The Capital Payment That Should Not Have Been Made
Wren Will Trust was created on Robert's death in 2019 with €2.4m. His second wife, Anna, receives income for life; on her death, capital passes to Robert's two children from his first marriage. The trustee is a sole corporate trustee. In 2021 the trustee paid Anna €90,000 from capital, relying on a clause it read as permitting capital advances to the income beneficiary. Anna spent the money renovating her home. In 2024 new counsel advises that the clause only allowed capital to be advanced for Anna's maintenance, education, or benefit, and only with the consent of the protectors, which was never obtained. Anna is now 78 and has limited assets. The children have demanded that the trustee restore €90,000 plus lost growth, now estimated at €25,000. The trustee holds professional indemnity cover and has €140,000 cash in the trust.
1. Is the trustee liable for the €90,000 and the lost growth? What defences are available?
Read the worked answer
The starting point is that the payment was made outside the power. A trustee who distributes trust capital without authority commits a breach of trust and is personally liable to restore the fund. The liability normally includes the amount paid and the loss of growth that the fund would have earned, so the €25,000 claim is conceptually sound. The fact that Anna spent the money does not by itself excuse the trustee.
Defences and mitigating factors need careful assessment. The trustee may seek relief under the statutory jurisdiction that allows a court to excuse a trustee who acted honestly and reasonably and ought fairly to be excused. Reliance on legal advice is relevant but not a complete defence if the advice was not obtained, was plainly wrong, or was not followed. The trustee should check whether the protectors' consent was a condition of the power and whether any protector consented orally or in writing. It should also check limitation periods and whether the children consented or acquiesced; on these facts they did not. The ambiguity of the clause may support an honest-belief argument, but ambiguity does not enlarge the power. The trustee should notify its insurer and preserve all advice and correspondence.
2. What can the trustee recover from Anna or others, and what practical steps should it take?
Read the worked answer
The trustee can seek restitution or compensation from Anna as the recipient of trust property, but her position is not straightforward. She received the money in good faith and spent it on her home. A change-of-position defence may reduce or defeat recovery, although the trustee may argue that the renovation increased the value of her property and that the trust should be subrogated to that value. The trustee could also consider a charge or other security over Anna's home, but that would be an aggressive step against a life beneficiary and may not be in the interests of the trust as a whole.
Practical steps should be proportionate. The trustee should write to Anna, explain the issue, and invite proposals. Mediation may produce a settlement, such as a reduction in future income payments or a voluntary charge. The trustee should review whether any adviser or former trustee should contribute. It should also consider whether the children would prefer a negotiated outcome to litigation, given costs and Anna's age. Any settlement should be documented and, where appropriate, approved by the court or by all affected beneficiaries.
3. Can the trustee use the €140,000 trust cash to pay legal costs and rely on indemnity or insurance?
Read the worked answer
A trustee has a right to indemnity from the trust estate for expenses properly incurred in administering the trust. That right does not automatically cover the cost of defending allegations of breach of trust. If the trustee is ultimately found liable, it cannot normally use trust funds to meet its personal liability. If it succeeds, it may recover costs, but the timing and cash-flow risk remain.
The trustee should notify its professional indemnity insurer immediately and check whether the policy covers defence costs, regulatory enquiries, and the claim. The insurer may appoint lawyers, and the trustee should consider whether it needs separate representation because of a conflict. Trust cash should be used cautiously: €140,000 may be needed for Anna's income and administration, and spending it on litigation could prejudice the beneficiaries. The trustee could seek the court's directions on whether to defend or settle, and on the use of trust funds for costs. This is often the safest route where the trustee is exposed personally and the beneficiaries are divided.