Do Both Authors Really Agree About Recess?
Students read two short texts about recess. Text A: 'Recess is not just free time. When students run and play, their brains get a break. After recess, they come back ready to focus on math and reading. Schools that keep recess see better behavior in class.' Text B: 'Recess takes time away from learning. Every minute outside is a minute not spent on reading. Schools should add more instructional time instead of longer breaks.' A student says, 'Both authors think recess is important.' The teacher wants the class to test that claim with evidence, not just agree or disagree. The class has been practicing how to compare two authors' points and how to tell when a claim is too general. The teacher also wants students to notice that two authors can discuss the same topic while making different arguments about it.
1. Is the student's claim that both authors think recess is important accurate? Use one sentence from each text to support your answer.
Read the worked answer
The claim is too general to be accurate as stated. Text A clearly treats recess as valuable: 'After recess, they come back ready to focus on math and reading.' That sentence says recess helps learning. Text B treats recess as a tradeoff, not as something valuable in itself: 'Every minute outside is a minute not spent on reading.' That sentence says recess costs instructional time. Both authors think recess matters enough to discuss, but they do not agree that it is important in the same positive way. A more accurate claim would be: 'Both authors discuss whether recess helps or hurts learning, but they take opposite positions.' The evidence shows a disagreement about the effect of recess, not shared agreement that it is important.
2. How would each author probably respond to the other's main point? Explain using evidence from both texts.
Read the worked answer
Author A would probably respond to Author B by saying that recess is not lost learning time because it improves focus. Text A says students 'come back ready to focus on math and reading,' so Author A would argue that the break helps later instruction. Author B would probably respond to Author A by saying that better focus is not enough proof and that time is limited. Text B says schools should 'add more instructional time instead of longer breaks,' so Author B would argue that every minute counts and that reading time is being traded away. The two authors are not just describing recess; they are weighing different costs and benefits. A strong comparison names each author's claim and explains how the evidence would be used in the disagreement.
3. Which sentence in Text A best supports the idea that recess helps learning, and why is it stronger evidence than the sentence about brains getting a break?
Read the worked answer
The strongest sentence is 'After recess, they come back ready to focus on math and reading.' It directly links recess to learning by naming focus and school subjects. The sentence 'When students run and play, their brains get a break' is related, but it only says the brain gets a break; it does not yet show that learning improves. The focus sentence is stronger evidence because it connects the break to a school outcome. It also supports the author's larger claim that recess is 'not just free time.' A reader should choose evidence that does the most work for the claim, not just evidence that mentions the topic.