generally requires consent or court approval. The dismissal is typically without prejudice unless it is a second dismissal.

Question 13Civil Procedure

In a Massachusetts jury trial, a party wishes to challenge a prospective juror for cause on the ground that the juror is biased. Who decides whether the challenge is sustained?

  1. The judge Correct answer.
  2. The jury foreperson
  3. The opposing counsel by agreement
  4. The clerk of court

Explanation

The trial judge determines whether a challenge for cause should be sustained based on the juror's demonstrated bias or inability to be fair. Peremptory challenges are limited in number, but challenges for cause are not. The judge's ruling is reviewed for abuse of discretion.

Question 14Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts litigant seeks to introduce a document at trial but the opposing party objects on hearsay grounds. Which of the following is the most accurate statement of the general rule?

  1. Hearsay is admissible if the declarant is unavailable
  2. Hearsay is always admissible in civil cases
  3. Hearsay is generally inadmissible unless it falls within an exception or exclusion Correct answer.
  4. Hearsay is admissible only if it is written

Explanation

The general rule is that hearsay, an out-of-court statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted, is inadmissible unless an exception or exclusion applies. Unavailability of the declarant is relevant to some exceptions but is not itself a blanket basis for admissibility. The rule applies in civil and criminal cases alike.

Question 15Civil Procedure

In a Massachusetts civil trial, the plaintiff bears the burden of proving her case. What is the standard of proof she must satisfy?

  1. By a preponderance of the evidence Correct answer.
  2. By substantial evidence
  3. Beyond a reasonable doubt
  4. By clear and convincing evidence

Explanation

In ordinary civil actions the plaintiff must prove the elements of the claim by a preponderance of the evidence, meaning it is more likely true than not. Clear and convincing evidence is reserved for certain heightened matters such as fraud. Beyond a reasonable doubt applies in criminal cases.

Question 16Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts plaintiff has obtained a final judgment against a defendant who owns real property in another county. The defendant refuses to pay. What is the plaintiff's most direct method to enforce the judgment against the real property?

  1. Record an execution and levy on the property Correct answer.
  2. Serve interrogatories on the defendant
  3. File a motion to reopen the judgment
  4. File a new lawsuit on the judgment in the same court

Explanation

After judgment, a plaintiff may obtain a writ of execution and have it levied against the defendant's real property to satisfy the judgment. Recording and levying on the property is the enforcement mechanism. Merely filing a new action or serving discovery does not directly reach the property.

Question 17Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts defendant believes the trial court erred in excluding key evidence and wishes to preserve the issue for appeal. What must the defendant generally do at trial to preserve the claim of error?

  1. Send a letter to the judge after the verdict
  2. File a post-trial motion for a new trial only
  3. Make a timely objection on the record and, where appropriate, an offer of proof Correct answer.
  4. Wait until after judgment and raise it for the first time on appeal

Explanation

To preserve an evidentiary issue for appellate review, a party must make a timely objection and, where the ruling excludes evidence, make an offer of proof so the record shows what the evidence would have been. Issues not raised and preserved at trial are generally waived on appeal. A post-trial motion alone does not substitute for a contemporaneous objection.

Question 18Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts plaintiff sues a defendant in Superior Court, and the defendant asserts a counterclaim arising from the same transaction. The plaintiff believes the counterclaim is legally insufficient. What is the plaintiff's proper response?

  1. File a new action in a different court
  2. Ignore the counterclaim and proceed to trial
  3. Move for a default judgment
  4. Move to dismiss the counterclaim under Rule 12(b)(6) or file a reply as required Correct answer.

Explanation

A party may challenge the legal sufficiency of a counterclaim by motion under Rule 12(b)(6). If no motion is made, the rules may require a reply to a counterclaim in certain circumstances. Ignoring the counterclaim risks default or waiver, and a separate action is not the proper response.

Question 19Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts attorney learns during litigation that a document produced by the client contains information protected by the attorney-client privilege, and the client does not wish to waive the privilege. What is the attorney's most appropriate course of action?

