The Handgun, the Ex-Girlfriend, and the Friday Deadline
D is a 38-year-old client with PTSD and alcohol use disorder. He has been drinking heavily for two weeks. In session he says he has bought a handgun and plans to go to his ex-girlfriend Tanya's workplace on Friday because she "humiliated" him and "needs to pay." He shows you text messages in which he threatened her. He describes the workplace, the time he plans to arrive, and says he has "nothing to lose." He denies suicidal ideation but says he may not survive the encounter. He refuses to sign a release allowing you to contact Tanya or anyone else. You are an LMFT in solo private practice with no on-call colleague. It is Wednesday afternoon.
1. Analyze the duty-to-warn/protect issue under Minnesota law and the ethical standards for MFTs.
Read the worked answer
This is not merely a confidentiality question; it is a serious-danger assessment that may trigger a duty to warn or protect. Minnesota law and MFT ethics permit or require disclosure when a client presents a serious threat of violence to an identifiable victim. The facts are strong: a specific target, a specific location and date, a weapon, recent heavy drinking, explicit threats, and a statement suggesting desperation. You should assess imminence, intent, planning, access to the weapon, protective factors, and whether intoxication is increasing risk. The absence of suicidal ideation does not cancel the homicide risk. Because D refuses releases, you cannot rely on his permission. You may disclose the minimum information necessary to Tanya and law enforcement to prevent harm, and you should consider whether an emergency mental health hold under Minn. Stat. ch. 253B is appropriate. Document your risk assessment and rationale carefully. The duty is not satisfied by a vague warning; protective action may include warning the target, notifying police, and arranging emergency evaluation.
2. What concrete steps should you take now, and in what order?
Read the worked answer
First, do not leave D alone if he is highly agitated; consider calling 911 or mobile crisis for an emergency evaluation if he meets the imminent-danger threshold. If he leaves, contact law enforcement immediately with the specific threat, weapon, target, workplace, and Friday timeframe. Then warn Tanya directly using the minimum information necessary, or ask law enforcement to do so if that is safer. Tell her what D said, that he has a handgun, and that she should contact police and consider workplace security. Do not disclose unrelated therapy details. Document each call, time, person, and information shared. Follow up with D's safety and the legal aftermath, and consult an attorney or risk-management consultant as soon as possible. If you are unsure whether to warn, the safer course is to consult while taking interim protective steps. Do not wait until Friday or rely on D's promise to stop drinking.
3. D learns you disclosed and says you broke confidentiality. How do you respond clinically and document it?
Read the worked answer
Acknowledge D's anger without apologizing for the safety disclosure. Explain that confidentiality has limits when there is a serious threat to an identifiable person and that you disclosed only what was necessary to protect Tanya and the public. Do not argue about whether the threat was "real"; review what he said and your safety concern. Reassess risk, encourage continued treatment, and discuss the legal consequences. Document D's response, the disclosure, your rationale, and any new risk information. If D threatens you or becomes more agitated, repeat the emergency and law-enforcement steps. Consult an attorney about the disclosure and record-keeping. In the record, avoid speculation; quote statements and describe observable behavior. The clinical task is to preserve safety and the treatment alliance if possible, not to convince D that you were right.