The Four-Year Gap: Reinstatement, CE, and a Kansas License
Dr. Alan Ruiz was first licensed in Missouri in 2012. In 2019 he moved to Kansas, obtained an active Kansas license, and in 2021 stopped renewing his Missouri license; he did not request inactive status and completed no Missouri continuing education. He believed the Missouri license had simply "gone inactive." In 2025 a rural Missouri clinic offers him a position starting next week. He has practiced continuously in Kansas, has 40 hours of Kansas continuing education from the past two years, and has no disciplinary history. He asks whether he can begin seeing patients while his office manager "fixes the paperwork," whether his Kansas CE will satisfy Missouri, and whether he can supervise two unlicensed assistants at the new clinic. He also mentions that a colleague told him he could avoid the reinstatement process by applying for licensure by endorsement based on his Kansas license.
1. Can Dr. Ruiz see patients at the rural clinic before reinstatement? What is the difference between inactive and lapsed status?
Read the worked answer
He cannot see patients, supervise clinical staff, or hold himself out as a Missouri licensee until the board restores an active license. A lapsed license is not a license to practice; treating it as one is unlicensed practice and exposes both Dr. Ruiz and the clinic to board action. Inactive status, if available, is an affirmative status that must be requested and maintained under board rules, often with fees and limited or no practice rights. Dr. Ruiz did not request it and stopped renewing, so his Missouri license lapsed. The clinic should not schedule him for patient care until the board confirms reinstatement in writing. He may perform non-clinical administrative work that does not require a license, but he should not examine patients, prescribe, or supervise ancillary personnel in Missouri in the meantime.
2. Will his 40 hours of Kansas CE satisfy Missouri's reinstatement requirements, and what else may the board require?
Read the worked answer
He should not assume that. Continuing education must be acceptable to the Missouri board, fall within the relevant period, and include any specific subject areas the board requires, such as jurisprudence. Kansas hours may be credited if they are substantively equivalent and documented, but the board has discretion and may require additional Missouri-specific hours. Reinstatement typically requires an application, fee, disclosure of the lapse and any discipline, and proof of CE. Because the lapse is several years, the board may also require a jurisprudence examination, a refresher, or reexamination before restoring active status. Dr. Ruiz should ask the board in writing what it will require, preserve certificates and syllabi, and wait for written approval. His clean disciplinary history and continuous Kansas practice help, but they do not automatically cure the lapsed Missouri license.
3. Is the colleague correct that licensure by endorsement avoids reinstatement? Explain how the board would likely treat that advice.
Read the worked answer
That advice is risky and probably wrong. Endorsement is generally a pathway for an optometrist who has never held a Missouri license and who holds a qualifying license elsewhere. Dr. Ruiz already held a Missouri license and allowed it to lapse. The board is likely to treat him as a reinstatement applicant and to require him to disclose the prior Missouri license. Applying through endorsement while omitting the lapse could be treated as misrepresentation on a licensing application, which is itself a disciplinary ground. The better course is to file the correct reinstatement application, disclose the Kansas license and CE, and ask the board to consider his continuous practice. If the board permits an endorsement-style review, it will still require proof of qualifications and compliance with Missouri law.