Grace Period, Policy Loan, and a BAC Exclusion: What Actually Gets Paid
Marcus, 47, owned a $750,000 whole life policy with a $250,000 accidental death benefit rider. In November he borrowed $62,000 against the policy; by the time of his death $2,100 of interest had accrued and was unpaid. His $9,000 annual premium was due January 1, and he had not paid it when he died on February 12 in a single-vehicle crash. The policy's grace period is 31 days. Toxicology showed a blood alcohol concentration of 0.11; the accidental death rider excludes death while operating a vehicle with a BAC of 0.08 or above. The beneficiary designation, signed in 2015, names "my wife, Dana." Marcus and Dana divorced in 2019, and he married Renee in 2021. The contingent beneficiary is "children of the insured, equally"; Marcus has two children, ages 22 and 19.
1. How much will the insurer pay, to whom, and why?
Read the worked answer
Amount: $685,900, payable to Dana as the named primary beneficiary.
- Grace period protects the base policy. Death on February 12 falls inside the 31-day grace period, so the policy was in force even though the January 1 premium was unpaid. The carrier deducts the unpaid premium from the proceeds.
- Arithmetic: $750,000 base face − $62,000 loan principal − $2,100 accrued loan interest − $9,000 unpaid annual premium = $676,900. (If the policy's loan interest continues to accrue to date of payment, the net figure drops a bit further.)
- The accidental death rider does not pay. The 0.11 BAC squarely triggers the rider's 0.08 exclusion; accidental death riders are also commonly limited to deaths within 90–180 days of the accident, which is satisfied here but irrelevant once the exclusion applies. Death is paid under the base policy only.
- To Dana, not Renee. The insurer's contractual duty is to the designated beneficiary. Divorce alone does not automatically revoke a life insurance beneficiary designation in most jurisdictions; that is generally a matter for a court (constructive trust, or a state revocation-on-divorce statute). Expect the carrier to consider an interpleader if Renee asserts a claim. The children are contingent and take nothing unless the primary designation fails.
2. What are the income and estate tax consequences, and why?
Read the worked answer
Income tax: none on the death benefit. Estate tax: the net proceeds are included.
- IRC §101(a): life insurance proceeds paid by reason of death are excluded from the beneficiary's gross income - Dana owes nothing on $676,900.
- No income tax on the loan either. The November loan was a borrowing against the carrier's own funds, not a distribution of gain; it reduced the death benefit rather than creating income.
- Estate inclusion: Marcus owned the policy outright at death, so he held incidents of ownership. The amount included is the net proceeds receivable, roughly $676,900, which lands in his gross estate. That may be harmless if he is far under the federal exclusion and Maryland's estate tax threshold, but it is still reported.
- The takeaway for planning: outright ownership plus a large estate is exactly the fact pattern that calls for an irrevocable life insurance trust.
3. Suppose Marcus had instead assigned ownership of the policy to an irrevocable life insurance trust two years before his death. Would the answer change?
Read the worked answer
Yes - inclusion comes back under the three-year rule.
- IRC §2035(a) pulls back into the gross estate any policy transferred within three years of death. A transfer two years before death is ineffective for estate inclusion, even though the trust is valid and the trustee receives the proceeds.
- The income tax result is unchanged: proceeds are still received income-tax-free by the trust, which can then lend to or purchase assets from the estate.
- What would have made the transfer work: completion more than three years before death, a properly drafted trust, a named trustee who is not the insured, and clean assignment paperwork with the carrier.
- Secondary point: the accidental death rider would still not pay, because the exclusion travels with the policy regardless of who owns it.