Catalase Activity and the Limits of Denaturation
During a unit on enzymes, students use potato tissue as a source of catalase, which breaks down hydrogen peroxide into water and oxygen. They place 2.0 g of fresh potato in a flask with 20 mL of 1.0% H2O2 and record the volume of O2 collected per minute. In trial set A, the buffer pH is varied while temperature is held at 25°C: pH 3 gives 4 mL/min; pH 5, 27; pH 7, 46; pH 9, 19; pH 11, 3. In trial set B, pH is held at 7 while temperature is varied: 10°C gives 9 mL/min; 20°C, 31; 30°C, 44; 40°C, 47; 50°C, 28; 60°C, 6; 70°C, 1. Each condition is run once. A classmate says, 'The enzyme is destroyed at pH 3 and at 70°C because the reaction stops.' Another says, 'At 70°C the enzyme is just sleeping; if we cool it, activity will return.'
1. Identify the optimum pH and temperature shown by the data. Explain what 'optimum' means in terms of enzyme structure and collisions, and why the rate falls on either side.
Read the worked answer
The highest rate in trial A occurs at pH 7 (46 mL/min), and in trial B at 40°C (47 mL/min). An optimum is the condition where the enzyme's active site is most often in a shape that binds substrate and positions it for reaction. pH changes alter hydrogen bonds and ionic interactions that hold the folded protein in shape; near pH 7 the shape is best, while at pH 3 or 11 the active site is distorted. Temperature affects kinetic energy and therefore collision frequency: from 10°C to 40°C, collisions increase, so rate rises. Above 40°C, increased vibration breaks bonds that maintain tertiary structure, denaturing the enzyme, so rate falls sharply. The data are single trials, so the exact peak could shift slightly with replication, but the pattern is clear.
2. A classmate claims the enzyme is 'destroyed' at pH 3 and at 70°C, while another claims the 70°C enzyme is 'just sleeping' and will recover on cooling. Evaluate both claims using the data and protein structure. What additional test would distinguish them?
Read the worked answer
At 70°C, the near-zero rate is better explained by denaturation: high temperature disrupts the weak interactions that maintain tertiary structure, and the active site loses its shape. Denaturation of a protein is usually not reversed simply by cooling, so 'sleeping' is unlikely, but the data do not prove it. At pH 3, the low rate could also reflect a reversible change in shape; many enzymes regain activity when pH is restored, so 'destroyed' is too strong without a recovery test. The key missing evidence is whether activity returns after the condition is reversed. A good test: incubate enzyme at pH 3 or 70°C for the same time, then return it to pH 7 and 25°C, add substrate, and measure O2. Recovery would support reversible inhibition; no recovery would support denaturation.
3. Describe two improvements to the experimental design that would make the temperature conclusion more reliable. For each, explain how it reduces a specific source of error.
Read the worked answer
First, run at least three trials at each temperature and graph the mean with error bars. A single trial cannot show whether a difference is real or due to measurement variation, such as inconsistent gas collection or potato variation. Replicates also let the class see whether the 40°C peak is repeatable. Second, control the potato tissue more carefully: use the same potato, cut cores of equal mass and surface area, and blot them the same way. Catalase amount and surface area affect reaction rate; if a larger or more bruised piece is used at one temperature, the rate could change for reasons unrelated to temperature. Also, equilibrate the potato in buffer at the target temperature before adding H2O2, and keep the water bath stable. These controls make temperature the main variable.