Pre-Signed Charts and a Billing Question in the Chair
Three months into her first job at a private practice in Anne Arundel County, RDH Tessa B. notices that the owner-dentist's charts for several patients claim 'four quadrants of scaling and root planing completed' when she personally performed only a routine prophylaxis. The dentist tells her, 'Chart zero bleeding points - the insurers won't pay for perio if you write 40% bleeding,' and hands her three blank periodontal charting forms already signed and dated by him for next week's patients. He also asks her to add an examination entry dated last Friday for a patient he never saw. A patient in the chair asks her directly, 'Did the doctor really do that deep cleaning you're billing me for?' Tessa is within a 90-day probationary period, needs the income, and knows her license is on the line for anything she signs.
1. Evaluate the three requests: false bleeding scores, pre-signed blank charting forms, and a backdated exam entry. What must Tessa do?
Read the worked answer
All three are falsification, and the source of the instruction is irrelevant.
- Bleeding scores. Bleeding on probing is a clinical measurement, not a billing lever. Recording zero when 40% of sites bled misrepresents the periodontal diagnosis and the treatment rendered, and it corrupts the baseline against which future care is measured. Tessa charts what she finds, in the terms the practice uses, and lets the dentist decide how to bill.
- Pre-signed blank forms. A signature on an undated clinical finding is a fabricated record. She should not fill in a form someone else signed before the data existed; she starts a fresh form with her own findings, date, and time, and returns the pre-signed pages to the dentist.
- Backdated exam. Adding an entry for an examination that did not occur, dated to a day it did not happen, is creating a false record. She declines and documents that she declined.
What she says. 'I can't chart findings I didn't measure or sign for an exam I didn't do - if it's audited, the chart has to match reality. I'll chart this patient's actual bleeding scores today.' Keep it about the record, not about accusing him of fraud.
Documentation of her own work. Her notes should describe only care she delivered, with the date, time, teeth, and findings. If she is asked again after objecting, put the refusal in writing to the dentist and retain her own copy.
2. What are Tessa's reporting exposure and obligations, and what happens if she stays silent?
Read the worked answer
What the conduct implicates. Falsified clinical records and services billed but not rendered are grounds for Board discipline for unprofessional conduct and fraud, and may implicate insurance fraud, including Medicaid if the practice participates. Maryland's Insurance Administration fraud unit and, for Medicaid claims, the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit are the usual reporting channels; the Board takes complaints from licensees and the public.
Her own exposure. Tessa did not create the original entries, but she is the hygienist whose name will appear on perio charting. If she adopts the false scores, signs pre-signed forms, or writes an exam entry she knows is untrue, she becomes a participant, and 'my employer told me to' is not a defense to a Board complaint. Silence plus continued participation looks the same as agreement.
Obligations. First, stop participating - no more false entries from her hand. Second, object in writing once so the record shows she did not acquiesce. Third, make the reporting decision: a complaint to the Board describing the specific records and dates, with copies of the pre-signed forms and her own notes, is the defensible course. She may consult the Board's licensing staff about how to file, and she should not tip off patients with accusations she cannot support.
Retaliation. Maryland recognizes whistleblower protections for healthcare workers who report in good faith; a probationary employee is still covered. If she is disciplined or terminated after objecting, document the timeline and the stated reason.
If she stays silent and keeps charting the requested numbers, she is exposed to discipline for the same conduct, and the first audit or patient complaint will not distinguish her from the dentist.
3. Draft the response Tessa should give to the patient who asks, 'Did the doctor really do that deep cleaning you're billing me for?' and state what she should document afterward.
Read the worked answer
Answer truthfully and narrowly. She should not confirm a service she did not observe, and she should not fabricate reassurance or launch into an accusation against her employer. Something like: 'I can tell you exactly what I did at your last visit - a routine cleaning, scaling above the gumline, and fluoride. I wasn't the person who did any deeper scaling, and I can't speak to the billing. Our office manager handles billing questions and can walk you through the codes on your statement, and you're entitled to a copy of your records if you'd like one.'
Why this wording. It is accurate about her own care, it does not vouch for another clinician's work, it redirects billing to the person responsible for it, and it preserves the patient's rights, including access to records and the ability to question a charge.
What not to say. Not 'I'm sure it was done,' not 'the doctor probably did it,' and not 'they're committing fraud.' The first two are untrue, and the third is an accusation she should make to the Board, not across an operatory.
Documentation. A brief note: patient asked about billing for periodontal therapy on [date]; hygienist described the services she personally provided; billing question referred to the office manager; patient informed of right to a copy of records. Do not editorialize about the dentist's conduct in the patient chart.
Follow-through. Tell the office manager the question came up so the billing explanation is handled consistently. If patients repeatedly ask why they were billed for treatment no one performed, that pattern is part of what she documents and reports - it is no longer an isolated question in the chair.