The Late-Night Rental Car and the Dog Sniff
At 11:47 p.m., Officer Reyes stops a rented sedan because the rear license plate light is out. The driver, a 24-year-old from Ohio, produces a valid license and rental agreement; the passenger keeps a backpack on his lap. Reyes notices the driver's hands trembling, two cell phones in the console, and a pine air freshener. Reyes asks the driver to sit in the patrol car, runs checks, and finds no warrants. About five minutes later, the checks are complete. Reyes asks for consent to search; the driver says, 'I'd rather not.' Reyes replies, 'Then we'll wait for a dog.' The K9 arrives 14 minutes later and alerts on the passenger door. A search finds methamphetamine in the passenger's backpack.
1. Was Reyes permitted to order the driver and passenger out of the car? Explain the constitutional rule and how it applies to these facts.
Read the worked answer
Rule: Under Pennsylvania v. Mimms and Maryland v. Wilson, an officer may order the driver and passengers out of a lawfully stopped vehicle without separate reasonable suspicion, because the intrusion is minimal and officer safety is a legitimate concern. Application: The initial stop was lawful because the plate light was out. Ordering both occupants out was therefore permissible. The officer may require them to remain in a safe location while the stop is completed, but the detention must still be reasonable in duration and scope. Ordering them out does not, by itself, authorize a search of their persons or belongings.
2. Did the stop become unlawfully prolonged before the K9 arrived? Identify when the lawful stop ended and what facts could have justified an extension.
Read the worked answer
Rule: Under Rodriguez v. United States, a traffic stop may not be extended beyond the time reasonably required to complete the stop's mission absent reasonable suspicion of separate criminal activity. Application: The mission was essentially complete once the license and warrant checks returned clean, about five minutes in. Asking for consent was permissible, but refusing consent does not itself create suspicion. Waiting an additional 14 minutes for the K9 extended the stop. The officer would need specific, articulable facts supporting reasonable suspicion. Trembling hands, two phones, an air freshener, an out-of-state rental, and a nervous passenger are weak and often consistent with innocent travel; nervousness alone is generally not enough. If the court finds no reasonable suspicion, the prolonged detention is unlawful and the methamphetamine is likely suppressible as fruit of the poisonous tree.
3. Assume the dog's alert was lawful. May officers search the passenger's backpack? What limits apply?
Read the worked answer
Rule: Under Wyoming v. Houghton, probable cause to search a vehicle for contraband extends to passengers' belongings found in the vehicle that are capable of concealing the object of the search. Application: A reliable dog alert on the vehicle can supply probable cause to search the passenger compartment and containers within it, including the passenger's backpack, if the backpack could contain the suspected contraband. Officers may not, however, use the vehicle search as authority to search the passenger's person without independent probable cause or a valid arrest. The search must stay within the scope of the probable cause-places where methamphetamine could be hidden.