Met Police Exam study materials
Met Police Exam study resources

Met Police Exam: Logical Reasoning and Problem Solving

Met Police Exam · Work through your exam, one topic at a time.

All guide sections

Logical Reasoning and Problem Solving

This domain tests deductive and inductive reasoning: syllogisms, conditional statements, ordering, grouping and identifying assumptions. You must decide what necessarily follows from the information given, not what is plausible in the real world.

Core rules

  • 'If P then Q' does not mean 'if Q then P'.
  • 'Only if' introduces a necessary condition, not a sufficient one.
  • From 'all A are B' you cannot conclude 'all B are A'.
  • From 'some A are B' you cannot conclude 'some A are not B'.
  • Draw only conclusions that must be true; test each option against the premises.

Worked example

Premises: 'If the alarm is activated, the keyholder is called. The keyholder was not called.' Question: What necessarily follows? A The alarm was activated. B The alarm was not activated. C The keyholder was unavailable. D Someone forgot to call. Reasoning: B follows by valid contrapositive reasoning. If activation always leads to a call, and no call occurred, activation cannot have occurred. A contradicts the premises. C and D introduce explanations not given. This is not a guess about what probably happened; it is the only conclusion forced by the logic.

Traps

Affirming the consequent ('Q, therefore P'); denying the antecedent ('not P, therefore not Q'); reversing 'all' and 'some'; adding real-world assumptions; choosing an answer that explains the situation rather than one that follows from it.