  1. Produce the document without comment to avoid delay
  2. Disclose the document but redact the attorney's name
  3. Assert the privilege, withhold or seek to claw back the document, and notify opposing counsel Correct answer.
  4. Destroy the document to prevent disclosure

Explanation

An attorney must protect a client's privileged information by asserting the privilege and, if a privileged document was inadvertently produced, promptly notifying opposing counsel and seeking its return or a clawback. Destroying evidence or producing privileged material without objection can waive the privilege or invite sanctions. The duty of confidentiality and the rules of professional conduct guide this response.

Question 20Civil Procedure

A Massachusetts litigant wants to use a request for admission to establish a fact at trial. If the opposing party fails to respond to the request within the time allowed, what is the general effect?

  1. The requesting party must file a motion to compel
  2. The request is automatically withdrawn
  3. The court must hold a hearing before any admission
  4. The request is deemed admitted Correct answer.

Explanation

Under the Massachusetts rules, a matter is admitted if the party to whom a request for admission is directed fails to serve a timely written answer or objection. The admission is binding for purposes of the pending action. A party may seek to withdraw or amend an admission only with leave of court in limited circumstances.

Question 21Constitutional Law

Under the federal system established by the U.S. Constitution, which of the following best describes the source of a state's general police power?

  1. It derives from the Full Faith and Credit Clause, which authorizes states to enforce each other's laws.
  2. It is reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment, since the federal government possesses only enumerated powers. Correct answer.
  3. It is delegated to the states by Congress through the Commerce Clause.
  4. It flows from the Supremacy Clause, which grants states authority over local matters.

Explanation

The federal government is one of enumerated powers, and the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states (or the people) powers not delegated to the United States. The general police power-promoting health, safety, morals, and welfare-is therefore a state attribute, not a federal one.

Question 22Constitutional Law

A federal statute regulates a purely local, non-economic activity that, when aggregated with similar activity nationwide, would substantially affect interstate commerce. Under current Supreme Court doctrine, this statute is most likely:

  1. Invalid, because only states may regulate activity that occurs entirely within their borders.
  2. Valid, because the aggregation principle always sustains Commerce Clause regulation.
  3. Valid, because the Necessary and Proper Clause independently authorizes any regulation of local conduct.
  4. Invalid, because Congress may not regulate non-economic intrastate activity based on aggregation alone. Correct answer.

Explanation

Under Lopez and Morrison, Congress cannot regulate non-economic intrastate activity solely by aggregating its national effects on commerce. The aggregation principle applies to economic activities that are part of a broader regulatory scheme.

Question 23Constitutional Law

Which clause of the Fourteenth Amendment has been interpreted to apply most of the Bill of Rights against the states?

  1. The Due Process Clause Correct answer.
  2. The Privileges or Immunities Clause
  3. The Citizenship Clause
  4. The Equal Protection Clause

Explanation

The Supreme Court has used the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to incorporate most provisions of the Bill of Rights against the states. The Privileges or Immunities Clause was largely narrowed by the Slaughter-House Cases.

Question 24Constitutional Law

A state law requires all voters to present a government-issued photo ID. The state offers free IDs but requires documents and travel that impose a modest burden on some voters. A challenger argues the law burdens the right to vote. Which standard of review applies?

  1. Intermediate scrutiny, because the law involves a suspect classification.
  2. Strict scrutiny, because the right to vote is fundamental and any burden triggers it.
  3. A balancing approach that weighs the burden on voters against the state's precise interests in election integrity. Correct answer.
  4. Rational basis review, because election regulations are presumed constitutional in all cases.

Explanation

Under the Anderson-Burdick framework, courts weigh the character and magnitude of the injury to voting rights against the precise interests the state offers to justify the burden. Severe burdens trigger strict scrutiny, while reasonable, nondiscriminatory regulations generally survive.

Question 25Constitutional Law

The Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as applied to the states, primarily prohibits government from:

  1. Permitting voluntary student prayer that is not school-sponsored.
  2. Making a law respecting an establishment of religion. Correct answer.
  3. Displaying religious texts in a private museum.
  4. Allowing religious groups to use public facilities on the same terms as secular groups.

