The Complaint and the Cleaned-Up File
Dr. D receives a letter from the Michigan licensing agency saying a former patient filed a complaint alleging that Dr. D billed for eight visits when the patient attended four and that Dr. D used the patient’s before-and-after x-ray images in a Facebook ad without permission. Dr. D is worried. He asks his office manager to “clean up” the file by deleting two canceled appointments, adding a note that the patient “was difficult and noncompliant,” and printing a new consent form for the patient to sign with an earlier date. The manager has not yet done anything. Dr. D also wants to call the patient and offer a refund if she withdraws the complaint. The patient’s records include a signed financial policy, treatment notes, and a separate photo-release form that the patient never signed. Dr. D says the ad was ‘educational’ and that the images did not show her face.
1. Evaluate Dr. D’s proposed record changes.
Read the worked answer
Dr. D's proposed changes are improper. Deleting canceled appointments, adding a 'difficult and noncompliant' note, and creating a backdated consent form would falsify the record and could be treated as spoliation or fraud. Once a complaint is filed, the practice should preserve all records, including scheduling data, billing records, the ad, and the unsigned photo release. If Dr. D believes a note is incomplete, he may add a dated addendum that explains the correction and identifies the original entry; he must not erase the original. The canceled appointments may be relevant to the billing allegation, so deleting them is especially damaging. The new consent form must not be presented as if signed earlier. Dr. D should notify his malpractice carrier and consult counsel before responding to the agency. He should not contact the patient to discourage the complaint.
2. What are the ethical and legal issues in offering a refund in exchange for withdrawing the complaint?
Read the worked answer
A refund can be appropriate if Dr. D actually overbilled, but it must not be conditioned on withdrawal of the complaint. The disciplinary process belongs to the state, not the patient; a private settlement does not automatically end an agency investigation, and offering money to withdraw can look like obstruction or improper inducement. Dr. D should separate the billing correction from the complaint response. If he owes a refund, he should document the calculation and issue it without a confidentiality or withdrawal condition, unless counsel advises a lawful settlement. He should not ask the patient to sign a statement that the care was fine. He should respond truthfully to the agency, including admitting any billing error. Candor and corrective action are more credible than a payment designed to make the complaint disappear.
3. What should Dr. D do about the Facebook ad and the unsigned photo release?
Read the worked answer
The Facebook ad raises privacy and consent issues. Even if the patient's face is not shown, before-and-after x-rays can be identifiable health information, especially with a small practice and a specific injury. A separate photo-release form exists but was never signed, so Dr. D lacks authorization. He should remove the ad immediately, preserve a copy for the investigation, and stop using patient images without a valid written authorization. He should not ask the patient to sign a release now with an earlier date. He should review his social-media and marketing practices, train staff, and document the corrective action. The claim that the ad was 'educational' does not cure the missing authorization. The board may consider the unauthorized use as unprofessional conduct, and separate privacy laws may apply.