MN Chiropractic Jurisprudence study materials
MN Chiropractic Jurisprudence study resources

The Bruised Eight-Year-Old

MN Chiropractic Jurisprudence · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

The Bruised Eight-Year-Old

Dr. R is treating an 8-year-old boy for neck pain after a playground fall. The mother says he fell off a slide two days ago. During the exam, Dr. R sees bruises on both upper arms in different colors, a healed burn-shaped mark on the forearm, and the child flinches when the mother raises her voice. The mother says the boy 'bruises easily' and asks Dr. R not to write anything about the bruises because 'it's a family matter.' Dr. R plans to adjust the cervical spine, which he has never done on a child this young, and to tell the mother that if she does not consent to X-rays he will report her. The child is quiet and will not make eye contact.

1. What are Dr. R's mandatory reporting obligations, and what should he not do?

Read the worked answer

Dr. R must report suspected child abuse or neglect. Minnesota health care professionals are mandated reporters, and the trigger is reasonable suspicion, not proof or certainty. The bruises in different stages, the burn-shaped mark, the child's flinching, and the request to keep the findings secret are enough to require a report to the local welfare agency or law enforcement. He should not promise the mother confidentiality, bargain with her, conduct his own investigation, or confront the family in a way that risks the child's safety. He should make the report promptly, document exactly what he observed and what was said using objective language, and continue to meet the child's immediate clinical needs. If the child is at risk of immediate harm, he should involve emergency services. The report should be made even if the mother later gives a plausible explanation.

2. Evaluate the informed-consent issues in the proposed cervical adjustment and X-ray demand.

Read the worked answer

Informed consent for a minor requires consent from a parent or legal guardian plus, where appropriate, the child's assent. Dr. R should explain the diagnosis, the proposed cervical adjustment, the material risks and benefits, alternatives, and what will happen if care is declined. If he has not been trained to perform cervical adjustments on a child this age, he should refer rather than learn on the patient. He also should not use the threat of a child-abuse report as leverage to obtain consent for X-rays. The reporting duty is independent of the mother's treatment decisions. If X-rays are clinically indicated, he should explain why and obtain proper consent; if they are not indicated, he should not order them. The child's quiet behavior should be noted, but it does not replace the reporting analysis.

3. How should the encounter be documented, including the mother's request and the report?

Read the worked answer

The record should be objective and non-accusatory. It should include the history as given, the child's behavior, the location, size, color, and shape of each bruise or mark, and the mother's exact request not to document the bruises. A body diagram can help. Dr. R should note that a report was made, to whom, and when, but he should not include a lengthy investigation or conclusions about who caused the injuries. He should document the treatment decision, any referral, and the informed-consent discussion. He should not alter the note later to soften it, and he should not omit the bruises because the mother asked. If the child returns, the record should show ongoing objective findings and any safety concerns. Accurate documentation protects the child and demonstrates that the chiropractor met both clinical and reporting duties.