Home-Based Business Fire in a Detached Garage Under an HO-3
The Okonkwos own a 1952 home insured on an unendorsed HO-3 (HO 00 03 05 11) with Coverage A $350,000, Coverage C $175,000, replacement cost on the dwelling, and a $1,000 deductible. Fourteen months ago they converted the detached garage into a candle-making business, storing $28,000 of finished inventory and $9,000 of wax and supplies there. A wax melter ignites; the garage is a total loss ($120,000 to rebuild) and fire damages the house ($40,000). Rebuilding will trigger $16,000 of code-required electrical and egress work. The family must rent for five months at $4,100 a month. Business revenue loss is $30,000. The Okonkwos believe their homeowners policy covers everything because the loss happened at home.
1. Itemize what the policy pays and what it does not, and identify the largest uninsured number.
Read the worked answer
Dwelling (Coverage A): $40,000 replacement cost, covered - fire is a named peril.
Detached garage (Coverage B): Coverage B is 10% of Coverage A, or $35,000, and the HO-3 generally excludes other structures used in whole or in part for business purposes. Read the exact form language, but the defensible position is that a garage converted to a candle business is outside Coverage B absent an endorsement. That is the biggest gap: about $85,000 of structure.
Business personal property: subject to the special limit for property used primarily for business (commonly $2,500 on the residence premises under the ISO form), so $28,000 of inventory and $9,000 of supplies are almost entirely uninsured.
Ordinance or law: 10% of Coverage A ($35,000) is available, so the $16,000 of code work on the house is covered.
Loss of use: Coverage D is typically 30% of Coverage A ($105,000); $20,500 of rent is covered with proper documentation.
Business income: not covered - business pursuits are excluded.
Deductible: one $1,000 deductible per occurrence across Section I, not one per coverage.
2. The Okonkwos want to keep the business and stay with the same carrier. What do you recommend and why?
Read the worked answer
Rebuild the program, do not patch it.
- Increase Coverage B (or schedule the garage) to full replacement cost, with an endorsement permitting business occupancy of the other structure. Without the business-use carve-back, the structure stays uninsured no matter how high the limit.
- Endorse business personal property - either a scheduled limit or a home-business endorsement - at $40,000-plus and confirm the valuation basis.
- Add business income / extra expense for the home business if the endorsement offers it; the HO-3 excludes it.
- Raise ordinance or law to 25% or functional replacement cost if the 1952 house will need more code work.
- Consider equipment breakdown for the melter and any kiln or boiler, and confirm the carrier accepts a candle-making (open-flame/wax) risk at all.
Alternative to price for the client: a businessowners policy for the candle operation plus a homeowners policy with a business-occupancy endorsement on the garage. Compare the total, not just the HO premium, and document the recommendation either way.