Explanation

The text of the Establishment Clause bars Congress from making any law respecting an establishment of religion, and it is incorporated against the states. It prevents government action that endorses, coerces, or excessively entangles with religion.

Question 26Constitutional Law

A city ordinance prohibits all signs on residential property except those identifying the occupant and those warning of hazards. A resident wishes to post a political sign. Which First Amendment analysis most accurately applies?

  1. The ordinance is content-neutral because it applies to all signs equally.
  2. The ordinance is a content-based restriction on speech that must satisfy strict scrutiny. Correct answer.
  3. The ordinance is valid as a reasonable time, place, and manner restriction.
  4. The ordinance is an unconstitutional prior restraint because it requires no permit.

Explanation

An ordinance that permits some categories of signs while prohibiting others based on their content is content-based and subject to strict scrutiny. Reed v. Town of Gilbert held that such sign regulations cannot be justified merely as ordinary time, place, and manner rules.

Question 27Constitutional Law

Under the Free Exercise Clause as interpreted in Employment Division v. Smith, a neutral law of general applicability that burdens religious practice:

  1. Is invalid unless the state provides a religious exemption.
  2. Is valid only if the state demonstrates a compelling interest.
  3. Is generally valid even if it has the incidental effect of burdening religious exercise. Correct answer.
  4. Must satisfy strict scrutiny whenever it burdens any religious practice.

Explanation

Smith held that neutral, generally applicable laws are not subject to strict scrutiny merely because they incidentally burden religious practice. Strict scrutiny applies when a law targets religious conduct or involves individualized exemptions.

Question 28Constitutional Law

A federal statute requires states to amend their driver's licensing systems to comply with new national standards or lose all federal highway funding. Under Dole, this condition is most likely:

  1. Valid, because the condition is related to the federal interest in highway safety and does not cross the point of coercion. Correct answer.
  2. Unconstitutional, because Congress may not condition federal spending on state action.
  3. Unconstitutional, because the condition is unrelated to the purpose of the federal highway funds.
  4. Valid, because Congress may impose any condition it wishes on federal funds.

Explanation

Spending Clause conditions are valid if they serve the general welfare, are unambiguous, are related to the federal interest in the program, and do not coerce states. A condition tied to highway safety is germane to highway funding and not coercive here.

Question 29Constitutional Law

The dormant Commerce Clause doctrine restricts state regulation that:

  1. Subsidizes in-state businesses through general tax measures.
  2. Directly regulates interstate commerce without a federal statute.
  3. Taxes residents at a higher rate than nonresidents in all circumstances.
  4. Discriminates against or unduly burdens interstate commerce, absent congressional authorization. Correct answer.

Explanation

The dormant Commerce Clause limits state laws that discriminate against interstate commerce or impose undue burdens on it, even when Congress has not acted. Congress may permit otherwise impermissible state regulation.

Question 30Constitutional Law

A state imposes a tax on all out-of-state corporations doing business in the state but exempts in-state corporations from the tax. This tax is most likely:

  1. Invalid, because it discriminates against interstate commerce and is virtually per se invalid. Correct answer.
  2. Valid, because states may tax foreign corporations as a condition of doing business.
  3. Valid, because the tax is evenly apportioned among all corporations.
  4. Invalid, because states may not impose any tax on interstate commerce.

Explanation

A tax that exempts in-state entities while taxing out-of-state competitors discriminates against interstate commerce and is virtually per se invalid under the dormant Commerce Clause. The state would need to show no other means to advance a legitimate local purpose.

Question 31Constitutional Law

Which of the following is required for a federal court to have Article III standing?

  1. The plaintiff must assert a generalized grievance shared by all citizens.
  2. The plaintiff must have suffered an injury in fact that is fairly traceable to the defendant and redressable by the court. Correct answer.
  3. The plaintiff must show that the defendant acted with discriminatory intent.
  4. The plaintiff must have exhausted all state administrative remedies.

Explanation

Standing requires an injury in fact, causation (fairly traceable to the defendant's conduct), and redressability. Generalized grievances shared by all citizens generally do not satisfy the injury requirement.

