Delegation to an Experienced Optician
A busy Portland practice hires a certified optician with 15 years of experience. The optometrist is double-booked. The optician performs non-contact tonometry, autorefraction, lensometry, and, when the OD is with another patient, performs a manifest refraction and writes the final spectacle prescription. The optician also evaluates a soft contact lens fit, changes the base curve from 8.6 to 8.3, and tells the patient the new prescription will be ordered. The OD later signs the spectacle prescription without rechecking and does not review the contact lens change. A patient complains of blurred vision. The Board investigator asks what tasks may be delegated to unlicensed personnel and what supervision was required. The optician says the OD 'always trusts my numbers' and that the practice has done it this way for years.
1. Which of the optician's tasks may be delegated under Maine Board rules, and which may not?
Read the worked answer
The Board's delegation rule distinguishes technical tasks from professional judgment. Non-contact tonometry, autorefraction, and lensometry are commonly delegable as preliminary tests if the OD establishes a protocol and is available on site. A manifest refraction, diagnosis, and final spectacle prescription are professional services; even if a technician gathers data, the OD must perform or verify the refraction and own the prescription. Contact lens fitting and parameter changes require the OD's evaluation because they involve corneal physiology, fit, and prescription authority. The optician's experience does not expand the legal scope. The fact that the practice has done it for years is not a defense; a customary violation is still a violation.
2. What supervision and documentation failures does the scenario show?
Read the worked answer
Signing a prescription without rechecking is not supervision; it is rubber-stamping. The Board expects the supervising OD to be physically present or immediately available as the rule requires, to set written protocols, and to review the delegated data before relying on it. The OD did not review the contact lens change at all, so there was no professional judgment behind the new base curve. The record should show who performed each test, what the OD reviewed, and the OD's interpretation and plan. The blurred-vision complaint should trigger a re-examination and an honest record entry. The practice should stop the optician from performing manifest refractions and contact lens changes until the OD verifies the Board's delegation limits and implements a supervision policy.