MO Chiropractic Jurisprudence study materials
MO Chiropractic Jurisprudence study resources

Tuberculosis in the Daycare Worker and the Impaired Associate

MO Chiropractic Jurisprudence · Put your knowledge to work in context.

All case studies

Tuberculosis in the Daycare Worker and the Impaired Associate

Dr. Nguyen, a chiropractor, sees a 34-year-old man with three weeks of cough, night sweats, weight loss, and mid-back pain. An urgent care report states that the patient’s sputum AFB smear is positive and that a chest x-ray shows a cavitary lesion; he has not started treatment. He works at a daycare and takes two buses to appointments. He begs Dr. Nguyen not to tell anyone because he fears losing his job. Dr. Nguyen’s unvaccinated front-desk assistant checked him in and sat near him for 20 minutes. Later that afternoon, Dr. Nguyen smells alcohol on the breath of his associate, Dr. Reed, who is about to see a full schedule of patients. Dr. Reed says, “I’m fine, I just had a couple of drinks at lunch.”

1. Does Dr. Nguyen have a duty to report the tuberculosis to the local health authority? Address confidentiality and HIPAA.

Read the worked answer

Yes. Tuberculosis is a reportable communicable disease in Missouri, and health care providers who diagnose or suspect it must report to the local public health authority under the applicable reporting rules. Dr. Nguyen does not need the patient’s permission to make a public-health report. HIPAA permits disclosures to public health authorities for disease prevention and control, and the patient’s fear of job loss does not override the legal reporting duty. Dr. Nguyen should explain to the patient, in plain language, that the law requires reporting and that the health department will handle contact tracing and treatment referral. He should report promptly, provide the information required by the health department, and document the report. He should not post about the case, tell the daycare directly without public-health guidance, or disclose the diagnosis to unnecessary staff. The public-health exception is narrow: it permits disclosure to the authority for public-health purposes, not general gossip or marketing.

2. What should Dr. Nguyen do about staff exposure and the daycare and bus contacts?

Read the worked answer

Dr. Nguyen should notify the exposed front-desk assistant that she may have been exposed, without unnecessarily identifying the patient, and arrange evaluation through the health department or occupational health. The assistant should be assessed for symptoms and latent TB infection according to public-health guidance. The office should follow infection-control guidance, including masking the patient if he returns and cleaning the area. Dr. Nguyen should not personally call the daycare or the bus company to announce the diagnosis; the local health authority is responsible for contact investigation and will determine which contacts need evaluation. If the patient refuses treatment or continues exposing others, Dr. Nguyen should report that to the health department. He should document the exposure, the advice given to staff, and the public-health referral. The goal is to protect contacts while minimizing unnecessary disclosure.

3. What are Dr. Nguyen’s obligations regarding Dr. Reed’s apparent impairment?

Read the worked answer

Patient safety comes first. Dr. Nguyen should not allow Dr. Reed to see patients while there is a reasonable suspicion of impairment. He should remove Dr. Reed from clinical duties for the day, arrange safe transportation, and document the objective observations and the action taken. He should avoid making a diagnosis or accusing Dr. Reed in front of staff and patients. Dr. Reed should be given information about the Board’s impaired-practitioner program or professional assistance and encouraged to self-report and seek evaluation. Whether Dr. Nguyen has a mandatory duty to report Dr. Reed to the Board depends on the specific Missouri reporting rule and the seriousness of the risk; if Dr. Reed is practicing while impaired and poses an imminent danger, Dr. Nguyen should report promptly. He should consult the Board’s rules or legal counsel if time permits. Retaliation is inappropriate, but allowing impaired practice is not an option.