Question 32Constitutional Law

A federal law grants the President authority to declare a national emergency and, upon that declaration, to impose regulations on domestic energy use. The statute provides no standard for when an emergency exists and no time limit. Which constitutional principle is most directly implicated?

  1. The nondelegation doctrine, because Congress may have delegated legislative power without an intelligible principle. Correct answer.
  2. The Bill of Attainder Clause, because the statute targets energy companies.
  3. The Presentment Clause, because the statute affects how bills become law.
  4. The Appointments Clause, because the President must appoint regulators with Senate consent.

Explanation

The nondelegation doctrine requires Congress to supply an intelligible principle when delegating authority to the executive branch. A statute with no standard or limit on emergency declarations raises the concern that Congress has delegated legislative power itself.

Question 33Constitutional Law

The President issues an executive order directing federal agencies to disregard a statute that the President believes is unconstitutional. Which statement best reflects the constitutional allocation of authority?

  1. The President may disregard the statute if the Supreme Court has not yet ruled on its constitutionality.
  2. The President may decline to enforce any statute the President believes is unconstitutional, because of the Take Care Clause.
  3. The President may suspend the statute only if Congress approves by concurrent resolution.
  4. The President must take care that the laws be faithfully executed, and may not unilaterally suspend a validly enacted statute. Correct answer.

Explanation

The Take Care Clause requires the President to faithfully execute the laws, and the President cannot unilaterally suspend or refuse to enforce a valid statute. Disagreement with Congress's constitutional judgment does not authorize suspension of enacted law.

Question 34Constitutional Law

Congress passes a statute creating a commission to adjudicate claims for veterans' benefits. The statute provides that commission members may be removed by the President only for cause. The members exercise significant authority and are appointed by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, not the President. Which is the strongest constitutional objection?

  1. The commission violates the Take Care Clause because the President cannot supervise adjudication.
  2. Appointment of principal officers by the Secretary may violate the Appointments Clause. Correct answer.
  3. The commission violates the Bill of Attainder Clause by adjudicating individual claims.
  4. The removal restrictions violate the Presentment Clause.

Explanation

Principal officers must be appointed by the President with Senate advice and consent, while inferior officers may be vested in department heads. If commission members exercise significant authority and are principal officers, appointment by the Secretary raises an Appointments Clause problem.

Question 35Constitutional Law

Which of the following best describes the political question doctrine?

  1. It allows courts to decline jurisdiction over issues committed by the Constitution to the political branches or lacking judicially manageable standards. Correct answer.
  2. It bars federal courts from hearing cases involving any political party.
  3. It permits Congress to strip federal courts of all jurisdiction over constitutional claims.
  4. It requires litigants to exhaust political remedies before filing suit.

Explanation

The political question doctrine holds that certain constitutional issues are committed to the political branches or lack judicially manageable standards, making them nonjusticiable. Examples include certain foreign affairs and impeachment trial questions.

Question 36Constitutional Law

A state enacts a law that imposes a term limit on its own members of Congress, arguing that states may regulate the qualifications of their representatives. This law is most likely:

  1. Valid, because states have broad authority over elections under the Elections Clause.
  2. Invalid, because only Congress may regulate state elections.
  3. Valid, because the Tenth Amendment reserves election regulation to the states.
  4. Invalid, because the Qualifications Clauses set the exclusive constitutional qualifications for members of Congress. Correct answer.

Explanation

In U.S. Term Limits v. Thornton, the Supreme Court held that the Qualifications Clauses set exclusive constitutional qualifications and states may not add to them. The Elections Clause allows states to regulate the times, places, and manner of elections, not to alter qualifications.

Question 37Constitutional Law

The Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, as currently interpreted, primarily protects:

  1. All fundamental rights against state infringement.
  2. A narrow set of national citizenship rights, such as the right to petition the federal government. Correct answer.
  3. Economic liberties against state regulation.
  4. The right to travel interstate.

Explanation

After the Slaughter-House Cases, the Privileges or Immunities Clause has been read to protect only a narrow set of rights of national citizenship, such as access to federal officials and the right to travel. Most Bill of Rights protections are incorporated through the Due Process Clause.

