Ayar Microfinance: Loan Loss Allowance and Going Concern Under Deadline Pressure
Ayar Microfinance Co. Ltd is a Yangon-based microfinance institution with a loan portfolio of MMK 12 billion at 31 March 2025. About 65% of the portfolio is in one agricultural region. Loans overdue by more than 90 days have risen from 3% to 9% of the portfolio during the year. Management has recorded an allowance for loan losses of MMK 180 million, based on a historical loss rate of 1.2% applied to the portfolio, with no adjustment for the current overdue trend or the regional drought. The company's cash flow forecast for the next 12 months shows a small positive balance, but it relies on a MMK 1.5 billion bank loan that has not yet been approved and a MMK 500 million capital injection from a director, which is not documented. After the year end, a large borrower owing MMK 500 million defaulted. The audit partner is under pressure from the engagement partner to issue the report before the bank's credit committee meets.
1. Evaluate the appropriateness of management's allowance for loan losses and describe the audit procedures you would perform.
Read the worked answer
The allowance is likely understated. A 1.2% historical loss rate applied to the whole portfolio ignores the 9% 90-day overdue rate, the 65% regional concentration, and the drought. Under an expected credit loss approach, the allowance should reflect probability-weighted forward-looking information, including the post-year-end default of MMK 500 million. The MMK 180 million allowance is only 1.5% of the portfolio and does not respond to the deterioration. Audit procedures: obtain and test the loan aging; agree samples to loan files and repayments; test the ECL model's segmentation, loss rates, and macroeconomic assumptions; challenge management's failure to adjust for current conditions; inspect collateral and recovery estimates; review post-year-end collections and defaults; recalculate the allowance; consider using an auditor's expert; and evaluate whether the financial statements disclose the estimation uncertainty. If management refuses to adjust, the auditor should consider a qualified or adverse opinion, depending on materiality.
2. Assess the going concern assumption and its effect on the audit report.
Read the worked answer
Going concern is doubtful. The forecast shows only a small positive balance and depends on a MMK 1.5 billion bank loan not yet approved and a MMK 500 million director injection that is undocumented. Those are not sufficiently supported. The auditor should obtain the loan application, correspondence with the bank, board minutes, and written confirmation of the director's commitment and ability to fund. The auditor should also test the cash flow forecast for reasonableness and perform a sensitivity analysis. If the material uncertainty remains but disclosures are adequate, the auditor issues an unmodified opinion with a separate 'Material Uncertainty Related to Going Concern' section. If disclosures are inadequate, the opinion should be qualified or adverse. If the going concern basis is not appropriate, the financial statements should be prepared on a liquidation basis; otherwise the opinion should be adverse.
3. What ethical and documentation issues arise from the pressure to sign before the bank meeting?
Read the worked answer
The pressure to sign before the bank's credit committee creates an intimidation threat to objectivity. The auditor must not let an artificial deadline override the need for sufficient appropriate evidence. The engagement partner should escalate the matter within the firm, consult the ethics or quality function, and document the pressure, the evidence obtained, and the rationale for any decision. The audit file should show the going concern and allowance conclusions, including the post-year-end default. If the pressure continues and the firm cannot comply with professional standards, it should consider withdrawing from the engagement and communicating with those charged with governance. Signing an unadjusted report to meet a bank deadline would breach professional scepticism and integrity.