Three Doubles and a Prescription Bottle
A 58-year-old regular, Dale, arrives at a Maine tavern at 7 p.m. and orders a bourbon and water. Over the next 95 minutes he has three doubles - roughly six standard drinks - and at the table he takes two pills from a prescription bottle. A friend mentions Dale takes clonazepam for anxiety. By 8:50 p.m. Dale is slurring, has knocked over a glass, and is fumbling for his keys; he insists he is 'fine, only had three.' His pickup is 30 feet from the door, and he lives 12 minutes away on a two-lane road. When the server hesitates on his next order, he becomes loud and angry and says he will 'take his business elsewhere.' The bar is busy, the manager is in the back office, and the server is working the service well alone.
1. At what point did service become unlawful, and what evidence supports that beyond Dale's own count of his drinks?
Read the worked answer
Service became unlawful once Dale showed signs of visible intoxication - no later than the third double, and arguably the second.
- Quantity and pace: three doubles is about six standard drinks in 95 minutes. For most adults that already pushes blood alcohol past the legal driving limit.
- The medication: clonazepam is a benzodiazepine. Combined with alcohol it produces additive sedation, poor coordination, and blackout risk at much lower alcohol levels. The pills are not a mitigating detail; they raise the risk.
- Observed behavior: slurred speech, a knocked-over glass, fumbling for keys, and anger at being questioned. Those are precisely the behaviors the 'visibly intoxicated' standard describes.
- The count: his 'only three' is not evidence of anything, and a server does not need a breath test to refuse. The refusal standard is what the server sees, not what the guest claims.
Maine's civil damages statute lets an injured third party sue a licensee that served a visibly intoxicated person. The cutoff belonged at the first slur, not at 8:50.
2. It is 8:50 p.m. and he wants his keys and his next drink. Lay out what the server does, in order.
Read the worked answer
The goal is that Dale gets no more alcohol and does not drive.
- Refuse clearly, without debate: 'I can't serve you any more alcohol tonight. I'm not going to argue about it.' Short, flat, final.
- Control the keys without a physical struggle. If they are on the bar, move them to the manager. If they are in his pocket, ask - never grab.
- Offer real alternatives: water, food, a taxi or rideshare on the house, a call to a family member. Coffee and a cold shower do not lower BAC; offer them as comfort, never as a cure.
- Get the manager and a second staff member. Do not manage an angry intoxicated man alone at a service well, and keep an exit route open.
- If he walks to the truck, call 911 with the plate, direction of travel, and description. A refused guest who drives is a public safety call, not a lost tip.
- Write it down immediately: times, drinks, behaviors, who was told, what was offered.
3. The next morning the manager asks why the paperwork matters. Explain what must be documented and what should not be written.
Read the worked answer
If a claim or an inspection arrives Monday, Saturday's log is the defense.
Record: arrival time, each drink with its time, the observation of pills and who saw it, the specific signs (slurred speech, spill, fumbling for keys, raised voice), the exact time service was cut off, who was notified, whether a ride was offered and refused, and whether police were called. Keep the tab and the payment record and note who paid.
Do not write conclusions such as 'he was wasted' or 'he's an alcoholic.' Write observations: 'speech slurred, could not pick up change, staggered when standing.' Never edit the point-of-sale record after the fact.
Report to the licensee and the insurer promptly. If Dale was stopped on the road, the police report will name the tavern. A contemporaneous log with a clear cutoff time is what separates a defensible file from a suspension and a civil payout.