Question 38Constitutional Law

A public school district allows student groups to meet after school on a limited open forum basis. A religious student group seeks the same access as secular groups. Under the Equal Access Act and the First Amendment, the district should:

  1. Permit access on the same terms as other groups, because excluding the group would discriminate based on viewpoint. Correct answer.
  2. Deny access because religious groups are not entitled to equal access.
  3. Deny access because allowing religious speech would violate the Establishment Clause.
  4. Permit access only if the group agrees not to discuss religious topics.

Explanation

A limited open forum triggers the Equal Access Act, which bars schools receiving federal funds from denying equal access based on the religious nature of a group's speech. Excluding a religious group from an open forum discriminates based on viewpoint.

Question 39Constitutional Law

Which of the following best states the doctrine of unconstitutional conditions?

  1. Government may never attach conditions to any benefit it provides.
  2. Government may not condition the receipt of a discretionary benefit on the surrender of a constitutional right. Correct answer.
  3. Government may condition benefits only when the condition is unrelated to the benefit.
  4. Government may condition benefits on any terms because benefits are privileges, not rights.

Explanation

The unconstitutional conditions doctrine holds that government cannot require waiver of a constitutional right as a condition of receiving a discretionary benefit. The condition is invalid even though the benefit itself could be withheld entirely.

Question 40Constitutional Law

A state requires a permit to hold a parade and gives officials unlimited discretion to grant or deny permits based on the content of the message. This scheme is most vulnerable to challenge as:

  1. A valid exercise of the state's police power because public safety is involved.
  2. A valid time, place, and manner restriction because parades require permits.
  3. An invalid prior restraint because it lacks narrow, objective, and definite standards. Correct answer.
  4. An invalid bill of attainder because it targets parade organizers.

Explanation

A licensing scheme that gives officials unlimited discretion over speech is an unconstitutional prior restraint because it lacks narrow, objective, and definite standards. Permits are permissible when they are content-neutral and contain adequate procedural safeguards.

Question 41Contracts

A property owner emails a contractor: "I will pay you $8,000 to repaint my house by June 1." The contractor replies, "Agreed-I'll start Monday." Which element of contract formation is most directly satisfied by the contractor's reply?

  1. Acceptance of the offer Correct answer.
  2. The statute of frauds writing requirement
  3. Consideration flowing to the owner
  4. Capacity to contract

Explanation

An offer confers on the offeree the power to accept, and a definite, unconditional assent by the offeree creates a binding agreement. The contractor's unqualified agreement exercises that power of acceptance. Consideration, capacity, and any writing requirement are separate issues not established by the reply itself.

Question 42Contracts

A seller mails a signed offer to sell a boat for $20,000, stating it will remain open for ten days. Three days later the seller mails a revocation that the buyer receives on day five. On day four the buyer mails an acceptance. Under the mailbox rule, when is the contract formed?

  1. On day four, when the acceptance is dispatched Correct answer.
  2. When the seller actually reads the acceptance
  3. Never, because the offer was revoked before acceptance
  4. On day five, when the revocation arrives

Explanation

Under the mailbox rule, acceptance is effective upon dispatch, provided the offeree uses a reasonable medium. Because the buyer dispatched acceptance on day four, before the revocation was received on day five, the contract formed on dispatch. A revocation is effective only on receipt by the offeree.

Question 43Contracts

A homeowner promises to pay a painter $5,000 "because I feel generous" after the painter has already completed the work without any prior agreement on payment. Which doctrine most likely defeats enforcement of the promise?

  1. Anticipatory repudiation
  2. The preexisting duty rule
  3. Past consideration is no consideration Correct answer.
  4. Promissory estoppel

Explanation

Consideration must be bargained for and given in exchange for the promise; services rendered before the promise is made are past consideration and cannot support it. A gratuitous promise made after the fact lacks the required exchange. Promissory estoppel, the preexisting duty rule, and anticipatory repudiation address different situations.

Question 44Contracts

A retailer and a supplier sign a writing stating the essential terms of a sale of goods for $50,000 but omit the delivery date. Under the UCC, what is the most likely effect of the omission?

