Spruce Row, Gravel Drive, and a 2005 Rebar Set 8.4 Feet Off
Two rural parcels in Otter Tail County were split by a 1978 deed. Parcel A's deed begins at the NW corner of the SE 1/4 of Section 22, thence east 660.00 ft, thence south 330.00 ft, thence west 660.00 ft, thence north to the point of beginning. In 2005, a surveyor set a 5/8-inch rebar at a point 8.4 ft north of the deed's south line and called it the southeast corner; the rebar is not a GLO monument, and the 2005 map does not explain the offset. Since 1996, the owners of A and B have mowed to a row of spruce trees and maintained a gravel drive along that line. Both have treated the spruce row as the boundary, and neither has objected. A 2025 survey retraces the deed line 8.4 ft south of the spruce row. The buyer of A wants a 'clean' survey showing the spruce row as the boundary because 'it has been that way for almost 30 years.'
1. Evaluate whether the spruce row can be recognized as the boundary under Minnesota boundary law, identifying the doctrine and the facts that matter.
Read the worked answer
The strongest theory is boundary by practical location, specifically acquiescence. Minnesota courts require a visible line or boundary, mutual recognition by the adjoining owners that the line is the boundary, and acquiescence for the statutory period-commonly 15 years. The facts here are favorable: a visible spruce row, a maintained gravel drive, both owners treating the row as the line since 1996, and no objection. But mowing alone is weak; the claimant must show the parties intended the row as the boundary, not merely that they avoided dispute. Adverse possession is an alternative for the 8.4-ft strip, but it requires actual, open, hostile, exclusive, and continuous possession for 15 years. A shared drive can raise exclusivity and permission questions. The 2005 rebar is not an original GLO monument and is not a called-for monument; it is a later surveyor-set marker and may be evidence of intent, but it does not control the deed line.
2. What should the 2025 survey show, and what legal effect does the 2005 rebar have?
Read the worked answer
The 2025 survey should show the deed line from the 1978 description, the spruce row and gravel drive as occupation evidence, and the 2005 rebar with a note that it is a surveyor-set monument 8.4 ft north of the deed line. The surveyor should not label the spruce row as the deed boundary unless a court or a valid boundary agreement establishes it. The 2005 rebar is not controlling over the deed because it is neither an original government monument nor a monument called for by the deed; its location may be relevant to practical location or estoppel, but it cannot by itself move the deed line. The client should be advised that a 'clean' survey showing only the spruce row would hide the record discrepancy. Resolution options include a written boundary agreement, a quiet-title action, or accepting the deed line with the occupation shown as an exception.