MD MFT Juris study materials
MD MFT Juris study resources

Individual Disclosure in Conjoint Therapy and a Subpoena

MD MFT Juris · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Individual Disclosure in Conjoint Therapy and a Subpoena

A Maryland LCMFT in Baltimore has been seeing a married couple for 12 conjoint sessions. The intake form described the client as 'the couple' but did not include a written no-secrets policy. In the most recent session, the therapist met separately with one spouse, who disclosed a six-month affair and said she had been treated for gonorrhea last week. She begged the therapist not to tell her husband and said she would deny it if confronted. The husband later emailed asking for 'the complete file, including your notes from her individual session,' adding that his divorce attorney has subpoenaed the records. The therapist's file contains a detailed individual-session note, the couple's treatment plan, and billing records. The husband has not signed a release, and the wife has not authorized disclosure of the individual note. The therapist wonders whether to release the file, warn the husband about the STI, or tell the husband about the affair.

1. What confidentiality framework should the therapist have established at intake, and what should the therapist do now about the wife's individual disclosure?

Read the worked answer

The core error was treating conjoint therapy as if it had the same individual confidentiality as one-to-one therapy. In conjoint treatment, the couple is the client; the therapist should state in writing at intake that information shared in joint sessions is part of the couple's record and may be discussed in treatment. If the therapist offers individual sessions, the policy should say either that no secrets will be kept or that the therapist will hold a secret only if the client agrees in advance that the therapist may pressure disclosure and may withdraw from therapy if it cannot be resolved. Here, the therapist should not have promised blanket secrecy. Now the therapist should meet the wife, explain that the affair and STI are clinically material to the couple's treatment and to the husband's health, and give her a limited time to disclose with the therapist's support. If she refuses, the therapist should not continue conjoint therapy while holding the secret; the therapist may need to help the couple transfer or terminate with referral. Documentation should state the policy, the disclosure, and the safety discussion, without gratuitous detail. The therapist should not tell the husband unilaterally at this stage; that would breach the wife's individual communication and inflame the situation, but the therapist also cannot silently keep a secret that undermines the couple's treatment.

2. How should the therapist respond to the husband's request and the subpoena?

Read the worked answer

A records request from one member of a couple is not the same as a request from an individual client. The husband is a client, so he may have a right to the couple's record; the wife is also a client and the note contains her individual disclosure. The therapist should not release the complete file on the email request alone. Verify who signed the intake consent, whether both spouses authorized release, and whether the subpoena is validly served. A subpoena is not automatic authorization to disclose; the therapist should notify both clients, assert any applicable privilege, and seek a court order or written authorizations. If release is required, provide only the records covered, redact third-party information, and consider a treatment summary rather than raw process notes. Do not destroy or alter records. Consult a health-care attorney and the Board if unclear. The STI information should be handled separately as sensitive health information. If the husband's attorney demands immediate production, the therapist can state in writing that the records are being reviewed for privilege and legal requirements.

3. Does the gonorrhea diagnosis create a duty to warn the husband? Explain.

Read the worked answer

A gonorrhea diagnosis in a married client creates a real health risk to the husband, but Maryland's confidentiality exceptions are not a general duty to warn for STIs. The therapist should first assess the facts: Is the wife currently infectious? Is she having unprotected sex with the husband? Has she refused to disclose? The therapist should strongly encourage her to tell him or to have a physician do partner notification, and should document that advice. If she refuses and the risk is serious and imminent, the therapist should consult an attorney and the Board before any limited disclosure; some jurisdictions permit disclosure to prevent serious harm, but the safer course is to use public-health partner notification and not to disclose without legal authority. The therapist should not tell the husband about the affair as a way to disclose the STI. If disclosure is ultimately justified, release only the minimum necessary health information, not the affair details. The therapist should also revisit whether conjoint therapy can continue.