  1. The contract is void unless both parties initial a delivery term
  2. The contract is enforceable only if a court supplies a delivery date
  3. The contract is enforceable because a reasonable time for delivery is implied Correct answer.
  4. The contract fails for indefiniteness

Explanation

Under UCC Article 2, a contract for the sale of goods may be enforced despite open terms, and missing terms such as time of delivery are filled by a reasonable time. The essential terms present here support enforcement. The common law's stricter indefiniteness concerns do not control the sale of goods.

Question 45Contracts

A party seeks to enforce an oral agreement that, by its terms, cannot be performed within one year of its making. Which statute of frauds provision applies?

  1. The sale-of-goods provision
  2. The surety provision
  3. The one-year provision Correct answer.
  4. The land provision

Explanation

The one-year provision of the statute of frauds requires a writing for contracts that cannot, by their terms, be completed within one year of formation. The test is whether performance is possible within one year, not whether it actually occurs. The land, surety, and goods provisions address different subject matter.

Question 46Contracts

A buyer and seller orally agree on the sale of a $2,000 antique desk. The seller delivers the desk and the buyer accepts it, but the buyer never pays. Under the UCC, which fact most strongly supports enforceability of the oral contract despite the writing requirement?

  1. The buyer received and accepted the goods Correct answer.
  2. The parties are merchants
  3. The price exceeds $500
  4. The agreement was made in a single conversation

Explanation

Under UCC section 2-201, an oral goods contract is enforceable if the goods are received and accepted, which removes it from the writing requirement. Payment and receipt of goods serve as the substitute for a writing. Merchant status or the price alone does not cure the absence of a writing.

Question 47Contracts

A developer promises a general contractor an extra $10,000 to finish work the contractor is already contractually obligated to complete. The contractor finishes on time and demands the extra payment. What is the developer's best defense?

  1. The promise fails for lack of capacity
  2. The contractor gave no consideration because of the preexisting duty rule Correct answer.
  3. The contractor's performance was an anticipatory repudiation
  4. The promise is unenforceable because it was not in writing

Explanation

Under the preexisting duty rule, a promise to pay more for performance the promisor is already bound to render lacks consideration. The contractor gave nothing new in exchange for the extra $10,000. Exceptions exist, such as a new or different duty or a good-faith dispute, but none is stated here.

Question 48Contracts

Which of the following best describes the effect of a material breach by one party to a bilateral contract?

  1. It automatically voids the contract from the outset
  2. It converts the contract into an option contract
  3. It discharges the nonbreaching party's remaining duties and permits suit for damages Correct answer.
  4. It requires the nonbreaching party to continue performance

Explanation

A material breach excuses the nonbreaching party from further performance and gives that party a claim for damages. The contract is not void ab initio; the breach affects the parties' remaining obligations. A minor breach, by contrast, generally allows continued performance with damages.

Question 49Contracts

A company promises to pay a retiring employee a $50,000 bonus if the employee signs a release waiving all claims against the company. The employee signs and later sues for the bonus. What is the strongest basis for enforcing the promise?

  1. The promise is enforceable because it is in writing
  2. The bonus is a gift that the company must honor
  3. The employee's retirement alone is consideration
  4. The release is consideration because the employee gave up a legal claim Correct answer.

Explanation

Forbearance from asserting a claim, or the surrender of a claim through a release, is valid consideration when the claim is at least colorable. The employee gave up something of value in exchange for the bonus. A writing is not the source of consideration, and retirement alone is not a bargained-for exchange.

Question 50Contracts

An offeree receives an offer and responds, "I accept, provided you deliver by Friday instead of Monday." What is the legal effect of this response?

  1. It is a rejection only if the offeror objects
  2. It is a counteroffer that terminates the original offer Correct answer.
  3. It is a request for assurance that preserves the power of acceptance
  4. It is an acceptance that adds a minor term

Explanation

Under the common law mirror image rule, an acceptance that changes a term is not an acceptance but a counteroffer, which operates as a rejection of the original offer. The offeree's power of acceptance terminates when the counteroffer is made. Whether the change is minor does not matter at common law.