Groupon, 'Pain-Free,' and a Management Fee
A new dentist opens a practice in Montana with a non-dentist investor who owns 49% of the LLC and receives 15% of gross collections as a 'management fee.' The practice advertises on a deal site: '$49 new-patient exam, X-rays, and cleaning' and 'pain-free dentistry guaranteed-top 1% dentist in Montana.' The fine print says the deal excludes periodontal treatment and must be used within 30 days. The deal site keeps 50% of the coupon revenue. The investor also wants to pay the front desk a $25 bonus for each patient who accepts a crown. The dentist has not yet signed the final ad proof and asks whether the arrangement and ads are lawful.
1. Analyze the 49% non-dentist ownership and 15% gross-collections management fee under Montana law.
Read the worked answer
Two problems arise. First, a non-dentist owning 49% of a dental practice LLC raises the corporate practice of dentistry and illegal ownership issue; Montana limits ownership and control of dental practices to licensed dentists through professional entities. Second, a 15% fee on gross collections is a percentage of professional revenue paid to a non-dentist, which is fee splitting. A management fee must be fair market value for actual administrative services, not a share of dental fees. The practice should be restructured so the dentist owns and controls the professional entity, and the management fee should be a flat or hourly fair-market fee, not a percentage of collections. Legal review is needed before signing.
2. Evaluate the advertising claims and coupon terms.
Read the worked answer
Ads must be truthful and not misleading. 'Pain-free guaranteed' is an unsubstantiated guarantee; 'top 1% dentist in Montana' needs objective substantiation. The $49 offer must disclose material limits clearly; if it excludes periodontal treatment and expires in 30 days, that must be conspicuous, not buried. The deal site's 50% share and the practice's 15% management fee may make the advertised economics misleading. A low-price exam that predictably leads to excluded treatment can be bait-and-switch pricing. The dentist should revise the ad to remove guarantees and unsubstantiated rankings and to state the full terms.
3. Is the $25 bonus for each crown acceptance permissible?
Read the worked answer
No. A $25 bonus to the front desk for each crown is compensation tied to a specific professional procedure paid to a non-dentist, which is fee splitting and referral compensation. It also creates an overtreatment incentive and can violate unprofessional-conduct rules. Staff compensation should be based on legitimate administrative duties, not on which procedures patients accept. The dentist should eliminate the bonus and document any productivity plan through a compliant, fair-market structure that does not reward procedure volume.